📋
Extraído del Informe Consolidado
Esta investigación fue publicada originalmente como parte de un informe consolidado más amplio que contiene múltiples investigaciones. Consulte el PDF consolidado para ver el documento completo.
⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 5 findings
F1
Page 8
The Abatement budget is insufficient to accomplish the goal of eliminating blight in Del
F2
Page 8
Processing of cases by Code Enforcement requires time & judicious discretion concerning
F3
Page 8
Education is lacking in proper means of trash disposal and creating a culture of community
F4
Page 8
There is no set dollar amount for Code Enforcement in the DNSWMA budget though it is
F5
Page 8
Code Enforcement investigates only complaints received from citizens of the county.
Recommendations 8
-
R1Page 8Increase the budget allocation for Code Enforcement abatement.
-
R2Page 8Continue judicious prioritizing & processing of Code Enforcement nuisance/blight
-
R3Page 8Increase community education about proper trash disposal through radio, newspaper, and
-
R4Page 8Continue seeking grants through Calrecycle.
-
R5Page 8Complete revision of County Nuisance Code with clear definitions, and a mission statement.
-
R6Page 8If additional funds are secured, create an account that could be used to fund abatements.
-
R7Page 8Establish an agreement between DNSWMA and Code Enforcement for a set amount of
-
R8Page 8There are many violations that are not reported by citizens that Code Enforcement could be