📋
Extraído del Informe Consolidado
Esta investigación fue publicada originalmente como parte de un informe consolidado más amplio que contiene múltiples investigaciones. Consulte el PDF consolidado para ver el documento completo.
⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 16 findings
F1
Page 34
The 24-hour Crisis Intervention Training course has given law enforcement responders additional tools for dealing with people in crisis, resulting in less use of force.
Related Recommendations (1)
R8
Page 52
The District should provide formal training to all Board and committee members and senior staff on how to communicate with the public on contentious issues. (F1, F3) Published May 31, 2018 2 017-2018 Consolidated Final Report 49 Required Response Respond Within/ Respondent Findings Recommendations Respond By San Lorenzo Valley 90 Days Water District Board F1 – F3 R1 – R8 August 29, 2018 of Directors Abbreviations and Definitions ● CIP: Capital Improvement Program (also called Capital Improvement Plan) ● CTV: Community Television of Santa Cruz County ● Gantt Chart: “A Gantt chart is a visual view of tasks scheduled over time.”[105] ● Glyphosate: “Glyphosate is an herbicide. It is applied to the leaves of plants to kill both broadleaf plants and grasses.”[106] ● LADOC: Lompico Assessment District Oversight Committee ● LAFCO: Local Agency Formation Commission for Santa Cruz County ● LCWD: Lompico County Water District ● Resolution 953-A: LAFCO resolution (also called the “merger agreement”) approving SLVWD’s annexation of LCWD (also called the “merger”) ● SCADA: Supervisory control and data acquisition system ● SLVWD: San Lorenzo Valley Water District, also referred to in this report as “the District”
F2
Page 34
Adding more mental health liaisons and increasing their hours of availability would increase the benefit of this program to law enforcement and people in crisis.
Related Recommendations (2)
R1
Page 35
The County Health Services Agency and the County’s five law enforcement agencies should create a plan to make mental health liaisons available to respond to 9-1-1 EDP calls at all hours in all jurisdictions. (F2)
R6
Page 52
The District should provide formal training about assessment districts to LADOC members and all others involved in the administration of the Assessment District. (F2)
F3
Page 34
Having law enforcement be the primary responder to non-threatening 9-1-1 EDP calls reduces the overall availability of law enforcement to the community.
Related Recommendations (3)
R2
Page 35
The County Health Services Agency and the County’s five law enforcement agencies should create a plan to make MERT available to respond to 9-1-1 EDP calls at all hours in all jurisdictions. (F3-F5)
R7
Page 52
The District should record all Board and committee meetings, and post the recordings online for public access. (F3)
R8
Page 52
The District should provide formal training to all Board and committee members and senior staff on how to communicate with the public on contentious issues. (F1, F3) Published May 31, 2018 2 017-2018 Consolidated Final Report 49 Required Response Respond Within/ Respondent Findings Recommendations Respond By San Lorenzo Valley 90 Days Water District Board F1 – F3 R1 – R8 August 29, 2018 of Directors Abbreviations and Definitions ● CIP: Capital Improvement Program (also called Capital Improvement Plan) ● CTV: Community Television of Santa Cruz County ● Gantt Chart: “A Gantt chart is a visual view of tasks scheduled over time.”[105] ● Glyphosate: “Glyphosate is an herbicide. It is applied to the leaves of plants to kill both broadleaf plants and grasses.”[106] ● LADOC: Lompico Assessment District Oversight Committee ● LAFCO: Local Agency Formation Commission for Santa Cruz County ● LCWD: Lompico County Water District ● Resolution 953-A: LAFCO resolution (also called the “merger agreement”) approving SLVWD’s annexation of LCWD (also called the “merger”) ● SCADA: Supervisory control and data acquisition system ● SLVWD: San Lorenzo Valley Water District, also referred to in this report as “the District”
F4
Page 34
The Mobile Emergency Response Team (MERT) is not accessible through 9-1-1, resulting in overuse of law enforcement.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Page 35
The County Health Services Agency and the County’s five law enforcement agencies should create a plan to make MERT available to respond to 9-1-1 EDP calls at all hours in all jurisdictions. (F3-F5)
F5
Page 34
Current dispatch procedures do not distinguish between threatening and non-threatening EDP calls. Making this distinction would create an opportunity for MERT to respond to the 70 percent of 9-1-1 EDP calls that do not involve a threat.
