Score: +23
(39/47/16)
Marin County Grand Jury
• 2024-2025
Sea Level Rise: The Water is Upon Us We Cannot Run - We Cannot Hide
Published: May 31, 2024
29 pages
⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 6 findings
F1
A comprehensive countywide agency is necessary to effectively address the impacts of sea level rise in Marin County.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
The Board of Supervisors, in collaboration with Marin county cities, towns, Bel Marin Keys Community Services District and Marin Water should create a comprehensive countywide agency with authority to plan and implement adaptation efforts addressing the impacts of sea level rise in Marin County.
F2
To be effective, a countywide agency created to address sea level rise in Marin County should include the County of Marin, all cities and towns, and appropriate special districts in Marin County as funding participants.
Related Recommendations (2)
R1
The Board of Supervisors, in collaboration with Marin county cities, towns, Bel Marin Keys Community Services District and Marin Water should create a comprehensive countywide agency with authority to plan and implement adaptation efforts addressing the impacts of sea level rise in Marin County.
R2
The Board of Supervisors should actively enlist the participation and support of state and federal legislators toward the creation and funding of this comprehensive countywide agency.
F3
The complete failure to create and implement effective countywide sea level rise adaptation projects in Marin County will result in significant damages and losses to commercial and residential properties as well as infrastructure, both public and private.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
The 2034 deadline imposed by Sections 30985-30985.8 of the California Public Resources Code for each California county to submit its official sea level rise mitigation plan is “too little too late” for Marin county, and delaying action until then will expose coastal and Bay areas to unnecessary flooding risks, financial and other losses.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
Under-represented populations reside in areas that are severely vulnerable to sea level rise because they are in low-lying ground.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
The Board of Supervisors should require the newly created countywide entity to create plans that recognize and address sea level rise exposure and the specific risks to the populations in the Canal District, Marin City, specific areas in Novato, and all low-lying geographic regions where lower income populations reside. The plan should identify and address the risks impacting those populations, which include: (a) risks of becoming stranded due to inaccessible roads; (b) lack of transportation if evacuations are called; (c) mold that may grow inside their homes; (d) exposure to infectious diseases due to contaminated standing water; (e) need to relocate temporarily or permanently as a result of floods; and (f) other community-specific risks identified in regional assessments.
F6
Sea level rise plans to be developed by a countywide entity should include adaptation strategies that directly apply to under-represented communities in low-lying areas with great exposure to sea level rise, such as the Canal District, areas of Novato, and Marin City, among others.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
The Board of Supervisors should require the newly created countywide entity to create plans that recognize and address sea level rise exposure and the specific risks to the populations in the Canal District, Marin City, specific areas in Novato, and all low-lying geographic regions where lower income populations reside. The plan should identify and address the risks impacting those populations, which include: (a) risks of becoming stranded due to inaccessible roads; (b) lack of transportation if evacuations are called; (c) mold that may grow inside their homes; (d) exposure to infectious diseases due to contaminated standing water; (e) need to relocate temporarily or permanently as a result of floods; and (f) other community-specific risks identified in regional assessments.
Agency Responses 15
Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.
▶
County of Marin Board of Supervisors[PDF]
January 12, 2021
•
5 pages
• 5 responses
•
Score: +4
(+4, 1, 0)
View Details ▾
5 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
A comprehensive countywide agency is necessary to effectively address the impacts of sea level rise in Marin County.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
agree with the findings numbered: FI-2, F5 ■ We disagree wholly or partially with the findings numbered: F3-F4 GRAND JURY RECOMMENDATIONS ■ Recommendation numbered RI has been implemen EAnt1cJry I)1A0d1 Date: Signed: Dennis Rodoni,'President Mann County Board of Supervisors
County of Mann Response to Grand Jury Report Findings and Recommendations "Reading, Writing, and Therapy: Mental Health Challenges in Our Schools" October 23, 2020 RESPONSE TO GRAND JURY FINDINGS F1.
F2
To be effective, a countywide agency created to address sea level rise in Marin County should include the County of Marin, all cities and towns, and appropriate special districts in Marin County as funding participants.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Agree. Strategy 6 of the Mann County Suicide Prevention Strategic Plan is an important resource in planning and implementation. The Mann Schools Wellness Collaborative is leading the implementation of key activities related to Strategy 6. As a partner in this effort, the Mann County Suicide Prevention Collaborative and Schools Team meets regularly. One current area of focus with these entities includes suicide prevention training and education across districts for students, educators, mental health providers and parents, as well as mental health screening and suicide risk assessment. F3. To he...
F3
The complete failure to create and implement effective countywide sea level rise adaptation projects in Marin County will result in significant damages and losses to commercial and residential properties as well as infrastructure, both public and private.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
agree with the findings numbered: FI-2, F5 ■ We disagree wholly or partially with the findings numbered: F3-F4 GRAND JURY RECOMMENDATIONS ■ Recommendation numbered RI has been implemen EAnt1cJry I)1A0d1 Date: Signed: Dennis Rodoni,'President Mann County Board of Supervisors
County of Mann Response to Grand Jury Report Findings and Recommendations "Reading, Writing, and Therapy: Mental Health Challenges in Our Schools" October 23, 2020 RESPONSE TO GRAND JURY FINDINGS F1.
F4
The 2034 deadline imposed by Sections 30985-30985.8 of the California Public Resources Code for each California county to submit its official sea level rise mitigation plan is “too little too late” for Marin county, and delaying action until then will expose coastal and Bay areas to unnecessary flooding risks, financial and other losses.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
agree with the findings numbered: FI-2, F5 ■ We disagree wholly or partially with the findings numbered: F3-F4 GRAND JURY RECOMMENDATIONS ■ Recommendation numbered RI has been implemen EAnt1cJry I)1A0d1 Date: Signed: Dennis Rodoni,'President Mann County Board of Supervisors
County of Mann Response to Grand Jury Report Findings and Recommendations "Reading, Writing, and Therapy: Mental Health Challenges in Our Schools" October 23, 2020 RESPONSE TO GRAND JURY FINDINGS F1.
F5
Under-represented populations reside in areas that are severely vulnerable to sea level rise because they are in low-lying ground.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
agree with the findings numbered: FI-2, F5 ■ We disagree wholly or partially with the findings numbered: F3-F4 GRAND JURY RECOMMENDATIONS ■ Recommendation numbered RI has been implemen EAnt1cJry I)1A0d1 Date: Signed: Dennis Rodoni,'President Mann County Board of Supervisors
County of Mann Response to Grand Jury Report Findings and Recommendations "Reading, Writing, and Therapy: Mental Health Challenges in Our Schools" October 23, 2020 RESPONSE TO GRAND JURY FINDINGS F1.
▶
Marin County Board of Supervisors[PDF]
September 24, 2024
•
7 pages
• 9 responses
•
Score: -1
(+2, 4, -3)
View Details ▾
9 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
A comprehensive countywide agency is necessary to effectively address the impacts of sea level rise in Marin County.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
agree with the finding numbered: F7 - We disagree wholly or partially with the findings numbered: F1 - F6, F8 .
R1
The Board of Supervisors, in collaboration with Marin county cities, towns, Bel Marin Keys Community Services District and Marin Water should create a comprehensive countywide agency with authority to plan and implement adaptation efforts addressing the impacts of sea level rise in Marin County.
Response: Will Not Implement
Score: -1
Disagree The Marin County Jail opened in 1994. A 2014 study by the Public Policy Institute of California found that 89 of California's 123 county jails were constructed before 1990 (updated to 116 total active county jails in 2023). In 2024, the Board of Supervisors budgeted over $2.5 million in modernization and maintenance work to the jail facility. The Marin County Jail is well-maintained and is not considered dated by any industry standard. The Marin County Jail has passed annual Title 15 and Title 24 inspections since opening. These inspections have been carried out by the Board of State ...
