📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
Glenn County Grand Jury
• 2011-2012
Glenn County Office of Education I. Purpose To answer questions raised regarding policies associated with the Glenn
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 5 findings
F1
GSRM does not require harassment training; it only provides it as a service to educate their members.
F2
It is up to the department to follow the law for supervisor harassment training.
F3
GSRM has no authority over any county office and cannot demand employees are trained.
F4
In the event there is a harassment suit filed, any and all county employees trained or not, will not be denied coverage.
F5
Other than people in supervisory positions, other staff may receive peer training, but it is not a requirement of GSRM. A request of GCOE to provide the status of harassment training to all current supervisory per- sonnel revealed that of the 49 eligible management position (as of 3/1/2012), 8 have been com- pleted, with the remainder to be completed by June 30, 2012. GCOE does not offer peer-to-peer harassment training to subordinates. IV. CONCLUSIONS Checks and balances between the Glenn County Office of Education and the Glenn County Board of Education have improved over the past few years, with ongoing development of poli- cies that dictate their interactions.
Recommendations 2
-
R1Page 34Continue to research/pursue grants and additional funding.
-
R2Page 34During public outreach, make known the importance of book donations and how they benefit the Friends of the Library, which in turn supports the libraries. VI. RESPONSES REQUIRED None 32