Related Recommendations (3)
R2
Page 35
The County Health Services Agency and the County’s five law enforcement agencies should create a plan to make MERT available to respond to 9-1-1 EDP calls at all hours in all jurisdictions. (F3-F5)
R3
Page 35
The County Health Services Agency, the County’s five law enforcement agencies, and Santa Cruz Regional 9-1-1 should develop a dispatch plan that classifies 9-1-1 EDP calls as threatening (the subject presents a danger to others) or nonthreatening (the subject does not present a danger to others). (F5)
R4
Page 35
Santa Cruz Regional 9-1-1 should dispatch MERT with a law enforcement liaison in response to non-threatening 9-1-1 EDP calls. (F5)
F6
Page 34
Having a private, for-profit contractor operate the County BHU reduces transparency between the Behavioral Health Department and the people they serve. Published May 17, 2018 2017-2018 Consolidated Final Report 31
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
Page 35
The County should conduct a compliance audit of the Telecare facility to investigate the allegations in the NAMI Santa Cruz task force report, post the results of the investigation on the Health Services Agency website, and recommend appropriate changes to performance specifications in any future contract. (F6) Commendation C1. The Grand Jury commends our County’s law enforcement agencies for incorporating the new methodologies set forth in the CIT course and adapting their procedures to those methodologies.
F7
Page 125
The Soquel Union Elementary School District did not provide documentation confirming that it had analyzed the Grand Jury’s recommendation within six months; however, in 2018 it took steps to address the complaint form issue identified in the recommendation.
No recommendations for this finding
F8
Page 125
The Board of Supervisors followed through on its commitments to analyze Grand Jury recommendations related to Domestic Violence Commission meeting times and reporting practices.
No recommendations for this finding
F9
Page 125
A District Attorney designee met with the presiding judge of the Superior Court to explore the re-establishment of a Domestic Violence Court, thus fulfilling the Board of Supervisors’ commitment to do so.
No recommendations for this finding
F10
Page 125
The Sheriff-Coroner’s Office analyzed the Grand Jury’s Facility Risk Report
No recommendations for this finding
F11
Page 125
The Sheriff-Coroner‘s Office fulfilled its commitment to build a fence to enclose the entire Main Jail.
No recommendations for this finding
F12
Page 125
The Board of Supervisors and the Sheriff-Coroner’s Office honored their commitments to make changes to the September 2016 provider contract for medical services for County detention facilities.
No recommendations for this finding
F13
Page 125
The Board of Supervisors and the Sheriff-Coroner’s Office fulfilled their commitment to do a Title 15 inspection of the Main Jail in 2016. Published June 27, 2018 1 22 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury
No recommendations for this finding
F14
Page 126
The Board of Supervisors and the Sheriff-Coroner’s Office confirmed that the Main Jail was in compliance with Title 15 Detoxification Treatment requirements in 2016.
No recommendations for this finding
F15
Page 126
The Felton Fire Protection District’s submission to the current Grand Jury of written policy and procedures regarding the acquisition and sale of real property contradicts the facts established in the 2016 Grand Jury report that the District lacked such documents, and is inconsistent with the District’s 2016 commitment to the public to adopt such policies and procedures in the future.
No recommendations for this finding
F16
Page 126
The Felton Fire Protection District has not yet fulfilled its commitment to post policies and procedures on its website.
No recommendations for this finding
Additional Recommendations 65
These recommendations are not explicitly linked to specific findings.
-
R36Page 33Grand Jury interviews.