F2
To be effective, a countywide agency created to address sea level rise in Marin County should include the County of Marin, all cities and towns, and appropriate special districts in Marin County as funding participants.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Disagree Although Assembly Bill 109 public safety realignment has affected the complexity of the Jail Classification System in California, the Marin County Jail design continues to provide incarcerated persons with adequate space for quality, comprehensive programming. The complexities created by AB109 have in some ways been mitigated by a decrease in the Average Daily Population (ADP) in the County Jail. In 2018, the ADP was 320 incarcerated persons. Currently, the ADP is averaging approximately 220 (where it has remained for at least the past six months). Marin County Sheriff Classification ...
R2
The Board of Supervisors should actively enlist the participation and support of state and federal legislators toward the creation and funding of this comprehensive countywide agency.
Response: Will Not Implement
Score: -1
Disagree The Marin County Jail opened in 1994. A 2014 study by the Public Policy Institute of California found that 89 of California's 123 county jails were constructed before 1990 (updated to 116 total active county jails in 2023). In 2024, the Board of Supervisors budgeted over $2.5 million in modernization and maintenance work to the jail facility. The Marin County Jail is well-maintained and is not considered dated by any industry standard. The Marin County Jail has passed annual Title 15 and Title 24 inspections since opening. These inspections have been carried out by the Board of State ...
F3
The complete failure to create and implement effective countywide sea level rise adaptation projects in Marin County will result in significant damages and losses to commercial and residential properties as well as infrastructure, both public and private.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Disagree We have no evidence to suggest there is insufficient space in the Marin County Jail to address the mental health and substance use needs of the incarcerated population. The Marin County Sheriff's Office contracts behavioral health services from the Marin County Health and Human Services (HHS) Division of Behavioral Health Services (BHRS). These services exceed industry standards for mental health care in jail facilities. Collaboration with BHRS has been instrumental in proactively implementing improvements, and services are certified annually by the BSCC.
June 28, 2024 In 2023, the S...
R3
The Board of Supervisors should require the newly created countywide entity to create plans that recognize and address sea level rise exposure and the specific risks to the populations in the Canal District, Marin City, specific areas in Novato, and all low-lying geographic regions where lower income populations reside. The plan should identify and address the risks impacting those populations, which include: (a) risks of becoming stranded due to inaccessible roads; (b) lack of transportation if...
Response: Will Not Implement
Score: -1
Disagree The Marin County Jail opened in 1994. A 2014 study by the Public Policy Institute of California found that 89 of California's 123 county jails were constructed before 1990 (updated to 116 total active county jails in 2023). In 2024, the Board of Supervisors budgeted over $2.5 million in modernization and maintenance work to the jail facility. The Marin County Jail is well-maintained and is not considered dated by any industry standard. The Marin County Jail has passed annual Title 15 and Title 24 inspections since opening. These inspections have been carried out by the Board of State ...
F4
The 2034 deadline imposed by Sections 30985-30985.8 of the California Public Resources Code for each California county to submit its official sea level rise mitigation plan is “too little too late” for Marin county, and delaying action until then will expose coastal and Bay areas to unnecessary flooding risks, financial and other losses.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Disagree It is inaccurate to state that the Jail does not provide adequate space for programming to serve the needs of the current inmate population. The Average Daily Population (ADP) in custody has been declining steadily since 2018, leaving more multipurpose space per individual. All housing units within the jail, except for one, have multipurpose rooms equipped with multi-media connectivity and provide adequate space for groups, meetings, and activities. All individuals incarcerated at the jail can access tablet devices located in the unit where they reside. These tablets provide access to...
F5
Under-represented populations reside in areas that are severely vulnerable to sea level rise because they are in low-lying ground.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Partially Disagree We cannot comment on the expansion potential of the of the Marin County Jail without a proper study by facilities and construction experts. However, it should be noted that the County's responses to items F2-F4 above address the space needs mentioned in the Grand Jury's report without the prohibitive costs of new construction. F6. The Marin County Juvenile Hall is a dated, prison-like facility that does not create the restorative justice atmosphere of a modern-day juvenile detention facility. Response: Partially Disagree
June 28, 2024 While we agree that the Juvenile Hall f...
F6
Sea level rise plans to be developed by a countywide entity should include adaptation strategies that directly apply to under-represented communities in low-lying areas with great exposure to sea level rise, such as the Canal District, areas of Novato, and Marin City, among others.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
agree with the finding numbered: F7 - We disagree wholly or partially with the findings numbered: F1 - F6, F8 .
▶
Marin County Board of Supervisors[PDF]
September 10, 2024
•
11 pages
• 7 responses
•
Score: 0
(+3, 1, -3)
View Details ▾
7 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
A comprehensive countywide agency is necessary to effectively address the impacts of sea level rise in Marin County.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
agree with the findings numbered: F1, F3, F9, F12-F13
We disagree wholly or partially with the findings numbered: F2, F4-F8, F10-F11, F14
<b>GRAND JURY RECOMMENDATIONS</b> Recommendations numbered R1-R8 will not be implemented because they are not
warranted or reasonable.
R1
The Board of Supervisors, in collaboration with Marin county cities, towns, Bel Marin Keys Community Services District and Marin Water should create a comprehensive countywide agency with authority to plan and implement adaptation efforts addressing the impacts of sea level rise in Marin County.
Response: Will Not Implement
Score: -1
Agree The County agrees that adults aged 60 and above are a growing population in Marin. Many population groups in Marin are at increased risk of falling into homelessness, due primarily to the increased cost of living and lack of affordable housing. This includes low-income adults, parents and children, foster youth, justice-involved individuals, as well as older adults. F2. The lack of a mandate for aging equity by the Marin County Board of Supervisors results in the County not prioritizing the needs of adults aged 60 and above who are homeless or at risk of falling into homelessness. Respon...
F2
To be effective, a countywide agency created to address sea level rise in Marin County should include the County of Marin, all cities and towns, and appropriate special districts in Marin County as funding participants.
Response: Disagree
Score: -1
above, the County employees a variety of strategies, rooted in several departments, to address the myriad of factors that contribute to County of Marin Response to Grand Jury Findings and Recommendations
200 "Older Adults on the Brink of Homelessness: Time to Act is Now" (June 21, 2024) homelessness. Older adults experience homelessness for largely the same reasons as any other age demographic, including the high cost of housing in an unrestrained market, and a variety of social and economic factors. No single system can address all factors that contribute to homelessness. The County consider...
F3
The complete failure to create and implement effective countywide sea level rise adaptation projects in Marin County will result in significant damages and losses to commercial and residential properties as well as infrastructure, both public and private.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
agree with the findings numbered: F1, F3, F9, F12-F13
We disagree wholly or partially with the findings numbered: F2, F4-F8, F10-F11, F14
<b>GRAND JURY RECOMMENDATIONS</b> Recommendations numbered R1-R8 will not be implemented because they are not
warranted or reasonable.
F4
The 2034 deadline imposed by Sections 30985-30985.8 of the California Public Resources Code for each California county to submit its official sea level rise mitigation plan is “too little too late” for Marin county, and delaying action until then will expose coastal and Bay areas to unnecessary flooding risks, financial and other losses.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
agree with the findings numbered: F1, F3, F9, F12-F13
We disagree wholly or partially with the findings numbered: F2, F4-F8, F10-F11, F14
<b>GRAND JURY RECOMMENDATIONS</b> Recommendations numbered R1-R8 will not be implemented because they are not
warranted or reasonable.
F5
Under-represented populations reside in areas that are severely vulnerable to sea level rise because they are in low-lying ground.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Partially Disagree There are many factors that result in a loss of housing for individuals. These include housing costs and affordable housing availability as well as a variety of social, economic, and health factors. As discussed in the response to F2 above, the County employees a variety of strategies, rooted in several departments, to address the myriad of factors that contribute to County of Marin Response to Grand Jury Findings and Recommendations
200 "Older Adults on the Brink of Homelessness: Time to Act is Now" (June 21, 2024) homelessness. Older adults experience homelessness for lar...
