📋
Extraído del Informe Consolidado
Esta investigación fue publicada originalmente como parte de un informe consolidado más amplio que contiene múltiples investigaciones. Consulte el PDF consolidado para ver el documento completo.
⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 6 findings
F1
The 1998-99 Grand Jury report was given to each government entity that was required to respond to the report. It was also placed in local libraries, published in the local newspaper, and made available to a local radio station. The report and responses are on the internet at http"/www.co.nevada,ca.us/9899_Grand Jury Report/.
F2
The 1998-99 Grand Jury report contained a total of 162 findings covering 14 areas of government.
F3
The 1998-99 Grand Jury report contained 45 recommendations involving: Board of Supervisors (BOS) County Administrative Officer (CAO) Director of Human Services NID Board of Directors Sheriff Nevada County Board of Education Grass Valley City Council Nevada County Supt. Of Schools NJUHSD School Board NJUHSD Superintendent of Schools Chief Probation Officer Responses were required from all of the above.
F4
Incomplete responses were initially received from the NID Board of Directors, the Chief Probation Officer, and the NJUHSD Superintendent. These entities were contacted directly, and informed that they had not fulfilled the response requirements of California Penal Code Section 933 (b). A copy of these response requirements were given to each entity to aid in their compliance. All properly completed responses were received by November 17, 1999.
F5
The BOS agreed to implement or further study 7 of 17 recommendations in its response to the 1998-99 report. Ten recommendations are listed as already implemented. 35
F6
The BOS has overall responsibility for six of the reports included in the 1998-99 report. It shares responsibility in the remaining reports where the Sheriff, Planning Department, Human Services, and Community Development Agency are involved. CONCLUSIONS
Recommendations 6
-
R1The 1998-99 Grand Jury report was given to each government entity that was required to respond to the report. It was also placed in local libraries, published in the local newspaper, and made available to a local radio station. The report and responses are on the internet at http"/www.co.nevada,ca.us/9899_Grand Jury Report/.
-
R2The 1998-99 Grand Jury report contained a total of 162 findings covering 14 areas of government.
-
R3The 1998-99 Grand Jury report contained 45 recommendations involving: Board of Supervisors (BOS) County Administrative Officer (CAO) Director of Human Services NID Board of Directors Sheriff Nevada County Board of Education Grass Valley City Council Nevada County Supt. Of Schools NJUHSD School Board NJUHSD Superintendent of Schools Chief Probation Officer Responses were required from all of the above.
-
R4Incomplete responses were initially received from the NID Board of Directors, the Chief Probation Officer, and the NJUHSD Superintendent. These entities were contacted directly, and informed that they had not fulfilled the response requirements of California Penal Code Section 933 (b). A copy of these response requirements were given to each entity to aid in their compliance. All properly completed responses were received
-
R5The BOS agreed to implement or further study 7 of 17 recommendations in its response to the 1998-99 report. Ten recommendations are listed as already implemented. 35
-
R6The BOS has overall responsibility for six of the reports included in the 1998-99 report. It shares responsibility in the remaining reports where the Sheriff, Planning Department, Human Services, and Community Development Agency are involved. CONCLUSIONS