-
R37Page 33Grand Jury interviews. Published May 31, 2018 2 017-2018 Consolidated Final Report 53
-
R38Page 33SLVWD. October 20, 2016. Board of Directors Meeting Minutes, pp 10-11. http://www.slvwd.com/agendas/minutes/2016/Minutes%20BoD.10.20.16- approved.pdf#page=10
-
R39Page 33SLVWD. 2016. “San Lorenzo Valley Water District: SLVWD Meeting: 10-20-16.” Community TV of Santa Cruz County (CTV) video, 105:45 (min:sec). http://vp.telvue.com/preview?id=T02695&video=293570
-
R40Page 33Grand Jury interviews.
-
R41Page 33SLVWD. Nov. 9, 2017. Board of Directors Meeting, audio recording. (See 14.)
-
R42Page 33SLVWD. Nov. 9, 2017. Board of Directors Meeting, audio recording. (See 14.)
-
R43Page 33SLVWD. Nov. 9, 2017. Board of Directors Meeting, audio recording. (See 14.)
-
R44Page 33Grand Jury interviews.
-
R45Page 33SLVWD. Nov. 9, 2017. Board of Directors Meeting, audio recording. (See 14.)
-
R46Page 33Grand Jury interviews.
-
R47Page 33SLVWD. Nov. 9, 2017. Board of Directors Meeting, audio recording. (See 14.)
-
R48Page 33Michael J. Freitas. March 22, 2016. “Assessment District No. 2016-01, Lompico County Water District, Santa Cruz, State of California, Engineering Report for Assessment District No. 2016-01, Merger with San Lorenzo Valley Water District, Lompico County Water District, County of Santa Cruz,” p 9. http://slvwd.com/lompico/EngineersReport3-22-16.pdf#page=11
-
R49Page 33SLVWD. March 9, 2017. “Assessment District No. 2016-1: Gantt Chart.”Notice of Lompico Assessment District Oversight Committee Meeting, p 4. http://slvwd.com/lompico/3.9.17%20LADOC%20with%20backup.pdf#page=4
-
R50Page 33District Manager. Nov 16, 2017. “SLVWD CIP Draft.” SLVWD Revised Board of Directors Meeting Agenda, item 10b, p 57. http://www.slvwd.com/agendas/Full/2017/11-16- 2017/BoD%20MEETING%2011.16.17with%20backup.pdf#page=158
-
R51Page 33District Manager. November 16, 2017. “Estimate of Cash Flow for AD16-1, Lompico Assessment District November 2017.” SLVWD Board of Directors Meeting Agenda, item 10b, p 55. http://www.slvwd.com/agendas/Full/2017/11-16- 2017/BoD%20MEETING%2011.16.17with%20backup.pdf#page=156
-
R52Page 33SLVWD. October 20, 2016. Board of Directors Meeting Minutes, p 4. http://www.slvwd.com/agendas/minutes/2016/Minutes%20BoD.10.20.16- approved.pdf#page=4
-
R53Page 33Grand Jury interviews.
-
R54Page 33SLVWD. October 20, 2016. “Resolution 8: Support of Merger Between San Lorenzo Valley Water District and Lompico County Water District.” Board of Directors Meeting Agenda, p 151. http://www.slvwd.com/agendas/Full/2016/10-20- 2016/2016.10.20.BoDAgenda%20with%20backup.pdf#page=151 Published May 31, 2018 5 4 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury
-
R55Page 34Grand Jury interviews.
