Lake County Grand Jury

2016-2017

15 reports

Additional Recommendations 1

Not linked to specific findings.

R1: Provide training in the process to enforcement officials within two months after adoption. (F2, F6) R 3. BOS determine who had the responsibility to initiate the collection activity and discipline that person or entity. (F4) R 4. County Counsel determine, within two months, where in the ordinances the requirement for insurance needs to be added. (F5) R 5. BOS change the Chapter 13 ordinance to require the use of two methods of delivery of the Notice to Abate for lake-related abatements to ensure it is included in
Page 20
Findings & Recommendations 12 findings
F1: After multiple interviews with various county officials and staff
Page 33
F2: The Grand Jury’s conclusion is that in some cases the County is under
Page 33
Related Recommendations (1)
R2: Perform an audit of properties every two years. (F3, F5, F6, F9, F12)
F3: Keeping track of County owned properties is not a high priority. The
Page 33
F4: Employees involved in County owned properties are not familiar with
Page 33
F5: Insurance coverage for County owned properties is not consistent.
Page 33
F6: Insured values placed on listed properties are not consistent.
Page 33
F7: Docks, piers and gazebos are treated differently by the insurance agency
Page 33
F8: County employees are unable to explain the discrepancies in insurance
Page 33
F9: County reviews of the insurance coverage on County owned properties
Page 33
F10: The Grand Jury was informed that replacement value coverage is
Page 34
F11: It is possible insurance premiums would change if items on the schedule
Page 34
F12: The “Master” schedule of insured properties prepared by Alliant shows
Page 34
Additional Recommendations 5

Not linked to specific findings.

R1: By September 2017, establish a centralized Property Management
Page 34
R3: Correct Property Schedule inconsistencies. Complete by January 2018.
Page 34
R4: Perform an investigation into why the Holiday Harbor RV Park and
Page 34
R5: Add the Clarks Island Pedestrian Bridge to the Lake County Property
Page 34
R6: Add the large County and Park signs as well as the clocks to the Lake
Page 34

Findings and recommendations not yet extracted.

Findings & Recommendations 1 findings
F1: The staffing of the Hill Road Facility Control/Monitoring room is
Page 106
Findings & Recommendations 5 findings
F1: Cooperation between Lake and Yolo counties is essential to deal with the
Page 98
F2: The public has many misconceptions about the release of water from Clear
Page 98
F3: Property owners have often been remiss in keeping debris out of the lake,
Page 98
F4: The Rumsey scale has caused some problems for property owners because
Page 98
F5: The environment and economic impact of dredging the Riffle have not
Page 98
Findings & Recommendations 12 findings
F1: The County Budget for operation of BH is approximately $65,000, the
Page 59
Related Recommendations (1)
R1: Use two teams of two people each to prepare medication dosages. (F2, F4)
F2: The requirement of medication dosage preparation has impeded the most
Page 59
Related Recommendations (1)
R2: Broaden and improve nursing recruitment methods. (F3, F5)
F3: Efforts to hire and retain skilled nurses for the BH have been unsuccessful.
Page 59
F4: Filling open personnel requisitions would allow many more services to be
Page 59
F5: Searches for nursing staff are generally made using common methods along
Page 60
F6: The latest organizational/management changes at the Department of BH are
Page 60
F7: An Umbrella Agency, consisting of Department of Social Services,
Page 60
F8: An “Interim Director of Behavioral Health” was installed in December 2016
Page 60
F9: The proposal to the BOS for consideration of an Umbrella Agency was made
Page 60
F10: No other gathering of supportive information was given to the BOS,
Page 60
F11: Current plans to create such an umbrella agency are tabled due to financial
Page 60
F12: It was stated that there are to be “open hearings” on formation of such an
Page 60
Additional Recommendations 4

Not linked to specific findings.

R3: Perform a formal full BOS review of goals, accomplishments, progress
Page 61
R4: Undertake a comprehensive study of the pros and cons of creating an
Page 61
R5: Hold a series of open hearings within the next year before making any
Page 61
R6: Any decision to consolidate various agencies under an umbrella agency be
Page 61

Findings and recommendations not yet extracted.

Findings and recommendations not yet extracted.

Findings and recommendations not yet extracted.