F6
Sea level rise plans to be developed by a countywide entity should include adaptation strategies that directly apply to under-represented communities in low-lying areas with great exposure to sea level rise, such as the Canal District, areas of Novato, and Marin City, among others.
Response: Disagree
Score: -1
Disagree As described previously, the County has prioritized a cross-departmental and cross-functional Housing First strategy as its approach to addressing homelessness. There is no strategic plan that identifies a single County agency that is exclusively responsible for homelessness prevention. Instead, the County's approach to addressing homelessness, including homelessness in the older adult population, leverages funding, expertise, and capacity of multiple County departments, nonprofit partners, municipalities, special districts, and external government agencies. The County looks forward t...
▶
Marin County Board of Supervisors[PDF]
August 20, 2024
•
6 pages
• 9 responses
•
Score: +4
(+6, 1, -2)
View Details ▾
9 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
A comprehensive countywide agency is necessary to effectively address the impacts of sea level rise in Marin County.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
above, we cannot agree conclusively that this goal is best served by a new agency. The analysis referenced in the
R1
The Board of Supervisors, in collaboration with Marin county cities, towns, Bel Marin Keys Community Services District and Marin Water should create a comprehensive countywide agency with authority to plan and implement adaptation efforts addressing the impacts of sea level rise in Marin County.
Response: Will Not Implement
Score: -1
R1, R3 will not be implemented because they are not
warranted or reasonable Recommendations numbered R2 has not been implemented and will be implemented in the
future Denn J.
F2
To be effective, a countywide agency created to address sea level rise in Marin County should include the County of Marin, all cities and towns, and appropriate special districts in Marin County as funding participants.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
agree with the finding numbered: F3
We disagree wholly or partially with the findings numbered: F1 - F2; F4 - F6
<b>GRAND JURY RECOMMENDATIONS</b> Recommendation numbered R1, R3 will not be implemented because they are not
warranted or reasonable Recommendations numbered R2 has not been implemented and will be implemented in the
future Denn J.
R2
The Board of Supervisors should actively enlist the participation and support of state and federal legislators toward the creation and funding of this comprehensive countywide agency.
Response: Will Implement
Score: +1
R2 has not been implemented and will be implemented in the
future Denn J.
F3
The complete failure to create and implement effective countywide sea level rise adaptation projects in Marin County will result in significant damages and losses to commercial and residential properties as well as infrastructure, both public and private.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
agree with the finding numbered: F3
We disagree wholly or partially with the findings numbered: F1 - F2; F4 - F6
<b>GRAND JURY RECOMMENDATIONS</b> Recommendation numbered R1, R3 will not be implemented because they are not
warranted or reasonable Recommendations numbered R2 has not been implemented and will be implemented in the
future Denn J.
R3
The Board of Supervisors should require the newly created countywide entity to create plans that recognize and address sea level rise exposure and the specific risks to the populations in the Canal District, Marin City, specific areas in Novato, and all low-lying geographic regions where lower income populations reside. The plan should identify and address the risks impacting those populations, which include: (a) risks of becoming stranded due to inaccessible roads; (b) lack of transportation if...
Response: Will Not Implement
Score: -1
R3 will not be implemented because they are not
warranted or reasonable Recommendations numbered R2 has not been implemented and will be implemented in the
future Denn J.
F4
The 2034 deadline imposed by Sections 30985-30985.8 of the California Public Resources Code for each California county to submit its official sea level rise mitigation plan is “too little too late” for Marin county, and delaying action until then will expose coastal and Bay areas to unnecessary flooding risks, financial and other losses.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
agree with the finding numbered: F3
We disagree wholly or partially with the findings numbered: F1 - F2; F4 - F6
<b>GRAND JURY RECOMMENDATIONS</b> Recommendation numbered R1, R3 will not be implemented because they are not
warranted or reasonable Recommendations numbered R2 has not been implemented and will be implemented in the
future Denn J.
F5
Under-represented populations reside in areas that are severely vulnerable to sea level rise because they are in low-lying ground.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Partially Disagree While we agree that some under-represented, lower income areas are subject to disproportionate risk from sea level rise, communities across all socio-economic strata are subject to risk in Marin. Some underrepresented communities are not at immediate risk from sea level rise flooding, but may be disadvantaged in their ability to recover from disaster. Conversely, some wealthier communities are immediately vulnerable as they are located on low-lying areas of the shoreline. We feel that the most equitable sea level rise strategy involves providing communities with what they ne...
F6
Sea level rise plans to be developed by a countywide entity should include adaptation strategies that directly apply to under-represented communities in low-lying areas with great exposure to sea level rise, such as the Canal District, areas of Novato, and Marin City, among others.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
agree with the finding numbered: F3
We disagree wholly or partially with the findings numbered: F1 - F2; F4 - F6
<b>GRAND JURY RECOMMENDATIONS</b> Recommendation numbered R1, R3 will not be implemented because they are not
warranted or reasonable Recommendations numbered R2 has not been implemented and will be implemented in the
future Denn J.
▶
Marin County Board of Supervisors[PDF]
July 30, 2024
•
7 pages
• 8 responses
•
Score: 0
(+0, 7, 0)
View Details ▾
8 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
A comprehensive countywide agency is necessary to effectively address the impacts of sea level rise in Marin County.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
, staff will evaluate the effectiveness of a single point of oversight in the Department of Finance, after which we will be better positioned to conclusively agree or disagree with this finding. F3. The Department of Finance does not currently have adequate resources to administer all aspects of the CAL-Card Program. Response: Partially disagree We cannot agree or disagree with this finding absent an organizational assessment which would ascertain whether adequate resources are needed or could be shifted. County of Marin Response to Grand Jury Findings and Recommendations Page 2 of 6
(May 23,...
R1
The Board of Supervisors, in collaboration with Marin county cities, towns, Bel Marin Keys Community Services District and Marin Water should create a comprehensive countywide agency with authority to plan and implement adaptation efforts addressing the impacts of sea level rise in Marin County.
Response: Requires Analysis
Score: 0
Partially disagree CAL-Cards are a method of payment used to purchase low-dollar-value expenditures that otherwise do not warrant issuing purchase orders or contracts. By County policy, these purchases are less than $5,000. Purchases over $5,000 are made using a requisition and Purchase Order. We cannot agree that current administration of CAL-Card use leads to oversight and controls that are "inconsistent and variable". The County has both a Procurement Manual (updated in 2023) and a CAL-Card Policy Manual (updated in 2021 ), which all CAL-Card holders are required to review and understand be...
F2
To be effective, a countywide agency created to address sea level rise in Marin County should include the County of Marin, all cities and towns, and appropriate special districts in Marin County as funding participants.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Partially disagree We cannot agree conclusively with this finding as an organizational change of this magnitude should be analyzed with a cost-benefit and organizational review that considers staffing, administration, and technological capacity, among other factors. Consistent with the response to F1, staff will evaluate the effectiveness of a single point of oversight in the Department of Finance, after which we will be better positioned to conclusively agree or disagree with this finding. F3. The Department of Finance does not currently have adequate resources to administer all aspects of th...
F3
The complete failure to create and implement effective countywide sea level rise adaptation projects in Marin County will result in significant damages and losses to commercial and residential properties as well as infrastructure, both public and private.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
, an organizational assessment should be conducted before assigning oversight of CAL-Card to the Department of Finance. We will evaluate this potential organizational change relative to the organizational capacity of the DOF and a shared/checks and-balances approach. R3. Begin using the automated Human Resources system to document all initial and annual training, and attestation for the use of CAL-Cards. This recommendation requires further analysis. Use of existing Human Resources systems to document or administer training related to CAL Cards will need to be analyzed for feasibility. It is...