-
R56Page 34Local Agency Formation Commission. August 6, 2014. “Making Determinations and Ordering Protest Proceedings of Territory Designated as the Lompico Reorganization LAFCO Resolution No. 953-A,” section 7(B), p 2. http://santacruzlafco.org/Library/Res%20953- A%20Final%20for%20web.pdf#page=2
-
R57Page 34Task Force on Bond Accountability. 2015. “Task Force Final Report,” p 13. California Office of the State Treasurer. http://www.treasurer.ca.gov/tfba/final_report.pdf#page=13
-
R58Page 34Mark Campbell. August 3, 2017. “Bond Accountability: How to Make it an Everyday Thing.” California State Association of Counties. http://www.counties.org/csac-bulletin-article/bond-accountability-how-make-it- everyday-thing
-
R59Page 34Task Force on Bond Accountability (TFBA). December 14, 2015. “Task Force Final Report.” California Office of the State Treasurer. http://www.treasurer.ca.gov/tfba/final_report.pdf
-
R60Page 34San Diego County Taxpayers Association (SDCTA). October 21, 2011. “Oversight Committee Best Practices.” SDCTA. http://www.sdcta.org/assets/files/Board%20Approved%202011%20Oversight%2 0Committee%20Best%20Practices%20w.out%20Appendices.pdf
-
R61Page 34California League of Bond Oversight Committees (CaLBOC). 2009. “Best Practices, Citizens’ Bond Oversight Committee Operation Standards.” San Mateo County Office of Education. http://www.smcoe.org/assets/files/about-smcoe/superintendents-office/citizens- bond-oversight/BestPractices_5.09.pdf
-
R62Page 34City of San Diego. 2008. “North Park Maintenance Assessment District (NPMAD) Advisory Committee Bylaws.” NPMAD, as amended March 10, 2008. https://npmaddotorg.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/mad-bylaws-amended-03-10- 08.pdf
-
R63Page 34Transportation Authority of Marin (TAM). 2011. “Citizen Oversight Committee Bylaws.” TAM, as amended October 27, 2011. http://2b0kd44aw6tb3js4ja3jprp6-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp- content/uploads/doc-reports/citizenss-oversight-committee/4444.pdf
-
R64Page 34Campbell. 2017. “Bond Accountability...” (See 58.)
-
R65Page 34Campbell. 2017. “Bond Accountability...” (See 58.)
-
R66Page 34Little Hoover Commission. 2009. “Bond Spending: Expanding and Enhancing Oversight,” pp xiii-xiv. http://www.lhc.ca.gov/sites/lhc.ca.gov/files/Reports/197/Report197.pdf#page=18
-
R67Page 34Grand Jury interviews.
-
R68Page 34Grand Jury interviews. Published May 31, 2018 2 017-2018 Consolidated Final Report 55
-
R69Page 34CaLBOC. 2009. “Best Practices…” (See 61.)
-
R70Page 34TFBA. 2015. “Task Force Final Report.” (See 59.)
-
R71Page 34SDCTA. 2011. “Oversight Committee Best Practices.” (See 60.)
-
R72Page 34CaLBOC. 2009. “Best Practices…” (See 61.)
-
R73Page 34City of San Diego. 2008. “...Advisory Committee Bylaws.” (See 62.)
-
R74Page 35TAM. 2011. “Citizen Oversight Committee Bylaws.” (See 63.)
-
R75Page 35LAFCO. 2014. “...Resolution No. 953-A.” (See 56.)
-
R76Page 35SLVWD. 2016. “Resolution No. 39...” (See 3.)
-
R77Page 35Lompico County Water District. December 9, 2015. “Resolution No. 2015-1: A Resolution Requesting Approval by the County of Santa Cruz of Proposed Resolution of Intention and Boundary map Under Section 10104 of the Streets and Highways Code of California.” Resolution 300-2015, pp 13-14. Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors. http://sccounty01.co.santa- cruz.ca.us/BDS/Govstream2/Bdsvdata/non_legacy_2.0/Minutes/2015/20151215- 676/PDF/035.pdf#page=13
-
R78Page 35Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors. December 15, 2015. “Resolution No. 300-2015: Resolution Approving the Proposed Resolution of Intention and Boundary Map under Section 10104 of the Streets and Highways Code of California in and for the Lompico County Water District’s Proposed Assessment District No. 2016-1.” Resolution 300-2015, pp 4-5. Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors. http://sccounty01.co.santa- cruz.ca.us/BDS/Govstream2/Bdsvdata/non_legacy_2.0/Minutes/2015/20151215- 676/PDF/035.pdf#page=4
-
R79Page 35District Manager. April 20, 2017. “Lompico Assessment District Oversight Committee.” SLVWD Special Board of Directors Meeting Agenda, item 14e, p 1. http://www.slvwd.com/agendas/Full/2017/4-20- 2017/2017.4.20.BoDAgenda.pdf#page=354
-
R80Page 35District Manager. May 11, 2017. “Re: May 11th Meeting Agenda,” Email. Notice of Lompico Assessment District Oversight Committee Meeting, p 126. http://www.slvwd.com/lompico/LADOC%20Agenda%2005_11_2017.pdf#page=1 26
-
R81Page 35Grand Jury interviews.
