📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Nevada County Grand Jury • 2018-2019

Nevada County Request for Proposal and Procurement Practices

11 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 5 findings

F1
The County does not have approved policies or procedures for the efficient operation of the Purchasing Department.
F2
The County’s Purchasing Guide is a training manual, not formal policy or procedure. The Purchasing Guide contains discrepancies between its contents, the Admin Code, and California Government Code; is not consistent with generally recognized best procurement practices, is ambiguous as to RFP procedures, and is not always followed by County Offices and Departments.
F3
County employees receive training on the Purchasing Guide, but many who conduct purchasing operations and/or manage contracts are not fully trained on and do not always follow best procurement and contract management practices.
F4
RFP practices in the Purchasing Guide have a number of correctable issues that could be addressed with detailed procedures if properly followed by County Offices and Departments.
F5
The Office of the Auditor-Controller lacks sufficient staff to conduct contract reviews pursuant to BoS Resolution No. 98479, dated 27 October 1988, which requires internal contract audits be conducted every third year of the contract. No internal contract audits have been conducted since 2008 when the Auditor-Controller’s office staff was reduced by 25%.

Recommendations 9

No Responses Found 4

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

County of Nevada Agency
Nevada County County
Nevada County Auditor-Controller Elected County Office
Nevada County Board of Supervisors Elected County Office