Orange County Grand Jury
• 2001-2002
• Agency Response
Election Time & Telephone System
⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Note: Missing finding numbers detected: F2
Findings and Recommendations 6 findings
F1
ROV telephone system and staff is inadequate to meet demand at peak election times. 4 2. A provision of the ROV ACD system designed to record calls was not used in the last presidential election.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
Without adequate data, an accurate analysis of the systems shortcomings was not feasible.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
The IVR system currently in use at ROV does not accommodate Spanish and Vietnamese languages.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
County agencies are free to go to outside vendors to address specific needs to their internal telephone system.
No recommendations for this finding
F6
CEO/OIT has the responsibility to maintain the county’s telephone and computer system.
No recommendations for this finding
F7
There is no requirement for ROV or any other agency to consult with CEO/OIT or seek their expertise. A response to Findings 1 through 4 is required from the Board of Supervisors and requested from the Orange County Registrar of Voters. A response to Finding 5 through 7 is required from the Board of Supervisors and requested from the County Executive Officer/Office of Information Technology.
No recommendations for this finding