R3
The Board of Supervisors should require the newly created countywide entity to create plans that recognize and address sea level rise exposure and the specific risks to the populations in the Canal District, Marin City, specific areas in Novato, and all low-lying geographic regions where lower income populations reside. The plan should identify and address the risks impacting those populations, which include: (a) risks of becoming stranded due to inaccessible roads; (b) lack of transportation if...
Response: Requires Analysis
Score: 0
Partially disagree CAL-Cards are a method of payment used to purchase low-dollar-value expenditures that otherwise do not warrant issuing purchase orders or contracts. By County policy, these purchases are less than $5,000. Purchases over $5,000 are made using a requisition and Purchase Order. We cannot agree that current administration of CAL-Card use leads to oversight and controls that are "inconsistent and variable". The County has both a Procurement Manual (updated in 2023) and a CAL-Card Policy Manual (updated in 2021 ), which all CAL-Card holders are required to review and understand be...
F4
The 2034 deadline imposed by Sections 30985-30985.8 of the California Public Resources Code for each California county to submit its official sea level rise mitigation plan is “too little too late” for Marin county, and delaying action until then will expose coastal and Bay areas to unnecessary flooding risks, financial and other losses.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Partially disagree We cannot agree or disagree with this finding, as we have not reviewed any documentation that led the Grand Jury to this conclusion. We have not identified any violations of CAL-Card policy at this time. F5. The County of Marin's initial and continuing training program for CAL-Card users and their supervisors is inadequate. Response: Partially Disagree We disagree that the initial training for CAL-Card users is inadequate. CAL-Card users receive a CAL-Card Policy Manual that clearly defines the requirements regarding use of the CAL-Card, and staff have access to both the CAL...
F5
Under-represented populations reside in areas that are severely vulnerable to sea level rise because they are in low-lying ground.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Partially Disagree We disagree that the initial training for CAL-Card users is inadequate. CAL-Card users receive a CAL-Card Policy Manual that clearly defines the requirements regarding use of the CAL-Card, and staff have access to both the CAL-Card Policy Manual and the Procurement Manual from multiple sources. Staff are directed to the State Department of General Services Procurement Division for further training, including informational videos. There is no continuing or annual training requirement at this time. However we will review the potential for such with the Departments of Human Res...
F6
Sea level rise plans to be developed by a countywide entity should include adaptation strategies that directly apply to under-represented communities in low-lying areas with great exposure to sea level rise, such as the Canal District, areas of Novato, and Marin City, among others.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Partially disagree We cannot agree or disagree with this finding, as we have not reviewed any documentation that led the Grand Jury to this conclusion. We have not identified any violations of CAL-Card policy at this time. F5. The County of Marin's initial and continuing training program for CAL-Card users and their supervisors is inadequate. Response: Partially Disagree We disagree that the initial training for CAL-Card users is inadequate. CAL-Card users receive a CAL-Card Policy Manual that clearly defines the requirements regarding use of the CAL-Card, and staff have access to both the CAL...
▶
Marin County Board of Supervisors[PDF]
July 30, 2024
•
7 pages
• 9 responses
•
Score: +2
(+4, 3, -2)
View Details ▾
9 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
A comprehensive countywide agency is necessary to effectively address the impacts of sea level rise in Marin County.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
agree with the finding(s) numbered: F1-F4, and F6.
R1
The Board of Supervisors, in collaboration with Marin county cities, towns, Bel Marin Keys Community Services District and Marin Water should create a comprehensive countywide agency with authority to plan and implement adaptation efforts addressing the impacts of sea level rise in Marin County.
Response: Will Implement
Score: +1
R1 and R9 have not yet been implemented, and will be implemented in the future.
F2
To be effective, a countywide agency created to address sea level rise in Marin County should include the County of Marin, all cities and towns, and appropriate special districts in Marin County as funding participants.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Agree The County of Marin has written contracts in place to ensure service delivery. F3. Membership in insurance risk pools provides the benefits of cybersecurity assessments and audits, which highlight cybersecurity deficiencies and make suggestions for improvement. Response: Agree The County of Marin maintains a Cyber insurance policy with AIG and is not part of the Bay Cities JPIA, or any pool, for Cyber insurance. AIG provides support and consulting time regarding any cyber risks. As part of this engagement, an extensive renewal process occurs yearly, in which the County must meet certain ...
R2
The Board of Supervisors should actively enlist the participation and support of state and federal legislators toward the creation and funding of this comprehensive countywide agency.
Response: Requires Analysis
Score: 0
above, County staff engaged potential municipal stakeholders in June 2024 to discuss the recommendations of this report, including potential interest in a JPA. While a few reported some level of interest dependent upon cost, others expressed that they had initiated local cybersecurity upgrades and projects in their jurisdictions and would not be interested in making any changes in the coming fiscal year. Direct service contracts with some interested agencies are more likely achieve many of the same objectives at less cost than forming a JPA, which requires a formal structure, governance, and o...
F3
The complete failure to create and implement effective countywide sea level rise adaptation projects in Marin County will result in significant damages and losses to commercial and residential properties as well as infrastructure, both public and private.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Agree The County of Marin maintains a Cyber insurance policy with AIG and is not part of the Bay Cities JPIA, or any pool, for Cyber insurance. AIG provides support and consulting time regarding any cyber risks. As part of this engagement, an extensive renewal process occurs yearly, in which the County must meet certain standards to maintain coverage. Insurance risk pools for Marin's cities and towns may bring many of the same benefits more cost-effectively than could be achieved individually. F4. Having a completed, adopted and regularly updated cybersecurity plan helps ensure that all staff ...
R3
The Board of Supervisors should require the newly created countywide entity to create plans that recognize and address sea level rise exposure and the specific risks to the populations in the Canal District, Marin City, specific areas in Novato, and all low-lying geographic regions where lower income populations reside. The plan should identify and address the risks impacting those populations, which include: (a) risks of becoming stranded due to inaccessible roads; (b) lack of transportation if...
Response: Will Not Implement
Score: -1
Agree The County of Marin Information Services and Technology (1ST) department relies on multiple vendors to provide critical services to County departments that serve the public. Including a Business Continuity clause in vendor contracts will help ensure these services are available in the event of a cyberattack or other disaster impacting vendor systems. F2. Marin County municipalities should have current, written contracts with third-party providers of Information Technology, Information Systems, and Cybersecurity services, and should not continue to use those providers' services without a ...
F4
The 2034 deadline imposed by Sections 30985-30985.8 of the California Public Resources Code for each California county to submit its official sea level rise mitigation plan is “too little too late” for Marin county, and delaying action until then will expose coastal and Bay areas to unnecessary flooding risks, financial and other losses.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
agree with the finding(s) numbered: F1-F4, and F6.
F5
Under-represented populations reside in areas that are severely vulnerable to sea level rise because they are in low-lying ground.
Response: Disagree
Score: -1
disagree wholly or partially with the finding(s) numbered: F5.
F6
Sea level rise plans to be developed by a countywide entity should include adaptation strategies that directly apply to under-represented communities in low-lying areas with great exposure to sea level rise, such as the Canal District, areas of Novato, and Marin City, among others.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
agree with the finding(s) numbered: F1-F4, and F6.
▶
Marin County Board of Supervisors[PDF]
July 16, 2024
•
9 pages
• 8 responses
•
Score: +5
(+5, 3, 0)
View Details ▾
8 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
A comprehensive countywide agency is necessary to effectively address the impacts of sea level rise in Marin County.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
agree with the findings numbered: F1, F2
We disagree wholly or partially with the findings numbered: F3 - F6
<b>GRAND JURY RECOMMENDATIONS</b> Recommendations numbered R1 - R3 have not yet been implemented, but will be
implemented presuming adoption of AB 1776.
