📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
Nevada County Grand Jury
• 2018-2019
Nevada County Request for Proposal and Procurement Practices
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 5 findings
F1
The County does not have approved policies or procedures for the efficient operation of the Purchasing Department.
F2
The County’s Purchasing Guide is a training manual, not formal policy or procedure. The Purchasing Guide contains discrepancies between its contents, the Admin Code, and California Government Code; is not consistent with generally recognized best procurement practices, is ambiguous as to RFP procedures, and is not always followed by County Offices and Departments.
F3
County employees receive training on the Purchasing Guide, but many who conduct purchasing operations and/or manage contracts are not fully trained on and do not always follow best procurement and contract management practices.
F4
RFP practices in the Purchasing Guide have a number of correctable issues that could be addressed with detailed procedures if properly followed by County Offices and Departments.
F5
The Office of the Auditor-Controller lacks sufficient staff to conduct contract reviews pursuant to BoS Resolution No. 98479, dated 27 October 1988, which requires internal contract audits be conducted every third year of the contract. No internal contract audits have been conducted since 2008 when the Auditor-Controller’s office staff was reduced by 25%.
Recommendations 9
-
R1The CEO, in cooperation with the County’s Purchasing Agent, should continue researching procurement best practices and establish appropriate written procurement policies, practices, and procedures that would be followed in executing County procurement processes.
-
R2The County’s Human Resources department and Purchasing Agent should conduct an assessment of the training needs of current procurement staff and implement a plan for the training of new procurement employees on generally recognized best procurement practices.
-
R3The Purchasing Agent should submit a report to the BoS on completed revisions to the Purchasing Guide, as well as policies and procedures.
-
R4The Purchasing Agent should, of establishing formal written policies, practices, and procedures, and completing revisions to the Purchasing Guide, lead each County agency through training on the County’s new policies, practices, and procedures. Policies, procedures.
-
R5The Purchasing Guide should be reviewed and updated annually.
-
R6The Purchasing Guide should be updated to include the following: a. required BoS approvals prior to issuance of an RFP; b. establishment and handling of protest periods; c. evaluation panel reviewer selection and recusals; d. procedure in the event of evaluation panel reviewer statistical anomalies; e. bidder qualification reviews where contract administrators have escalated concerns regarding a vendor’s past contract performance; f. maintenance of documented administrative files during a blackout period of County employee contacts involved with the RFP process and RFP respondents other than the County person named in the RFP document; and g. maintenance of complete administrative files documenting and justifying final decisions when that decision goes against the evaluation panel’s recommendation.
-
R7The CEO’s office should complete a review of the Office of the Auditor-Controller and the staffing needs required to comply with BoS Resolution No. 98479 as soon as possible.
-
R8The CEO’s office should work with the Office of the Auditor-Controller to develop a checklist for contract administrators to document at least annually vendor performance and compliance with liability insurance requirements.
-
R9All County contract administrators should, using the checklist referred to in R8, conduct performance evaluations and document them in an administrative file. Problems or concerns with a vendor’s performance should be formally investigated and addressed.
No Responses Found 4
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.
County of Nevada
Agency
Nevada County
County
Nevada County Auditor-Controller
Elected County Office
Nevada County Board of Supervisors
Elected County Office