San Bernardino County Grand Jury
• 2008-2009
Committee Economic DEVElOPMENT Economic Development Committee
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 4 findings
F1
The Grand Jury found Workforce Development Department functioning well despite the economic downturn. It has developed a proactive job placement base in the One Stop Employment Centers. The agency currently operates these centers in three strategic locations of the County: Rancho Cucamonga (visited by the Grand Jury), San Bernardino and Victorville. The Rancho Cucamonga location is a full-employment center that screens applicants for the best job suited to the individual. Job placements are based on the applicant’s training and experience. The Center also offers enhanced career training and retraining for career changes where applicable. This training is fully-funded by the Federal Government. The Department solicits and maintains a list of numerous industry and business companies who partner with the County in order to place customers in employment. The Department is active in expanding areas of opportunity with a group of 11 individuals from Workforce Development who search the field and are required to make 44 new contacts per month. The quota for the department is 500 new listings per month. The Resource Room has a large number of computers which customers use for testing, training, job search of their data banks, completing applications and other tasks. Several Center employees are in the room to assist in computer usage. These resources are above and beyond those supplied by the State Employment Development Department (EDD). In addition, the department works in conjunction with IVEDA and VVEDA. Applicants are usually interviewed by a placement specialist and have the goal of one hour to complete the original application.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
The Grand Jury visited IVEDA and VVEDA. Both airports are in a functional capacity, but operating differently. Both airports cooperate with the EDA to support satellite business and industries which benefit from air, rail and trucking transport. IVEDA plans to operate as a completely functional passenger airport by the end of
Related Recommendations (1)
R09-23
All agencies involved take into consideration these time restraints and complete the project within the time limit or get an extension. (Findings 2 and 3)
F3
Only five years remain to complete the project as a result of delays due to problems and finances with water rights.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
Some residents feel they are not informed by Redevelopment about plans, progress, and meetings, even though Redevelopment stated that notices have been posted.
Related Recommendations (1)
R09-24
Provide direct mailings to residents regarding plans, progress, and meetings to ensure that everyone residing in the project area is informed on a regular basis. (Finding 4) 24
Commendations 2
-
CM1 Page 5The Grand Jury found a highly functioning Workforce Development Department whose vision focuses on a strong, proactive job placement for its clients. Eleven employees of the Workforce Development Department are in the field, making contact with prospective employers. These employees generate in excess of 500 new listings each month. During these challenging economic times this is a commendable effort. The services being provided by the One Stop Employment Resource center to individuals seeking employment exceed the services provided by the State Employment Development Department. 22
-
CM2 Page 6REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CEDAR GLEN