R1
The Board of Supervisors, in collaboration with Marin county cities, towns, Bel Marin Keys Community Services District and Marin Water should create a comprehensive countywide agency with authority to plan and implement adaptation efforts addressing the impacts of sea level rise in Marin County.
Response: Will Implement
Score: +1
R1 - R3 have not yet been implemented, but will be
implemented presuming adoption of AB 1776.
F2
To be effective, a countywide agency created to address sea level rise in Marin County should include the County of Marin, all cities and towns, and appropriate special districts in Marin County as funding participants.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
agree with the findings numbered: F1, F2
We disagree wholly or partially with the findings numbered: F3 - F6
<b>GRAND JURY RECOMMENDATIONS</b> Recommendations numbered R1 - R3 have not yet been implemented, but will be
implemented presuming adoption of AB 1776.
F3
The complete failure to create and implement effective countywide sea level rise adaptation projects in Marin County will result in significant damages and losses to commercial and residential properties as well as infrastructure, both public and private.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
above, the most effective regulations in this area would be federal in nature, with national guidelines on e-bike speed and accurate labeling of e-bike classes.
"With Power Comes Responsibility - Youths Under Age 16 Operating Class 2 E-Bikes: A Safety Risk" (April 26, 2024) F5. The funding to continue the e-bike specific safety and training program (E-bike Smart Marin) provided by the Marin Bicycle Safety Coalition is not sustainable without new sources of funding. Response: Partially Disagree We cannot agree or wholly disagree with this finding, as the Marin Bicycle Safety Coalition is best ...
R3
The Board of Supervisors should require the newly created countywide entity to create plans that recognize and address sea level rise exposure and the specific risks to the populations in the Canal District, Marin City, specific areas in Novato, and all low-lying geographic regions where lower income populations reside. The plan should identify and address the risks impacting those populations, which include: (a) risks of becoming stranded due to inaccessible roads; (b) lack of transportation if...
Response: Will Implement
Score: +1
R3 have not yet been implemented, but will be
implemented presuming adoption of AB 1776.
F4
The 2034 deadline imposed by Sections 30985-30985.8 of the California Public Resources Code for each California county to submit its official sea level rise mitigation plan is “too little too late” for Marin county, and delaying action until then will expose coastal and Bay areas to unnecessary flooding risks, financial and other losses.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Wholly Disagree There has been a significant amount of legislation introduced in recent years targeting e-bike safety and ridership. However, it is important to note that the State, as well as municipalities, must balance more stringent e-bike regulations with the fact that e-bikes play an important role
COURT "With Power Comes Responsibility - Youths Under Age 16 Operating Class 2 E-Bikes: A Safety Risk" (April 26, 2024) in advancing California climate and emission reduction goals. Additionally, it is important to note that Marin County is far ahead of other jurisdictions in addressing e-bik...
F5
Under-represented populations reside in areas that are severely vulnerable to sea level rise because they are in low-lying ground.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Partially Disagree We cannot agree or wholly disagree with this finding, as the Marin Bicycle Safety Coalition is best suited to opine regarding its funding model. F6. Marin County public schools are not currently able to implement additional bicycle safety training programs for students, beyond what has been offered by Safe Routes to Schools for many years. Partially Disagree Response: We cannot agree or wholly disagree with this finding, as Marin County public schools are best suited to opine regarding school districts' capacity or funding opportunities for bicycle safety funding.
CONNETTY ...
F6
Sea level rise plans to be developed by a countywide entity should include adaptation strategies that directly apply to under-represented communities in low-lying areas with great exposure to sea level rise, such as the Canal District, areas of Novato, and Marin City, among others.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
agree with the findings numbered: F1, F2
We disagree wholly or partially with the findings numbered: F3 - F6
<b>GRAND JURY RECOMMENDATIONS</b> Recommendations numbered R1 - R3 have not yet been implemented, but will be
implemented presuming adoption of AB 1776.
▶
Marin County Board of Supervisors[PDF]
June 25, 2024
•
6 pages
• 9 responses
•
Score: +1
(+1, 2, 0)
View Details ▾
9 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
A comprehensive countywide agency is necessary to effectively address the impacts of sea level rise in Marin County.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
above, the Board of Supervisors and the District Attorney have agreed previously that quarterly reports are warranted and feasible in the future. The organizational study referenced in F1 above will provide insight as to when quarterly reporting will be feasible, and we welcome input from the District Attorney on how we can help facilitate the process. We will continue to explore this issue with the District Attorney and will partner on a County of Marin Response to Grand Jury Findings and Recommendations
Grand Jury Reports (April 8, 2024) regular reporting process informed by evaluation of a...
R1
The Board of Supervisors, in collaboration with Marin county cities, towns, Bel Marin Keys Community Services District and Marin Water should create a comprehensive countywide agency with authority to plan and implement adaptation efforts addressing the impacts of sea level rise in Marin County.
Response: Will Implement
Score: +1
r 1, 2023, for this quarterly reporting to begin, the Board of Supervisors' and District Attorney's responses to the report indicate this recommendation "will be implemented in the future".
F2
To be effective, a countywide agency created to address sea level rise in Marin County should include the County of Marin, all cities and towns, and appropriate special districts in Marin County as funding participants.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
partially disagree with the findings numbered: F1, F2.
R2
The Board of Supervisors should actively enlist the participation and support of state and federal legislators toward the creation and funding of this comprehensive countywide agency.
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
R2 has been implemented.
F3
The complete failure to create and implement effective countywide sea level rise adaptation projects in Marin County will result in significant damages and losses to commercial and residential properties as well as infrastructure, both public and private.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
R3
The Board of Supervisors should require the newly created countywide entity to create plans that recognize and address sea level rise exposure and the specific risks to the populations in the Canal District, Marin City, specific areas in Novato, and all low-lying geographic regions where lower income populations reside. The plan should identify and address the risks impacting those populations, which include: (a) risks of becoming stranded due to inaccessible roads; (b) lack of transportation if...
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
F4
The 2034 deadline imposed by Sections 30985-30985.8 of the California Public Resources Code for each California county to submit its official sea level rise mitigation plan is “too little too late” for Marin county, and delaying action until then will expose coastal and Bay areas to unnecessary flooding risks, financial and other losses.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
F5
Under-represented populations reside in areas that are severely vulnerable to sea level rise because they are in low-lying ground.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
F6
Sea level rise plans to be developed by a countywide entity should include adaptation strategies that directly apply to under-represented communities in low-lying areas with great exposure to sea level rise, such as the Canal District, areas of Novato, and Marin City, among others.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
▶
Marin County Board of Supervisors[PDF]
September 12, 2023
•
7 pages
• 9 responses
•
Score: +4
(+6, 1, -2)
View Details ▾
9 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
A comprehensive countywide agency is necessary to effectively address the impacts of sea level rise in Marin County.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
agree with the findings numbered: F1, F4-F6, F9-F10
We disagree wholly or partially with the findings numbered: F2-F3, and F7-F8.
R1
The Board of Supervisors, in collaboration with Marin county cities, towns, Bel Marin Keys Community Services District and Marin Water should create a comprehensive countywide agency with authority to plan and implement adaptation efforts addressing the impacts of sea level rise in Marin County.
Response: Will Not Implement
Scheduled: within 30 days
Score: -1
Agree. F2. Many homeowners lack information and knowledge about ADU development, and Marin's jurisdictions are not always helpful to homeowners seeking information about ADU development. Response: Partially Disagree. While we can only speak on behalf of the County of Marin, we agree that information pertaining to the building of ADUs and other structures can be technical and difficult for those considering ADU construction to understand without adequate support and advice. Marin County Community Development Agency staff make every effort to provide information to property owners and developers...
F2
To be effective, a countywide agency created to address sea level rise in Marin County should include the County of Marin, all cities and towns, and appropriate special districts in Marin County as funding participants.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
agree with the findings numbered: F1, F4-F6, F9-F10
We disagree wholly or partially with the findings numbered: F2-F3, and F7-F8.
