📋
Extraído del Informe Consolidado

Esta investigación fue publicada originalmente como parte de un informe consolidado más amplio que contiene múltiples investigaciones. Consulte el PDF consolidado para ver el documento completo.

Placer County Grand Jury • 2003-2004

City of Lincoln Purchasing Practices

14 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 2 findings

F1
The City has not implemented Chapter 3.24. Instead, it has appointed a clerk to also function as a Purchasing Clerk with limited duties and responsibilities limited primarily to the Department of Finance with other departments functioning independently. This is far less than what is contained in Chapter 3.24. The City agrees with Finding #1. 9
F2
The City has not negotiated volume discounts even though records reviewed by the Grand Jury indicate hundreds of purchases a year are made from the same vendors, which should entitle the City to such discounts. The City agrees with Finding #2. The City does purchase many items through State contracts that do take advance of high volume State purchases. FINDINGS #3: An interview with the Placer County Purchasing Director verified significant savings could be obtained by implementing an organized and coordinated purchasing process. In the case of Placer County, savings exceeded the operating costs of the department. The City agrees with Finding #3, however, it must be acknowledged that Placer County with an annual budget of ten times that of the City enjoys economies of scale far in excess of those available to the City.

Recommendations 1