📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Santa Clara County Grand Jury • 2010-2011

Cc#fmc Santa Clara County Fairgrounds Management Corp. The Fair • Community Events • San Jose Fair Downs Satellite*

Published: June 22, 2011 27 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 8 findings

F1 Page 1
The County established FMC as a nonprofit to operate the Fairgrounds; however, FMC has not been successful. FMC has operated at a loss and has required County bailout in all but one of the past sixteen years. 5. FMC Response to GJ
F2 Page 1
In the last sixteen years, the FMC Board has not commissioned – nor has the County requested the Board to commission – an independent performance audit of FMC, even though FMC's poor performance warrants this type of audit. 9. FMC Response to GJ
F3 Page 1
The County does not hold the FMC Board accountable for its lack of oversight in ensuring FMC meets its contractual obligations, and the FMC Board does not demonstrate the business acumen necessary to effectively oversee the FMC. There is a seat vacant (to be filled by the District 4 Supervisor) on the FMC Board. ì 15. FMC Response to
F4 Page 1
The County, supported by the Office of the County Executive, appears to have only a "land management" concern when FMC is required by contract to pay all expenses of the fair. 21. FMC Response to
F5 Page 1
FMC has not optimized its supplier contracts and has demonstrated inability to fully perform its own contract to effectively manage the Fairgrounds, costing the taxpayers in the form of County bailouts. 25. FMC Response to
F6 Page 1
FMC paid bonuses to employees in 2010. The reason for these bonuses has no apparent connection to any operational decisions that would ensure continued profitability. Rather, the bonuses looked like a distribution of an unexplained windfall. 35. FMC Response to
F7 Page 1
The FMC Board does not adequately perform its oversight function of FMC. 39. FMC Response to
F8 Page 1
The County is undercharging communications tower renters, effectively diluting potential revenue to FMC. 45. FMC Response to

Recommendations 14

* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.