San Mateo County Grand Jury • 2007-2008

Issue | Background | Findings | Conclusions | Recommendations | Responses | Attachments San Mateo County Jails and

Published: June 23, 2008 14 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 9 findings

F1
There is a dedicated professional Sheriff’s staff that: • maintains the jails well • offers effective assistance programs, such as Choices, to the inmates in spite of the overcrowding in facilities too small to accommodate the population • motivates some inmates to re-enter society and avoid recidivism.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Explore with the Chief Probation Officer the creation and proper staffing of a program along the lines of the Bridges Program to provide rehabilitation of inmates not convicted and sentenced for crimes involving drugs or alcohol.
F2
The County currently plans to replace the Women’s Correctional Facility with a larger jail on the same site. Maguire Correctional Facility and the Women’s Correctional Center have been filled beyond capacity for 15 years, so it is important that a new jail be constructed jail without delay.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Avoid building a facility that is too small by constructing the largest facility that can be built on the selected site so that the building can properly house the current number of inmates and any projected increases in the jail population, and also provide space for both the rehabilitation and re-entry programs. San Mateo County Board of Supervisors and the San Mateo County Sheriff should:
F3
Continued over-crowding significantly increases the challenges in providing effective rehabilitation of inmates.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
Continued over-crowding significantly increases the challenges in providing effective rehabilitation of inmates. Response: The respondent agrees with the conclusion. Our Jail Planning Unit is working closely with the Board of Supervisors, County Manager’s Office and criminal justice stakeholders in planning for and securing a replacement jail facility both for males and females that will offer inmate programs and re-entry services offering a continuum of care and services from incarceration to release for our clients.
F4
The BOS has been made aware of the direct and indirect costs of overcrowding.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
The Board of Supervisors has been made aware of the direct and indirect costs of overcrowding. Response: The respondent agrees with the conclusion. Our Jail Planning Unit is working with the County Manager’s Office and County Real Property regarding site selection; a value matrix is being developed in order to assist in site selection for our replacement facility. This is an ongoing process to keep the Board of Supervisors aware of the direct and indirect costs of overcrowding. 2 of 6
F5
There are cost saving programs that are acceptable to prosecutors and courts that can be used as alternatives to incarceration, such as the Bridges Program.
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
There are cost saving programs that are acceptable to prosecutors and courts that can be used as alternatives to incarceration, such as the BRIDGES Program. Response: The respondent agrees with the conclusion. There are several post- incarceration programs, including BRIDGES that are helpful in providing re- entry programming to inmates upon release from custody.
F6
Overcrowding at the Maguire Correctional Facility will increase during construction if the current site of the Women’s Correctional Center is used as the site for the new jail. As such, acceptable alternatives will need to be identified and funded during construction. Palo Alto Daily News, 5/19/08 “Prisons may add to staff” 3
Related Recommendations (1)
R6
Overcrowding at the Maguire Correctional Facility will increase during construction if the current site of the Women’s Correctional Center is used as the site for the new jail. As such, acceptable alternatives will need to be identified and funded during construction. Response: The respondent agrees with the conclusion. The existing La Honda facilities will provide needed space for the temporary location of displaced inmates. We anticipate a detailed study to identify acceptable alternatives and funding obligations and opportunities.
F7
The principles of the Bridges Program may have a broader application in the Probation Department Program for the courts to consider as an alternative in all cases in which a referral to the Program may be appropriate.
Related Recommendations (1)
R7
The principles of the BRIDGES Program may have a broader application in the Probation Department for the Courts to consider as an alternative in all cases in which a referral to the Program may be appropriate. Response: The respondent agrees with the conclusion. Our Office is committed to working collaboratively with the Court, Probation and various service providers in the identification of a continuum of care, including rehabilitative and re-entry services spanning from incarceration to release, for detainees in our facilities.
F8
Electronic monitoring is being used in other jurisdictions in the State as a component in the sentencing of adults. It is also a frequent part of the sentencing for some of the juveniles in the county to be part of a program where each juvenile is assigned to a Probation Officer with a case load small enough for the Officer and the monitored juvenile to meet three times a week. Adding close supervision by Probation may make the use of electronic monitoring a viable option in the sentencing of some convicted adults in the county.
Related Recommendations (1)
R8
Electric monitoring is being used in other jurisdictions in the State as a component in the sentencing of adults. It is also a frequent part of sentencing for some of the juveniles in the county to be part of a program where each juvenile is assigned to a Probation Officer with a case load small enough for the Officer and the monitoring juvenile to meet three times a week. Adding close supervision by Probation may make the use of electronic monitoring a viable option in the sentencing of some convicted adults in the county. Response: The respondent agrees with the conclusion. Our Office is committed to working collaboratively with the Court and Probation to explore the use of electronic monitoring as a viable option in the sentencing of some convicted adults in our county. The Sheriff’s Office currently operates an Electronic Monitoring Program (EMP) for non-violent sentenced inmates in-lieu of jail when appropriate and when approved by the Court. It is anticipated that the Sheriff’s EMP participants will grow in conjunction with added programming which will be possible with a new replacement facility. 3 of 6
F9
San Mateo County owns the property upon which the new jail is proposed to be built. If the new facility is not large enough to accommodate the projected growth in the jail population, the need in the future to build an additional jail facility will be far more expensive because the county may need to purchase the land and the Sheriff’s Office would need to staff one more jail.
Related Recommendations (1)
R9
San Mateo County owns the property upon which the new jail is proposed to be built. If the new facility is not large enough to accommodate the projected growth in the jail population, the need in the future to built an additional jail facility will be far more expensive because the county may need to purchase the land and the Sheriff’s Office would need to staff one more jail. Response: The respondent agrees with the conclusion; however the actual jail site location has not yet been selected. Our Jail Planning Unit is working closely with the Board of Supervisors, County Manager’s Office and criminal justice stakeholders in planning for and securing a replacement jail facility that will meet our current estimates of approximately six hundred and forty-eight (648) beds for a combination of pre-trial and sentenced inmate populations. The timeliness of our ability to move forward with the project, length of anticipated construction time and the identification of future spatial needs are critical to the success and cost-effectiveness of the project. Our strategy is to use a participative process of planning and information sharing in each step of development. Community outreach efforts are on-going. Meetings are being set up in various locations within the county to communicate with the residents of our need for a new replacement facility, the type of facility that will be built, and the various inmate programs and services that will be offered in order to reduce the recidivism rate in San Mateo County. We have also dedicated a public space on our website (www.smcsheriff.com) of jail planning frequently asked questions for information sharing and public education. Recommendations: San Mateo County Board of Supervisors directs the County Manager to:

Conclusions 16

No Responses Found 2

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

San Mateo County Board of Supervisors Elected County Office
San Mateo County Sheriff Elected County Office