Santa Cruz County Grand Jury
• 2005-2006
• Agency Response
Final Report and Responses Counting Your Dollars: Contracting for the Services of an Independent Auditor
⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 7 findings
F1
It has been the practice of the county to request proposals for independent audit services every three or four years. Response: Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors AGREES.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
The County of Santa Cruz Auditor should continue to actively seek and qualify new bidders for future invitations for proposals and should update the current list. Response: Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors AGREES. This recommendation has been implemented. The Auditor-Controller’s Office continuously adds qualified CPA firms to the bidder list. Staff members attend professional meetings and conferences and maintain contact with other California Auditor-Controller Offices, both of which are excellent sources of information regarding qualified audit firms. Response: Santa Cruz County Auditor-Controller AGREES. This recommendation has been implemented. The Auditor-Controller’s Office continuously adds qualified CPA firms to the bidder list. Staff members attend professional meetings and conferences and maintain contact with other California Auditor-Controller Offices, both of which are excellent sources of information regarding qualified audit firms.
F2
The current independent audit firm has provided services for seven years. Response: Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors DISAGREES. - 2 Counting Your Dollars: Contracting for the Services of an Independent Auditor of County Finances 2004 – 2005 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report and Responses The current audit firm, Vargas and Company, served as the county’s auditor for six years; from fiscal year 1998-99 to fiscal year 2003-04.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Review of the contract for independent audit services or invitation to bid should be scheduled every three years with no one firm providing services for more than two consecutive three-year contracts. Response: Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors AGREES. This recommendation has been implemented. Review of the contract for independent audit services or invitation to bid is scheduled every three years. Although there is a definite benefit to changing auditing firms at least every six years, it may not always be in the county’s best interest to prohibit a firm from submitting a bid for a third term. After reviewing the proposals for audit services with the Auditor-Controller, the County Audit Committee recommends to the Board of Supervisors the best-qualified and most cost-effective auditing firm. Response: Santa Cruz County Auditor-Controller AGREES. - 4 Counting Your Dollars: Contracting for the Services of an Independent Auditor of County Finances 2004 – 2005 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report and Responses This recommendation has been implemented. Review of the contract for independent audit services or invitation to bid is scheduled every three years. There is a definite benefit to changing auditing firms at least every six years. However, it may not be in the county’s best interest to prohibit a firm submitting a bid for a third term. That firm may clearly be the best qualified and most cost effective. For example, during the most recent audit selection process, the county was fortunate to have a well-qualified firm submit a competing bid that was comparable to the bid submitted by the incumbent firm. Only two other firms submitted bids; one firm was clearly unqualified and the other firm was $40,000 (62%) higher each year. If a competitive bid had not been received from a challenging firm, the county could have been faced with some difficult choices. Response: On behalf of the Santa Cruz County Audit Committee, the Auditor- Controller AGREES. This recommendation has been implemented. Review of the contract for independent audit services or invitation to bid is scheduled every three years. There is a definite benefit to changing auditing firms at least every six years. After reviewing the proposals for audit services with the Auditor-Controller, the County Audit Committee recommends to the Board of Supervisors the best-qualified and most cost-effective auditing firm.
F3
The 2001-2002 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report recommended that retention of an independent auditor should be reviewed every three years and changed at least every six years. Response: Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors AGREES. Response: Santa Cruz County Auditor-Controller AGREES. Response: On behalf of the Santa Cruz County Audit Committee, the Auditor- Controller AGREES.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
The County of Santa Cruz should continue to notify the Grand Jury of County Audit Committee activities. Response: Santa Cruz County Auditor-Controller AGREES. This recommendation has been implemented. The Auditor-Controller considers the Grand Jury an essential component of the audit process and the County Audit Committee.
F4
This Request for Proposal process was to select an independent auditor to prepare an annual audit for the County of Santa Cruz beginning with the fiscal year ending June 30, 2005. The contract would be awarded for one to three years, whichever would be the most cost effective for the county.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
The County Audit Committee should continue to meet at least twice each year, more frequently if needed. Response: Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors AGREES. This recommendation has been implemented. The County Audit Committee meets at least twice annually. The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report and the related Management Letter comments and responses are reviewed at one meeting, and the kick-off of the annual county audit is conducted at another meeting. The County Audit Committee holds additional meetings to review the request for proposal for audit services during years in which one is being prepared. Response: Santa Cruz County Auditor-Controller AGREES. This recommendation has been implemented. The County Audit Committee meets at least twice annually. The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report and the related Management Letter comments and responses are reviewed at one meeting, and the Counting Your Dollars: - 5 Contracting for the Services of an Independent Auditor of County Finances 2004 – 2005 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report and Responses kick-off of the annual county audit is conducted at another meeting. The County Audit Committee holds additional meetings to review the request for proposal for audit services during years in which one is being prepared. Response: On behalf of the Santa Cruz County Audit Committee, the Auditor- Controller AGREES. This recommendation has been implemented. The County Audit Committee meets at least twice annually. The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report and the related Management Letter comments and responses are reviewed at one meeting, and the kick-off of the annual county audit is conducted at another meeting. The County Audit Committee holds additional meetings to review the request for proposal for audit services during years in which one is being prepared.
F5
The independent audit firm provides various reports to the Santa Cruz County Audit Committee throughout the year. These reports require County Audit Committee review.
No recommendations for this finding
F6
The Request for Proposal process began with preparation of the bid documents that: • outlined the requirements of the county; • described the basis on which the bids would be judged; and • requested the qualifications of the bidders. Invitations to Bid were sent to 44 qualifying accounting firms, locally and throughout northern and central California. Four bidders attended the bidders’ conference on December 10, 2004. Proposals were received on January 14, 2005 from all four firms present at the bidders’ conference. The proposals were evaluated according to the criteria established in the bid documents as outlined in Appendix A. Using this comprehensive criteria, the County Audit Committee recommended awarding the contract to the firm that best met the county’s needs: Bartig, Basler, and Ray.
No recommendations for this finding
F7
Two members of the Santa Cruz County Grand Jury are active members of the County Audit Committee. Response: On behalf of the Santa Cruz County Audit Committee, the Auditor- Controller AGREES. Conclusions
No recommendations for this finding
Conclusions 4
-
CL1Response to Santa Cruz County’s request for proposals was minimal. Counting Your Dollars: Page 1 - 3 Contracting for the Services of an Independent Auditor of County Finances 2004 – 2005 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report and Responses
-
CL2The County Audit Committee did not follow the recommendation of the 2001-2002 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury stating that independent audit services should be reviewed every three years with no one firm providing services for more than two consecutive three-year contracts. Good accounting practices and procedures dictate a change of auditing firms.
-
CL3Criteria used to evaluate bids were comprehensive.
-
CL4Grand Jury membership on Santa Cruz County Audit Committee fulfills the Grand Jury’s mandated responsibilities as outlined in Penal Code § 925. The County Audit Committee met four times during fiscal year 2004-2005.