R2
The Board of Supervisors should actively enlist the participation and support of state and federal legislators toward the creation and funding of this comprehensive countywide agency.
Response: Will Not Implement
Scheduled: within 30 days
Score: -1
Agree. F2. Many homeowners lack information and knowledge about ADU development, and Marin's jurisdictions are not always helpful to homeowners seeking information about ADU development. Response: Partially Disagree. While we can only speak on behalf of the County of Marin, we agree that information pertaining to the building of ADUs and other structures can be technical and difficult for those considering ADU construction to understand without adequate support and advice. Marin County Community Development Agency staff make every effort to provide information to property owners and developers...
F3
The complete failure to create and implement effective countywide sea level rise adaptation projects in Marin County will result in significant damages and losses to commercial and residential properties as well as infrastructure, both public and private.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
agree with the findings numbered: F1, F4-F6, F9-F10
We disagree wholly or partially with the findings numbered: F2-F3, and F7-F8.
R3
The Board of Supervisors should require the newly created countywide entity to create plans that recognize and address sea level rise exposure and the specific risks to the populations in the Canal District, Marin City, specific areas in Novato, and all low-lying geographic regions where lower income populations reside. The plan should identify and address the risks impacting those populations, which include: (a) risks of becoming stranded due to inaccessible roads; (b) lack of transportation if...
Response: Will Implement
Score: +1
R3 has not yet been implemented and will be implemented in
the future.
F4
The 2034 deadline imposed by Sections 30985-30985.8 of the California Public Resources Code for each California county to submit its official sea level rise mitigation plan is “too little too late” for Marin county, and delaying action until then will expose coastal and Bay areas to unnecessary flooding risks, financial and other losses.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
agree with the findings numbered: F1, F4-F6, F9-F10
We disagree wholly or partially with the findings numbered: F2-F3, and F7-F8.
F5
Under-represented populations reside in areas that are severely vulnerable to sea level rise because they are in low-lying ground.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Agree. F6. Most Marin jurisdictions could provide better resources offering or identifying financing incentives for ADU development. Response: Agree. F7. Impact, connection, and capacity fees vary considerably throughout the County and such fees can be a disincentive to homeowners considering ADU development. Response: Partially Disagree. While fees vary by jurisdiction and by utility district, under state law, ADUs under 750 square feet do not incur impact fees. Impact fees should therefore be uniform for many ADUs across jurisdictions. Connection and capacity fees vary by utility district, a...
F6
Sea level rise plans to be developed by a countywide entity should include adaptation strategies that directly apply to under-represented communities in low-lying areas with great exposure to sea level rise, such as the Canal District, areas of Novato, and Marin City, among others.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
agree with the findings numbered: F1, F4-F6, F9-F10
We disagree wholly or partially with the findings numbered: F2-F3, and F7-F8.
▶
Marin County Board of Supervisors[PDF]
August 22, 2023
•
6 pages
• 7 responses
•
Score: +2
(+4, 1, -2)
View Details ▾
7 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
A comprehensive countywide agency is necessary to effectively address the impacts of sea level rise in Marin County.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
agree with the finding numbered: F1-F2
We disagree wholly or partially with the findings numbered: F3-F4
GRAND JURY RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendation numbered R3 has been implemented.
R1
The Board of Supervisors, in collaboration with Marin county cities, towns, Bel Marin Keys Community Services District and Marin Water should create a comprehensive countywide agency with authority to plan and implement adaptation efforts addressing the impacts of sea level rise in Marin County.
Response: Will Not Implement
Scheduled: FY 2022-2023
Score: -1
Agree. Service interruptions have increased on average from 2016-2022 and we are concerned particularly with impacts to the most vulnerable in our community during sustained events. The Board of Supervisors is on record supporting efforts to ensure energy providers are held accountable by regulators for costs associated with preparing for and recovering from deenergization events, including "fast-trip" (EPSS) shutoffs. Such events must be regulated to ensure a balance of utility risk mitigation with adequate notice to local governments, emergency managers and residents for protection of vulner...
F2
To be effective, a countywide agency created to address sea level rise in Marin County should include the County of Marin, all cities and towns, and appropriate special districts in Marin County as funding participants.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
agree with the finding numbered: F1-F2
We disagree wholly or partially with the findings numbered: F3-F4
GRAND JURY RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendation numbered R3 has been implemented.
R2
The Board of Supervisors should actively enlist the participation and support of state and federal legislators toward the creation and funding of this comprehensive countywide agency.
Response: Will Not Implement
Scheduled: FY 2022-2023
Score: -1
Agree. Service interruptions have increased on average from 2016-2022 and we are concerned particularly with impacts to the most vulnerable in our community during sustained events. The Board of Supervisors is on record supporting efforts to ensure energy providers are held accountable by regulators for costs associated with preparing for and recovering from deenergization events, including "fast-trip" (EPSS) shutoffs. Such events must be regulated to ensure a balance of utility risk mitigation with adequate notice to local governments, emergency managers and residents for protection of vulner...
F3
The complete failure to create and implement effective countywide sea level rise adaptation projects in Marin County will result in significant damages and losses to commercial and residential properties as well as infrastructure, both public and private.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
agree with the finding numbered: F1-F2
We disagree wholly or partially with the findings numbered: F3-F4
GRAND JURY RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendation numbered R3 has been implemented.
R3
The Board of Supervisors should require the newly created countywide entity to create plans that recognize and address sea level rise exposure and the specific risks to the populations in the Canal District, Marin City, specific areas in Novato, and all low-lying geographic regions where lower income populations reside. The plan should identify and address the risks impacting those populations, which include: (a) risks of becoming stranded due to inaccessible roads; (b) lack of transportation if...
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
R3 has been implemented.
F4
The 2034 deadline imposed by Sections 30985-30985.8 of the California Public Resources Code for each California county to submit its official sea level rise mitigation plan is “too little too late” for Marin county, and delaying action until then will expose coastal and Bay areas to unnecessary flooding risks, financial and other losses.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
agree with the finding numbered: F1-F2
We disagree wholly or partially with the findings numbered: F3-F4
GRAND JURY RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendation numbered R3 has been implemented.
▶
Marin County Board of Supervisors[PDF]
August 22, 2023
•
11 pages
• 6 responses
•
Score: 0
(+0, 6, 0)
View Details ▾
6 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
A comprehensive countywide agency is necessary to effectively address the impacts of sea level rise in Marin County.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Disagree. Although there is always room to improve the coordination of Aging and Adult services for our residents, we believe that Health & Human Services (HHS) is the appropriate organization to integrate these services among HHS and other County departments. HHS works closely with County departments such as the Marin County Free Library, Parks, Public Works, Community Development, the County Administrator, and the Marin Housing Authority, for example, to ensure collaborative services are delivered to older adults. The Information and Assistance line (accessible by calling 415-473-INFO) elimi...
F2
To be effective, a countywide agency created to address sea level rise in Marin County should include the County of Marin, all cities and towns, and appropriate special districts in Marin County as funding participants.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Partially Disagree. There is always room to improve integrated services systems. County services are one component of a network of public, private, and community-based services that are critical for meeting the needs of older adults. To further inform this countywide integration, the County procured a consultant, Githens and Associates, LLC., to develop the Integrated Aging Services Study (January 2023). Since the report was published early this year, HHS has been meeting with stakeholders to engage on prioritization and implementation efforts. Marin currently has a well-supported Aging and Ad...
F3
The complete failure to create and implement effective countywide sea level rise adaptation projects in Marin County will result in significant damages and losses to commercial and residential properties as well as infrastructure, both public and private.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Agree. The Information and Assistance line (415-473-INFO), operated through Aging and Adult Services and funded largely by the County's General Fund, provides this doorway. Staffing has been expanded in 2022-23 to include Vietnamese language services, in addition to the Spanish language services already provided. This multilingual capacity allows Information and Assistance to serve monolingual older adults with culturally and linguistically appropriate services. HHS will continue to explore ways to bolster the Information line. As previously noted, the Board of Supervisors approved funding tha...
