📋
Extraído del Informe Consolidado

Esta investigación fue publicada originalmente como parte de un informe consolidado más amplio que contiene múltiples investigaciones. Consulte el PDF consolidado para ver el documento completo.

Los Angeles County Grand Jury • 1974-1975

Juvenile Justice, Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs Committee

Published: ∼ June 30, 1975
View PDF View Full Original

Note: Missing finding numbers detected: F6, F8

Findings 11 findings

F1
The Grand Jury recommends that enabling legislation be enacted to set the remuneration of the members of the Board of Supervisors at 125% of that paid Superior Court judges and the District Attorney's salary at 120% of that paid Superior Court judges. GEORGE E. COWGILL, Chairman LAWRENCE GREENER PAUL B. CRAMER, Vice-chairman ELMER H. MEYER ROSE S. HACKMAN, Secretary IESSE L. ROBINSON II. The Criminal Complaints Committee The Criminal Complaints Committee has specific responsibilities in matters Purpose and involving the Grand Jury's response to requests for criminal investigations and Scope prosecution. Areas of These include: Concern A. Case control: The decision as to which cases brought by the District Attorney will be heard for possible indictment by the Grand Jury. B. The review of written requests from the public for Grand Jury assistance in what may be criminal matters. C. The investigation and recommendation of action in requests from County officials for criminal investigations. Summary of Investigations A. Case Control In the first 10 months of the Grand Jury's term, the Criminal Complaints Com- mittee accepted 25 cases from the District Attorney and declined to hear 3. Indictments were brought in 25 cases involving 88 defendants. The jury declined to indict 3 defendants. As of May 1, 1975, of the 85 defendants indicted, 10 had been convicted, 2 were dismissed and 73 were awaiting trial. Slightly more than one-third of this Grand Jury's time was devoted to hearing cases for indictment. B. Requests from There were 201 communications concerning criminal matters received by the the public Grand Jury during the first ten months of its term, of which 117 were from private citizens. Of these, 18 were considered of sufficient importance to be referred to the District Attorney's Special Investigations Division for investigation. Thirty-eight were answered directly after consultation with the Grand Jury legal advisor. Many letters involved matters not within the jurisdiction of the Grand Jury. Of these, 14 were referred to other agencies. Other correspondence directed to the Criminal Complaints Committee was acknowledged with an explanation and whatever helpful information seemed appropriate. C. Requests from There were 12 requests for criminal investigations received from county officials. County Officials One resulted in a criminal indictment by the Grand Jury. In the others, the committee and the jury did not find evidence to justify criminal prosecution. The Criminal Complaints Committee is concerned that many of these requests Comment and the accusations on which they were based received widespread publicity before they were referred to the Grand Jury. Whenever the jury finds there is no reason to prosecute criminally, that decision receives little or no public notice. A traditional role of the grand jury and a justification for its rules of secrecy is the protection of innocent persons from ill-founded charges. This protection is violated when charges are made public without equal opportunity for refuta- tion. Premature publicity creates an unfair impression which can be damaging to innocent persons, departmental morale and public confidence. This does not imply that Grand Jury confidentiality is a shield for criminal wrongdoers. When a grand jury investigation results in a criminal indictment, the transcript later becomes public, and there is opportunity for the press to report it.
F2
The Grand Jury recommends that the Food Stamp program, if it is not cashed out as suggested above, be transferred from the Department of Agriculture to the Department of Health, Education and Welfare. B. A Ceiling on Gross Federal law has encouraged Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) Income of AFDC recipients to secure employment and leave the welfare roles by providing incen- Recipients tives applicable to earned income. However, because of the lack of legislative safeguards and controls, abuses are not uncommon.
F3
The Grand Jury recommends that a relative be paid Foster Care Parents' rates for a foster care child when that relative would not otherwise be able to care for the child because of lack of financial means. At this time the child should be taken off welfare and put under the Foster Care Pro- gram. Care should be exercised that abuses in this program do not occur.