-
R82Page 35District Manager. 2017. “Re: May 11th Meeting Agenda.” (See 80.)
-
R83Page 36SLVWD. June 13, 2017. Notice of Lompico Assessment District Oversight Committee Meeting, pp 1-17. http://slvwd.com/lompico/6.13.17%20LADOC%20with%20backup.pdf
-
R84Page 36Grand Jury interviews.
-
R85Page 36District Manager. 2017. “Discussion and Possible Action…” (See 31.) Published May 31, 2018 5 6 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury
-
R86Page 36SLVWD. October 19, 2017. “Post Assessment of the Merger with Lompico Water District and Conditions of Lafco Agreement.” Board of Directors Meeting. CTV video discussion of Item 10a starts at 53:25 (min:sec). http://vp.telvue.com/preview?id=T02695&video=323585
-
R87Page 36Cal Gov Code, Title 5, Div. 2, Part 1, Chap. 9. “Meetings.” §54953.5(b). 2010. Accessed February 16, 2018. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum= 54953.5.&lawCode=GOV
-
R88Page 36SLVWD. Nov. 9, 2017. Board of Directors Meeting, audio recording. (See 14.)
-
R89Page 36SLVWD. Nov. 9, 2017. Board of Directors Meeting, audio recording. (See 14.)
-
R90Page 36SLVWD. January 18, 2018. Board of Directors Meeting. CTV video recording, at approx. 218:44 (min:sec). http://vp.telvue.com/preview?id=T02695&video=329241
-
R91Page 36SLVWD. December 15, 2016. “Objective II; Communications.” Board Policy Manual 2017, p 1. http://www.slvwd.com/BOD_Manual/2017%20Board%20Policy%20Manual.pdf#p age=5
-
R92Page 36SLVWD. 2017. Draft Board Policy Manual, p 3 of the November 6, 2017, tracked- changes version. http://www.slvwd.com/agendas/OTHER/2017/11-8- 2017%20Admin%20Mtg/2017%20Board%20Policy%20Manual.%20Revised.110 617.docx
-
R93Page 36Barry Holtzclaw. 2017. “Water district directors take gloves off.” Press Banner, April 27, 2017. http://www.goldenstatenewspapers.com/press_banner/water-district-directors- take-gloves-off/article_c99150e2-2bd0-11e7-8b14-e7638b4073c7.html
-
R94Page 37Barry Holtzclaw. 2017. “Shouting, kicking interrupt water hearing.” Press Banner, September 29, 2017. http://m.goldenstatenewspapers.com/press_banner/eedition/page-pb- cover/page_85ae7959-d335-5d41-a11f-fc7fd9c6de75.html
-
R95Page 37Direct observation by Grand Jury members attending the SLVWD Board of Directors Meeting on September 21, 2017.