F4
The 2034 deadline imposed by Sections 30985-30985.8 of the California Public Resources Code for each California county to submit its official sea level rise mitigation plan is “too little too late” for Marin county, and delaying action until then will expose coastal and Bay areas to unnecessary flooding risks, financial and other losses.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Disagree. The budget presented in the Grand Jury report is incomplete. Other parts of HHS serve the older adult community, including programs in Public Assistance, Public Health, Homelessness/Whole Person Care, and Behavioral Health and Recovery Services (BHRS). Although we know the share of budget dedicated to older adults is more than what was identified in the Grand Jury report, it is difficult to extrapolate the exact budget for older adults in many programs. For example, in BHRS, older adult services are integrated into every BHRS program serving adults. However, several line items for ol...
F5
Under-represented populations reside in areas that are severely vulnerable to sea level rise because they are in low-lying ground.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Agree. We agree that there are not sufficient low- and moderate-income housing options for older adults, despite considerable gains made by County's housing programs: 1) The IHSS program often allows older adults who are MediCal eligible to maintain their existing housing, thereby preventing homelessness. The new <u>Adult Protective Services Home Safe</u> program is designed to prevent housing insecurity for older adults who are at risk of abuse and neglect. From 2017-2022, 30% of persons housed through Whole Person Care and other County services were aged 62 or older. This represents a total ...
F6
Sea level rise plans to be developed by a countywide entity should include adaptation strategies that directly apply to under-represented communities in low-lying areas with great exposure to sea level rise, such as the Canal District, areas of Novato, and Marin City, among others.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Partially Disagree. Partnerships with Marin community-based organizations are essential. The County has increased funding for the Community Services and Nonprofit Partner program by $500,000 over the last three years. Additionally, a significant portion of the HHS budget goes to fund community-based organizations. For example, approximately $75 million of the BHRS division's $100 million budget goes to fund community-based organizations. The County continues to develop new or modified funding approaches to enhance support CBOs. As part of the Fiscal Year 2023-24 budget process, HHS and the CAO...
▶
Marin County Board of Supervisors[PDF]
September 13, 2022
•
7 pages
• 7 responses
•
Score: 0
(+1, 5, -1)
View Details ▾
7 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
A comprehensive countywide agency is necessary to effectively address the impacts of sea level rise in Marin County.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
agree with the findings numbered: F1-F7, and F9-F1 O • We disagree wholly or partially with the finding numbered: F8 GRAND JURY RECOMMENDATIONS • Recommendation numbered R1 will not be implemented because it is not warranted or reasonable in the recommended timeframe.
R1
The Board of Supervisors, in collaboration with Marin county cities, towns, Bel Marin Keys Community Services District and Marin Water should create a comprehensive countywide agency with authority to plan and implement adaptation efforts addressing the impacts of sea level rise in Marin County.
Response: Will Not Implement
Score: -1
Agree. F2. Increasingly, individuals who work in Marin County cannot afford to live in the county, many of whom must commute from outside the county. Response: Agree. F3. Recent California laws provide new incentives for local governments to collaborate in developing affordable housing. Response: Agree. F4. The Regional Housing Needs Allocation allotments are widely viewed as unachievable for the county and many Marin municipalities. Response: Agree. The County supports using the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) as a means of identifying sites for housing, but the current allocation of...
F2
To be effective, a countywide agency created to address sea level rise in Marin County should include the County of Marin, all cities and towns, and appropriate special districts in Marin County as funding participants.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Agree. F3. Recent California laws provide new incentives for local governments to collaborate in developing affordable housing. Response: Agree. F4. The Regional Housing Needs Allocation allotments are widely viewed as unachievable for the county and many Marin municipalities. Response: Agree. The County supports using the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) as a means of identifying sites for housing, but the current allocation of 3,569 units for the 2023-2031 planning period represents an increase of almost 1,900% above the 185 units that were allocated for the most recent planning peri...
F3
The complete failure to create and implement effective countywide sea level rise adaptation projects in Marin County will result in significant damages and losses to commercial and residential properties as well as infrastructure, both public and private.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Agree. F4. The Regional Housing Needs Allocation allotments are widely viewed as unachievable for the county and many Marin municipalities. Response: Agree. The County supports using the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) as a means of identifying sites for housing, but the current allocation of 3,569 units for the 2023-2031 planning period represents an increase of almost 1,900% above the 185 units that were allocated for the most recent planning period (2015-2023). Whether this amount of housing can be built within the eight-year timeframe will depend on many factors that are outside t...
F4
The 2034 deadline imposed by Sections 30985-30985.8 of the California Public Resources Code for each California county to submit its official sea level rise mitigation plan is “too little too late” for Marin county, and delaying action until then will expose coastal and Bay areas to unnecessary flooding risks, financial and other losses.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Agree. The County supports using the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) as a means of identifying sites for housing, but the current allocation of 3,569 units for the 2023-2031 planning period represents an increase of almost 1,900% above the 185 units that were allocated for the most recent planning period (2015-2023). Whether this amount of housing can be built within the eight-year timeframe will depend on many factors that are outside the County's control, such as owner interest, availability of land, financing, and other market forces. F5. Failure to achieve Regional Housing Needs A...
F5
Under-represented populations reside in areas that are severely vulnerable to sea level rise because they are in low-lying ground.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Agree. F6. There is new and increasing support and willingness to cooperate among elected officials for building affordable housing in Marin. Response: Agree. F7. A countywide approach to housing development would enhance Marin's ability to meet affordable and workforce housing needs. Response: Agree. Marin County collaborates and coordinates housing programs with the towns and cities in a number of areas, as discussed further in the response to Recommendation R1 below. County of Marin Response to Grand Jury Findings and Recommendations Page 2 of 6
(June 24, 2022) F8. Large affordable housing...
F6
Sea level rise plans to be developed by a countywide entity should include adaptation strategies that directly apply to under-represented communities in low-lying areas with great exposure to sea level rise, such as the Canal District, areas of Novato, and Marin City, among others.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Agree. F7. A countywide approach to housing development would enhance Marin's ability to meet affordable and workforce housing needs. Response: Agree. Marin County collaborates and coordinates housing programs with the towns and cities in a number of areas, as discussed further in the response to Recommendation R1 below. County of Marin Response to Grand Jury Findings and Recommendations Page 2 of 6
(June 24, 2022) F8. Large affordable housing developments in Marin require subsidies to be financially feasible. Response: Partially disagree. Regardless of size, all affordable housing developmen...
▶
Marin County Board of Supervisors[PDF]
August 23, 2022
•
6 pages
• 8 responses
•
Score: +3
(+3, 5, 0)
View Details ▾
8 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
A comprehensive countywide agency is necessary to effectively address the impacts of sea level rise in Marin County.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
agree with the finding(s) numbered: F1-F4, and FG ■ We disagree wholly or partially with the finding(s) numbered: FS GRAND JURY RECOMMENDATIONS ■ Recommendation(s) numbered R1-R2 have been implemented.
R1
The Board of Supervisors, in collaboration with Marin county cities, towns, Bel Marin Keys Community Services District and Marin Water should create a comprehensive countywide agency with authority to plan and implement adaptation efforts addressing the impacts of sea level rise in Marin County.
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
Agree. Recognizing that a successful response is a shared credit to the community as a whole, we believe our rapid, data-driven, and comprehensive approach inspired trust and significantly mitigated the harm of the pandemic. F2. Marin's broad emergency response showed that the county's health and human services, law enforcement, fire protection, public schools, and other public agencies coordinated and responded to multiple emergencies and inevitable surprises very effectively. Response: Agree. The deep partnership and collaboration across multiple agencies in each element of the response was ...
