📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
Lake County Grand Jury
• 2023-2024
Pacific Gas and Electric Undergrounding in Lake County
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 5 findings
F1
Page 50
PG&E did not follow the guidelines set forth in the CATTCH handbook to which PG&E is
F2
Page 50
PG&E did not notify emergency services when it closed off access to the Golf Road area in
F3
Page 50
PG&E did not notify the Golf Road area residents that the access to individual roads would
F4
Page 51
There was insufficient oversight by Lake County DPW, due to simultaneous projects by
F5
Page 51
The distance between several PG&E crews working simultaneously stretches DPW
Recommendations 4
-
R1Page 51That DPW explore funding additional inspectors, at the expense of PG&E. F4, F5 R2. That DPW contract with a licensed engineering firm to perform inspections of PG&E, and their subcontractors, during heavy inspection times. F4, F5 R3. That DPW enforce the CATTCH guidelines, per their encroachment permits. F1 R4. That DPW ensure that PG&E make all required emergency service and residential notifications in a timely manner. F2, F3 RESPONSE As per the California Penal Code, Section 933.05(a), (b), (c), the following
-
R2Page 51That DPW contract with a licensed engineering firm to perform inspections of PG&E, and
-
R3Page 51That DPW enforce the CATTCH guidelines, per their encroachment permits. F1
-
R4Page 51That DPW ensure that PG&E make all required emergency service and residential