-
R96Page 37Barry Holtzclaw. 2017. “Sheriff called to SLVWD meeting.” Press Banner, June 22, 2017. http://www.goldenstatenewspapers.com/press_banner/sheriff-called-to-slvwd- meeting/article_bf89d49a-578e-11e7-9273-4b702fc15453.html
-
R97Page 37District Manager. November 16, 2017. “FY1718 Budget Revision Request.” SLVWD Board of Directors Revised Agenda, item 9a, pp 1-4. http://www.slvwd.com/agendas/Full/2017/11-16- 2017/BoD%20MEETING%2011.16.17with%20backup.pdf#page=5 Published May 31, 2018 2 017-2018 Consolidated Final Report 57
-
R98Page 37SLVWD. November 16, 2017. Board of Directors Meeting Minutes, p 1. http://slvwd.com/agendas/minutes/2017/Minutes%20BoD.11.16.17%20- %20approved.pdf
-
R99Page 37Barry Holtzclaw. 2017. “SLVWD won't release letter from Vierra.” Press Banner, April 6, 2017. http://www.goldenstatenewspapers.com/press_banner/slvwd-won-t-release- letter-from-vierra/article_ed0ee7aa-1af5-11e7-8ce0-5fbc1097aad2.html
-
R100Page 37Libby Leyden. 2018. “San Lorenzo Valley Water District considers lawsuit against director.” Press Banner, January 31, 2018. http://www.goldenstatenewspapers.com/press_banner/san-lorenzo-valley-water- district-considers-lawsuit-against-director/article_12879000-06fe-11e8-a68f- 17d3356ceb0a.html
Conclusions 6
-
CL1Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors (10 recommendations)
-
CL2Mental Health Advisory Board (3 recommendations)
-
CL3Soquel Union Elementary School District (1 recommendation)
-
CL4Sheriff-Coroner (5 recommendations)
-
CL5Felton Fire Protection District Board of Directors (1 recommendation) Published June 27, 2018 Page 10 of 19 2 017-2018 Consolidated Final Report 119 As previously discussed, respondents to Grand Jury investigative reports do not have a statutory duty to provide verification that analyses or changes have been completed; therefore, the current Grand jury opened a new investigation to determine how government officials followed through on their 2016 commitments. We summarize graphically our findings in Figures 1 and 2. Figure 1 shows the number of recommendations that each government entity committed to consider within 6 months and whether it followed through on those stated commitments. Figure 2 shows the number of recommendations that each government entity committed to implement at a specified time in the future and whether it it followed through on those stated commitments. Figure 1 shows that four of the five submissions provided the current Grand Jury with documentation describing the actions taken to analyze a recommendation; the fifth submission showed that the organization addressed the issues identified in the 2015-16 Grand Jury’s recommendations at some point in time. Figure 1: Actions Taken to Analyze Recommendations Within 6 Months Published June 27, 2018 Page 11 of 19 1 20 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Figure 2 shows that 12 of 15 submissions confirmed to the current Grand Jury that a
-
CL6In September 2017 an article in the Santa Cruz Sentinel quoted a staff member in the County’s Human Services Department: We should be housing every youth we see. We should not be walking and stepping over the youth that are lying down or standing around who are homeless. We should be interacting with them, we should be engaging them and thinking about, ‘How can I personally, in Santa Cruz County, contribute to this cause?’ ‘How can I end youth homelessness on an individual basis?’[40] More than one in four of Santa Cruz County’s homeless is a young adult or an unaccompanied minor child. They are, for the most part, invisible members of our community. Recognizing the urgency to solve youth homelessness, there have been many well-intentioned efforts at the local, State and federal levels, some of which have been very effective but limited in their scope. Implementation of the HUD Continuum of Care model is a significant step toward resolving the problems identified in this investigation, as well as the other difficulties facing the children and young adults who are homeless in Santa Cruz County; however, while the grants and other funding have addressed some systemic deficiencies, additional resources will be required to achieve the County’s goal of ending youth homelessness by 2020. Published June 19, 2018 Page 12 of 18 2 017-2018 Consolidated Final Report 85
Commendations 3
-
CM1C1. The COE and CSO responded quickly and comprehensively to the recommendations of the 2016-17 Grand Jury report and drafted a plan that creates a firm foundation to address the safety of our students in the context of targeted school violence. C2. The COE and CSO have demonstrated clear commitment to providing ongoing training so that school staff and law enforcement can function collaboratively and respond effectively to threats of violence in our schools. Published April 12, 2018 Page 4 of 9 2017-2018 Consolidated Final Report 9
-
CM2C1. The Grand Jury commends our County’s law enforcement agencies for incorporating the new methodologies set forth in the CIT course and adapting their procedures to those methodologies.
-
CM3C1. The Board of Supervisors and the County Administrative Officer initiated, for the first time in Santa Cruz County history, a strategic planning process and performance improvement effort. Published June 7, 2018 Page 8 of 14 2017-2018 Consolidated Final Report 67