📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Lake County Grand Jury • 2016-2017

200 + County Properties Need Management

View PDF View Full Original

Findings and Recommendations 12 findings

F1 Page 33
After multiple interviews with various county officials and staff
No recommendations for this finding
F2 Page 33
The Grand Jury’s conclusion is that in some cases the County is under
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Page 34
Perform an audit of properties every two years. (F3, F5, F6, F9, F12)
F3 Page 33
Keeping track of County owned properties is not a high priority. The
No recommendations for this finding
F4 Page 33
Employees involved in County owned properties are not familiar with
No recommendations for this finding
F5 Page 33
Insurance coverage for County owned properties is not consistent.
No recommendations for this finding
F6 Page 33
Insured values placed on listed properties are not consistent.
No recommendations for this finding
F7 Page 33
Docks, piers and gazebos are treated differently by the insurance agency
No recommendations for this finding
F8 Page 33
County employees are unable to explain the discrepancies in insurance
No recommendations for this finding
F9 Page 33
County reviews of the insurance coverage on County owned properties
No recommendations for this finding
F10 Page 34
The Grand Jury was informed that replacement value coverage is
No recommendations for this finding
F11 Page 34
It is possible insurance premiums would change if items on the schedule
No recommendations for this finding
F12 Page 34
The “Master” schedule of insured properties prepared by Alliant shows
No recommendations for this finding

Additional Recommendations 5

These recommendations are not explicitly linked to specific findings.