Ventura County Grand Jury • 1995-1996

Ventura County Community College Financial Aid Program

4 pages
Ver PDF original

Findings 29 findings

F1
Financial Aid officers, EOPS Coordinators, Financial Aid Task Force, VCC Board of Trustees and the Chancellor were all aware that problems exist regarding the distribution of financial aid awards to students.
F2
There is no administrative position at the district wide level or at individual colleges with the authority and responsibility for developing and overseeing uniform guidelines for all offices involved in financial aid services.
F3
There is no apparent cooperative effort to find solutions among the offices involved in providing these student services. Each office is attempting to solve these problems without communicating with each other.
F4
Frustration was voiced in all offices involved over the lack of meaningful communication 89 regarding these problems. The EOPS and Financial Aid offices are situated in the same building in close proximity.
F5
Problems related to cooperation and delayed payouts appear to have begun when the student services administrator position was eliminated in 1993.
F6
Distribution of financial aid funds to students is governed by strict federal and state regulations. These include eligibility requirements based on: need, U.S. citizenship or legal non citizen, satisfactory academic progress, enrollment in a program leading to a degree or certificate, and completing the program in the prescribed length of time and with the proper amount of accrued credits.
F7
County Financial Aid Officers (FAO) meet regularly with the statewide Financial Aid Administrators Association to deal with the complex federal and state issues/regulations.
F8
Disagreement exists among the student services offices regarding how strict the interpretation of the state/federal regulations must be.
F9
Students can be denied financial aid disbursements if they fail to provide necessary documents/information, fail to fulfill their obligations to maintain a 2.0 grade point average, fail to complete the required number of courses in the prescribed time frame.
F10
One of the most prevalent reasons for delays in pay outs is the lack of required documents and other necessary information students must provide.
F11
Applications for financial aid that are filed at the last minute do not give students time to collect missing documents/information in time to avoid delays in pay outs.
F12
Formal meetings for all students approved for financial aid packages, designed to underscore requirements for maintaining their eligibility, were discontinued during budget cuts.
F13
If a student loses financial aid eligibility for any reason, an appeals process is in place, however, disbursement checks will probably be delayed while decisions are made. Concerns from EOPS Coordinators regarding student disbursement delays included:
F14
Students are placed on "Suspension" status instead of "Probation" which results in loss of financial aid until the following semester or until an appeal is filed and approved.
F15
Delays in receiving financial aid checks have resulted in some students having to drop out of school.
F16
There is a lack of clear, advance notice from the Financial Aid Office to students regarding their status and the probable consequences if they are not meeting eligibility standards.
F17
The language of the "Satisfactory Academic Progress Standards" information sheet developed to assist financial aid students is too technical, not "user friendly", was written without involvement of offices/personnel affected by provisions. Concerns of students included:
F18
Major difficulties if financial aid checks are delayed.
F19
Small temporary loans of $100 from EOPS were not enough to pay for books so students 90 could start classes.
F20
In some cases students felt they had not been treated with respect by employees who worked at the counters in Financial Aid offices.
F21
One student could not get all the information needed. The student stated that the various offices blamed each other and no one came up with all the information needed to straighten out the problem.
F22
Students who met all requirements did not have problems with disbursements.
F23
Once a problem arose, it was difficult to get back on track even with constant efforts to determine what course of action the student needed to take. Concerns from Financial Aid officers regarding student disbursement delays included:
F24
Other student services offices do not understand how rigid financial aid regulations have become. Since 1992 the 600 pages of government regulations have risen to 1300 pages.
F25
Financial Aid Offices are responsible to federal and state agencies for the proper distribution of funds and are subject to audit and possible pay back of funds if found in non-compliance.
F26
The number of students applying for financial aid more than doubled since 1992, even as district wide enrollment fell.
F27
The work in Financial Aid Offices is cyclical. The greatest need for more staff is from July to November when applications are being processed and pay outs are being made.
F28
Some offices do not encourage student accountability in the matter of maintaining financial aid assistance.
F29
A new software program called "Power Faids" is now in place which will expedite delivery of financial aid to eligible students.

Recommendations 11