F4
The Grand Jury recommends that a substantial increase be made in the payment of all categories of foster child care. The Committee learned as a result of the Special Committee hearings in the G. Study of Economic, city of Compton that the Compton community is gravely concerned with their Employment and deteriorating economic situation. We were informed that Compton has an un- Crime in employment rate of 18 percent, the highest in the County, and that 58 percent Depressed Areas in of the population is on some form of public assistance. This situation must Los Angeles County be corrected because it is getting worse.
F5
Temple City Sheriff's Station-There is no audio or video system to sup- plement personnel surveillance. No suitable area is available for confiden- tial attorney consultation. The Grand Jury makes the following recommendations to the Los Angeles Police Department: 6. 77th Street Division-The facility is old and undersized, and a new station is needed.
F7
Van Nuys Valley Station-Needs air conditioning in cells. Venice Station—Needs air conditioning in cells, and floors should be resurfaced. San Fernando City Jail—An audio and/or video system should be in- stalled to supplement personnel surveillance. The gun locker should be compartmented. There is no safety cell available and one should be in- stalled immediately. Compton City Jail—A safety cell is needed.
F9
Public the Grand Jury to investigate sales, transfers and ownership of land which, Administrator- under the state laws, might or should escheat to the state. Nothing was discov- Public Guardian ered in the audit to indicate that statutory requirements were not being com- plied with. The contract auditor made the following recommendations: as that provided by a file index (Recommendation No. 9-5). Summary of Recommendations: (No. 9-7) Eliminate photocopies or other dupli- Public Administrator-Public Guardian cate copies of documents from estate files. (No. 9-1) Require the investigation and explana- (No. 9-8) Establish procedures to insure supervi- tion of discrepancies between initial examination sory review of the status of delinquencies on notes reports, property sheets and/or amounts deposited receivable. in the Public Administrator's vault or placed in the (No. 9-9) Take steps to decrease the amount of time required for processing requests for payment. warehouse. (No. 9-10) Adhere to established procedures to (No. 9-2) Establish written procedures and criteria insure that all check requests result either in the for the investigation and administration of estates. issuance of checks or notification to Property Mana- (No. 9-3) Develop control procedures and meth- gement as to the reasons for nonpayment. ods for the maintenance of estate files. (No. 9-4) Establish a central control listing of ac- (No. 9-11) Establish procedures to accelerate the processing and recording of rental receipts. tive estates that indicates the status and persons re- (No. 9-12) Send delinquency and eviction notices sponsible for their handling. on a timely basis. (No. 9-5) Design and implement a cover sheet list- ing required documentation or steps to be taken. (No. 9-13) Consider possible alternative methods Provide space for the date and name or initials of for rental of property to improve the occupancy rate. persons obtaining required documentation or per- (No. 9-14) Determine early in the administration forming required functions. of an estate whether real property should be sold (No. 9-6) File materials in a logical sequence, such or distributed in kind.
F10
Treasurer-Tax The last Grand Jury audit of this department occurred in 1970 which prompted Collector us to ask Coopers & Lybrand to conduct this review. They had the following
F11
Arcadia City Jail-The overhead bars in the cells should be enclosed in wire mesh to prevent hanging.
F12
Purchasing and This department was audited because a full audit by the Grand Jury had not Stores Department been conducted for several years, and Mr. H. E. Davis, Jr., Purchasing Agent, requested an audit. The contract auditor had the following recommendations: Summary of Recommendations: Purchasing and Stores Department (No. 12-1) Review County-wide inventories and (No. 12-5) Establish the Standard Operating Pro- determine whether savings can be realized by con- cedures Manual as a loose-leaf document. solidating additional inventories or items under the (No. 12-6) Organize the additions and changes to control of Central Stores. the Standard Operating Procedures Manual so they are cross-referenced and distributed to the manual (No. 12-2) Develop a program to reverse the re- cent trend of declining inventory turnover. holders. (No. 