F2
To be effective, a countywide agency created to address sea level rise in Marin County should include the County of Marin, all cities and towns, and appropriate special districts in Marin County as funding participants.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Agree. The deep partnership and collaboration across multiple agencies in each element of the response was the most critical element of success. F3. The county and community-based organizations overcame initial communications, operational, and logistical challenges, and these collaborations were key to serving the public health needs of Marin's communities. Response: Agree. The lack of experience dealing with such an all-encompassing event led to initial communications. challenges. ,Howeyer, these challenges were quickly identified, confronted, an'd resolved. F4. Marin County's Public Health D...
R2
The Board of Supervisors should actively enlist the participation and support of state and federal legislators toward the creation and funding of this comprehensive countywide agency.
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
Agree. Recognizing that a successful response is a shared credit to the community as a whole, we believe our rapid, data-driven, and comprehensive approach inspired trust and significantly mitigated the harm of the pandemic. F2. Marin's broad emergency response showed that the county's health and human services, law enforcement, fire protection, public schools, and other public agencies coordinated and responded to multiple emergencies and inevitable surprises very effectively. Response: Agree. The deep partnership and collaboration across multiple agencies in each element of the response was ...
F3
The complete failure to create and implement effective countywide sea level rise adaptation projects in Marin County will result in significant damages and losses to commercial and residential properties as well as infrastructure, both public and private.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Agree. The lack of experience dealing with such an all-encompassing event led to initial communications. challenges. ,Howeyer, these challenges were quickly identified, confronted, an'd resolved. F4. Marin County's Public Health Department did an admirable job addressing an avoidable San Quentin COVID-19 outbreak, which resulted in a strain on Marin's health facilities and resources. Response: Agree. Due to many factors, there was a large outbreak at the State Prison in Marin. Although not part of the County of Marin's jurisdiction, upon learning of the problem the County Public Health Officer...
F4
The 2034 deadline imposed by Sections 30985-30985.8 of the California Public Resources Code for each California county to submit its official sea level rise mitigation plan is “too little too late” for Marin county, and delaying action until then will expose coastal and Bay areas to unnecessary flooding risks, financial and other losses.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
agree with the finding(s) numbered: F1-F4, and FG ■ We disagree wholly or partially with the finding(s) numbered: FS GRAND JURY RECOMMENDATIONS ■ Recommendation(s) numbered R1-R2 have been implemented.
F5
Under-represented populations reside in areas that are severely vulnerable to sea level rise because they are in low-lying ground.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Partially disagree. Although we agree that there was not always adequate engagement and coordination with our cities and towns, there were often challenging state and federal mandates that were driving implementation of health and safety protocols that made engagement a real challenge. The County often received notification of changes in state or federal protocols at the same time as the public. We tried to improve communication based on feedback from the cities and towns with weekly updates regarding pandemic developments. To date, Ors. Willis and Santora have directly participated in over 40...
F6
Sea level rise plans to be developed by a countywide entity should include adaptation strategies that directly apply to under-represented communities in low-lying areas with great exposure to sea level rise, such as the Canal District, areas of Novato, and Marin City, among others.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
Agree. This review has already taken place and a decision has been made to reorganize and restructure this agency. County of Marin Response to Grand Jury Findings and Recommendations Page 3 of 5
(May 25, 2022) RESPONSE TO GRAND JURY RECOMMENDATIONS The Marin County Civil Grand Jury recommends the following: R1. By October 31, 2022, the Marin County Board of Supervisors should initiate a comprehensive review of the countywide COVID-19 pandemic response, with the involvement of municipalities, schools, community-based organizations, and businesses. This recommendation has been implemented. The ...
▶
Marin County Board of Supervisors[PDF]
August 16, 2022
•
6 pages
• 7 responses
•
Score: 0
(+0, 7, 0)
View Details ▾
7 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
A comprehensive countywide agency is necessary to effectively address the impacts of sea level rise in Marin County.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
agree with the findings numbered: F1-F3 and F5-F6 ■ We disagree partially with the finding numbered: F4 GRAND JURY RECOMMENDATIONS ■ Recommendations numbered R1 and R2 have not yet been implemented but may be implemented in the future.
F2
To be effective, a countywide agency created to address sea level rise in Marin County should include the County of Marin, all cities and towns, and appropriate special districts in Marin County as funding participants.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Agree. F3. The use of natural gas in buildings gives rise to health and safety risks, including adverse health effects attributed to exposure to natural gas, and safety risks posed by pipeline leaks, ruptures, and explosions. These health and safety risks serve as additional reasons to eliminate natural gas as a fuel source in new and existing buildings. Response: Agree. F4. The timely reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from Marin County's building sector will require in-depth, comprehensive, and coordinated planning. A countywide planning process, coordinated by Marin Climate and Energy Pa...
F3
The complete failure to create and implement effective countywide sea level rise adaptation projects in Marin County will result in significant damages and losses to commercial and residential properties as well as infrastructure, both public and private.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
agree with the findings numbered: F1-F3 and F5-F6 ■ We disagree partially with the finding numbered: F4 GRAND JURY RECOMMENDATIONS ■ Recommendations numbered R1 and R2 have not yet been implemented but may be implemented in the future.
R3
The Board of Supervisors should require the newly created countywide entity to create plans that recognize and address sea level rise exposure and the specific risks to the populations in the Canal District, Marin City, specific areas in Novato, and all low-lying geographic regions where lower income populations reside. The plan should identify and address the risks impacting those populations, which include: (a) risks of becoming stranded due to inaccessible roads; (b) lack of transportation if...
Response: Requires Analysis
Score: 0
Agree. F2. Reducing or eliminating natural gas as a fuel source in buildings will dramatically reduce greenhouse gas emissions from Marin County's building sector. Response: Agree. F3. The use of natural gas in buildings gives rise to health and safety risks, including adverse health effects attributed to exposure to natural gas, and safety risks posed by pipeline leaks, ruptures, and explosions. These health and safety risks serve as additional reasons to eliminate natural gas as a fuel source in new and existing buildings. Response: Agree. F4. The timely reduction of greenhouse gas emissions...
F4
The 2034 deadline imposed by Sections 30985-30985.8 of the California Public Resources Code for each California county to submit its official sea level rise mitigation plan is “too little too late” for Marin county, and delaying action until then will expose coastal and Bay areas to unnecessary flooding risks, financial and other losses.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
agree with the findings numbered: F1-F3 and F5-F6 ■ We disagree partially with the finding numbered: F4 GRAND JURY RECOMMENDATIONS ■ Recommendations numbered R1 and R2 have not yet been implemented but may be implemented in the future.
F5
Under-represented populations reside in areas that are severely vulnerable to sea level rise because they are in low-lying ground.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
agree with the findings numbered: F1-F3 and F5-F6 ■ We disagree partially with the finding numbered: F4 GRAND JURY RECOMMENDATIONS ■ Recommendations numbered R1 and R2 have not yet been implemented but may be implemented in the future.
F6
Sea level rise plans to be developed by a countywide entity should include adaptation strategies that directly apply to under-represented communities in low-lying areas with great exposure to sea level rise, such as the Canal District, areas of Novato, and Marin City, among others.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
agree with the findings numbered: F1-F3 and F5-F6 ■ We disagree partially with the finding numbered: F4 GRAND JURY RECOMMENDATIONS ■ Recommendations numbered R1 and R2 have not yet been implemented but may be implemented in the future.
▶
Marin County Board of Supervisors[PDF]
September 10, 2019
•
11 pages
• 1 response
•
Score: -1
(+0, 0, -1)
View Details ▾
1 response to findings and recommendations
F1
A comprehensive countywide agency is necessary to effectively address the impacts of sea level rise in Marin County.
Response: Disagree
Score: -1
disagree wholly or partially with the findings numbered: F1-F7.