📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Score: 0 (0/3/0)
El Dorado County Grand Jury • 2002-2003

Purchase of a Doctor's Services for a "Fitness for Duty" Evaluation

4 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 5 findings

F1 Page 88
Of the nine County employees tested during 2000/01 and 2001/02, five were found unfit for duty.
F2 Page 88
Employees must travel to the doctor’s office in Sacramento, including employees who reside and work in South Lake Tahoe.
F3 Page 88
Some departments do not consistently follow purchase order and contract procedures and policies set forth by the Board of Supervisors.
F4 Page 88
Department Directors are not held accountable for following policies and procedures related to purchase orders and contracts by the CAO and the Board of Supervisors.
F5 Page 88
The County did not appropriately contract for the doctor’s services directly and therefore the County was probably not protected from liability and potential litigation.

Recommendations 5

Agency Responses 1

Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.