📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Plumas County Grand Jury • 2004-2005

Plumas County

Published: June 15, 2005 9 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 8 findings

F1 Page 25
The recommendations of the 2002/2003 Grand Jury were, for the most part, ignored by the County. The following list contains the recommendations of that Grand Jury. For each finding or recommendation, the current status, as found by the current Grand Jury, is shown in bold print. 2002/2003 Grand Jury Findings:
F2 Page 25
The County Fire Warden position is part-time and exercises no direct control over the fire districts within Plumas County. The Fire Warden does respond when requested by the fire districts to provide technical assistance and training. Current Status: The Fire Warden has resigned.
F3 Page 25
With few exceptions, Plumas County fire districts have inadequate funding to carry out their mission. Most equipment is outdated and each of the districts relies on volunteers to staff their departments. Current Status: No change in this situation.
F4 Page 25
Approximately 20 percent of the privately held land in the County is not in a fire district. Current Status: Little change in this situation.
F5 Page 25
A majority of fire chiefs interviewed favored more coordination and assistance from the County Fire Warden on fire issues such as funding, standardizing grant writing, training, recruiting and acquiring equipment. Current Status: Since there is now no fire warden, this situation has worsened. 22
F6 Page 26
There is no proactive effort by the County to inform new residents what level of fire protection, if any, exists in their area. In fact, on more than one occasion, witnesses responded with a “let the buyer beware” reply on that issue. Current Status: No change in this situation.
F7 Page 26
Plumas County Resolution No. 01-6534 is a resolution adopting a policy for County property tax exchanges with special districts providing fire protection services. Current Status: This Grand Jury has seen no evidence that this resolution has been acted upon. 2002/2003 Grand Jury Recommendations:
F8 Page 27
Provision of fire protection is not an essential element in the planning process for new real estate developments.

Recommendations 11

Conclusions 1

Commendations 4