Riverside County Grand Jury • 2008-2009

Emergency Treatment Services Ets provides psychiatric assessment and crisis intervention to adults, children

Published: June 17, 2009 3 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 7 findings

F1
For the months of March and April 2009, ETS interviewed more than 1,700 patients. The only existing triage area, with its two interview rooms, is inadequate to handle the volume of patient interviews. This situation appears to be inconsistent with Welfare and Institutions Code Section 5325.1 (b), relating to patient confidentiality. RCRMC executive administration has shared with the 2008-2009 Grand Jury the proposed plans for expansion of the AC. As of the date of this report construction has not commenced. (The patient confidentiality issue was also a finding of the 2006-2007 Riverside County Grand Jury.)
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Expedite plans to expand the capacity of ETS at the AC. Consider utilization of portable office units as an immediate solution to the space problem.
F2
During a February 2009 visit to ITF, it was observed that one of the monitors surveilling a patient room in Unit A, (Intensive Treatment) was not functioning. It was also noted that the images provided by the monitors surveilling other patient rooms were grainy. In October 2008 there were monitors on order with county Facilities Management to replace Unit A monitors, as well as those in ETS and the restraint room in Unit D. In February 2009 the requisition was modified to include additional monitors to cover blind spots in Units B and C. As of this report none has been received.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Give top priority to the urgent need for receipt and installation of the video monitors that are on order.
F3
Psychiatric patients are released with a 14-day supply of medication. Because of the minimal number of outpatient clinics available, upon release there can be a lengthy time interval before their scheduled follow- up medical appointments. This lag creates a recurring situation where the patients exhaust their supply of medication before they are seen. Staff refers to this situation as a “revolving door syndrome,” in which patients will return to emergency services for additional medication multiple times in the interim. Of the more than 1,700 ETS patients seen in March and April, 142 of them had returned only for medication. Because they are not acute patients, some wait up to 12 hours before they are evaluated by staff.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
Open an Urgent Care Clinic in the ETS lobby for patients who need to be seen and are not in crisis, thus addressing the “revolving door syndrome”.
F4
There is a need for RCRMC and the Department of Mental Health to provide outpatient clinics for patients suffering from chronic mental illness.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
Create an outpatient clinic at the AC to service patients suffering from chronic mental illness.
F5
Other than at the AC, uninsured psychiatric clients countywide do not get served unless they are in crisis. When these patients frequent the hospital emergency rooms on a recurring basis, they may become eligible for coverage from Proposition 63 monies. (These state funds are provided to counties to expand mental health services.) 2
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
Design a program that will qualify uninsured patients for funding based on Proposition 63 / Mental Health Services Act requirements.
F6
There is a lack of services in the Coachella Valley for uninsured mentally ill individuals not in crisis.
Related Recommendations (1)
R6
Provide at lease one adequate inpatient psychiatric treatment facility in the Coachella Valley for the uninsured population.
F7
Interviews revealed that almost daily, patients in the inpatient facility are ready to be released to the next level of care with no immediate place to go. Meanwhile, there are patients in emergency services that have already been evaluated for placement in the inpatient facility with no available inpatient beds.
Related Recommendations (1)
R7
Take immediate action to expand the ITF capacity. Report Issued: 06/10/09 Report Public: 06/12/09 Response Due: 09/08/09 3

No Responses Found 2

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

County of Riverside Agency
Riverside County County