Sonoma County Grand Jury • 2003-2004

Permit and Resource Management Division Compliance Review July 1, 2004

Published: July 01, 2004 3 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 3 findings

F1
There is no procedure in place to verify the implementation of all agreed upon
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
The Board of Supervisors must initiate a review procedure to guarantee implementation of grand jury recommendations that have been agreed upon by county departments and agencies.
F2
Zucker Systems, a professional management consultant, was hired by the Board of Supervisors to conduct an in-depth operational review of PRMD. A final report was submitted to the Board of Supervisors in January 2001. The Zucker Report provided 271 detailed recommendations and identified 8 key priority areas.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
PRMD must complete implementation of the agreed upon recommendations in the 2000- 2001 Grand Jury Final Report.
F3
As of April 5, 2004, PRMD had not fully implemented agreed to recommendations made by the 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 grand jury. Some of the agreed to recommendations from the 2000-2001 report not fully implemented were: (cid:131) R3. PRMD must have a formal written policy for ongoing training and cross-training. (cid:131) R4. Each Unit within PRMD must develop formal written procedures to implement and monitor PRMD policy for both training and cross-training (cid:131) R9. The various parts of the permit process must be integrated. Steps must be taken to ensure that a citizen gets complete and accurate information as to all procedures and permits that will be required before starting a project. The agreed to recommendation from the 2001-2002 report not fully implemented was: (cid:131) R6. PRMD must continue to make progress in implementing the recommendations of the Zucker Report. The Board of Supervisors should closely monitor this progress to assure that future milestones are achieved. 2/3 July 1, 2004 Conclusion Past grand jury recommendations are not always acted upon in a timely manner causing issues to resurface that could have been put to rest if implemented as agreed.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
PRMD must continue to make progress in implementing the recommendations of the Zucker Report. The Board of Supervisors should closely monitor this progress to assure that future milestones are achieved.

Additional Recommendations 1

These recommendations are not explicitly linked to specific findings.

Conclusions 1

No Responses Found 1

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

Sonoma County Board of Supervisors Elected County Office