12-3) Develop procedures to compile and re- (No. 12-7) Establish a standard format for the Stan- port additional operating data for the purchasing dard Operating Procedures Manual. activity. (No. 12-8) Develop formal training programs for (No. 12-4) Take steps to accelerate completion of deputy purchasing agents. project to update the Standard Operating Proce- (No. 12-9) Obtain formal vendor evaluations from dures Manual. user departments when renewing contracts. (No. 12-10) Strengthen procedures for review and determine the most effective way to meet present approval of POC's in payment of freight invoices. and future requirements. (No. 12-11) Enforce adherence to monetary limits (No. 12-18) Establish uniform guidelines for the indicated on the Purchase Order Checks. scope and frequency of internal reviews of purchas- (No. 12-12) Establish controls over the issuance ing personnel. and processing of Purchase Order Check forms. (No. 12-19) Develop uniform procedures and gui- (No. 12-13) Limit access to blank Purchase Order delines for circumstances in which Traffic Section Check forms. should prepare a shipping cost analysis. (No. 12-14) Establish more stringent controls over (No. 12-20) Develop additional data on freight the accessibility of the facsimile signature plate. costs by vendor and location. (No. 12-15) Establish high priority for early imple- (No. 12-21) Establish formal procedures for ob- mentation of corrective action to eliminate bottle- taining and documenting a Traffic review of trans- necks in typing purchasing documents. portation costs. (No. 12-22) Consider the use of an outside service (No. 12-16) Establish procedure requiring supervi- sory review of all large purchases over a predeter- to audit freight classifications and rates. mined amount. (No. 12-23) Review staffing of the Traffic Section in relation to duties performed. (No. 12-17) Review the record retention system to The very sizeable budget of this department prompted us to ask for a "scoping"
F13
Insurance of the department. The contract auditor reported after his initial review that "the major portion of budgeted expenditures for insurance relate to employee benefit plans," and that "the county is selfinsured for most property damage and liability risks with some exceptions." Upon receipt of this information it was decided against proceeding further with the audit. Summary of Committee Investigations A. Questionnaire Penal Code Section 928 requires the Grand Jury to investigate the needs of on Needs of all county officers. To accomplish this it was decided that a questionnaire be County Officers formulated and sent to all department heads. The replies received were com- plete, informative, and thoughtful, and the Grand Jury expresses appreciation to those who prepared them. After careful review of all the replies, pertinent information relating to needs, suggestions, etc., was extracted from the reports, compiled into booklets and forwarded to the Supervisors, Department Heads, or Officers who would be most interested in the information. B. Legislation At the start of our term it was pointed out in a County Counsel's opinion that the Grand Jury was not authorized by Penal Code Section 926 to contract with an independent auditor for management audits of county departments but was limited to the payment for a fiscal audit only. The committee agreed that the solution was to obtain a legislative change authorizing the payment to a contract auditor for management-type audits. Assemblyman Knox was contacted and agreed to amend AB 4424, a bill involv- ing Grand Juries, to include our proposed change. The bill was passed, signed by the Governor. It is now possible for all grand juries in California to pay for management as well as fiscal audits. C. Salaries of It is the responsibility of the Grand Jury impaneled in an even numbered year to investigate and report upon the salaries of the District Attorney and the Certain County Officers County Auditor. The Grand Jury may also investigate and report upon the sa- laries of the Board of Supervisors as often as may be required. It is the feeling of the Grand Jury that in view of their responsibilities the County Board of Supervisors should be the highest paid officers in the county. This would recognize their importance as the governing body of the county and at the same time eliminate the tendency towards a compaction of salaries of other officers of the county. The salary of the District Attorney was found to be inadequate because it is creating a salary compaction. The salary of the County Auditor-Controller was found to be adequate. Howev- er, we did note a disparity in salary levels of his Division Chiefs which should be reviewed.

Recommendations 26

Conclusions 5

Comments 4