Findings & Recommendations 1 findings
F1: All facilities are doing their jobs well; the Grand Jury commends the staff
Page 104
Findings & Recommendations 1 findings
F1: The SSD Guardianship Program is operating efficiently with funding from
Page 66
Findings & Recommendations 13 findings
F1: Employees involved in these County owned properties are not familiar
Page 24
F2: It is not entirely clear what insurance is in place for Holiday Harbor.
Page 24
F3: The County has $7.2 million invested in two commercial properties
Page 24
F4: Original plans for the Holiday Harbor property were too aggressive and
Page 24
F5: The Sheriff and County officials are allowing two boats with registrations
Page 24
F6: Holiday Harbor berthing fees have not been paid for several years. The
Page 25
F7: If the College leaves after five years in July 2018, plans for the property
Page 25
F8: The small enrollment in the College does not appear to justify the cost of
Page 25
F9: Some County officials seem to be unaware of the amount of money
Page 25
F10: Considerable additional funds will be required to fully utilize the Castle
Page 25
F11: Parking at The Castle is inadequate for the County’s current and intended
Page 25
F12: The County should not be in the business of purchasing and developing
Page 25
F13: The County and the communities where these properties are located have
Page 25
Findings & Recommendations 4 findings
F1: City of Clearlake: Pavement Management Program Update Report 2015
Page 46
F2: City produced pamphlet: City Streets: Facts and Information
Page 46
F3: Portions of the City Of Clearlake Budget for 2016-2017
Page 46
F4: City produced document titled “Road Maintenance and Improvement 2016-2017 Lake County Grand Jury 49 2016-2017 Lake County Grand Jury
Page 46
Findings & Recommendations 4 findings
F1: http://www.co.lake.ca.us/Government/Directory/Animal_Care_And_Control. htm (Lake County Animal Care and Control)
Page 114
F2: http://www.clearlake.ca.us/211/Animal-Control (City of Clearlake Animal Control)
Page 114
F3: Gruenk, Jennifer, “Pet pantry open to the public.” Lake County Record Bee, February 4, 2017
Page 114
F4: Facebook.com/AnimalAssistandRescue/ 2016-2017 Lake County Grand Jury
Page 114
Findings & Recommendations 4 findings
F1: Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association www.hjta.org
Page 69
F2: Legislative Analyst’s Office Understanding Proposition 218 (Right to Vote on Taxes Act, 1996) www.lao.ca.gov
Page 69
F3: www.waterboards.ca.gov
Page 70
F4: www.co.lake.ca.us 2016-2017 Lake County Grand Jury 72 Appendix 1 Charges for Single Family Residence 2016-2017 Lake County Grand Jury 73 2016-2017 Lake County Grand Jury 74 Single Family Residence City/Agency Water Service Provider Monthly Monthly Total Billing Total Service Usage and Month Frequency Monthly Charge Additional Charge Charge Charges Based on Anderson Anderson Springs Com. $ 36.00 $ 36.00 Monthly N/A Springs Service District Bonanza Springs Bonanza Springs Water $ 19.10 $ 15.45 $ 34.55 Bi-Monthly 750cf Buckingham Buckingham Park County $ 52.26 $ 27.03 $ 79.29 Monthly 750cf Water District Clearlake California Cities $ 49.80 $ 35.40 $ 85.20 Monthly 750cf Water(Golden State Water) Clearlake Konocti County Water $ 30.00 $ 0.23 $ 30.23 Bi-Monthly 750cf District Clearlake Highlands Water $ 33.00 $ 33.00 Monthly 750cf Clearlake Golden State Water $ 76.25 $ 35.40 $111.65 Monthly/Bi- 750cf Monthly Clearlake Oaks Clearlake Oaks Water District $ 29.31 $ 21.46 $ 50.77 Monthly 750cf Clearlake Riviera Mount Konocti Water $100.00 $ 100.00 Monthly 750cf Cobb Area Mount Hannah Water $ 30.45 $ 33.33 $ 63.78 Bi-Monthly 750cf Cobb Area Cobb Area Water District $ 68.50 $ 68.50 Bi-Monthly 750cf Cobb Area Starview Water $ 20.00 $ 20.00 Bi-Monthly 750cf Finley Finley Water $ 13.09 $ 21.09 $ 34.18 Bi-Monthly 750cf Hidden Valley Hidden Valley Lakes Com. $ 30.57 $ 15.53 $ 46.10 Monthly 750cf Service District Kelseyville Kelseyville Water $ 28.89 $ 21.74 $ 50.63 Bi-Monthly 750cf Kono Tayee Kono Tayee $ 27.64 $ 10.47 $ 38.01 Bi-Monthly 750cf Lakeport City of Lakeport $ 34.85 $ 22.08 $ 56.93 Monthly 750cf Loch Lomond Cobb Area Water District $ 45.00 $ 14.40 $ 59.40 Monthly 750cf Lower Lake Lower Lake County Water $ 59.64 $ 5.25 $ 64.89 Monthly 750cf Lucerne California Water Service $ 47.31 $ 80.49 $127.80 Bi-Monthly 750cf Middletown Callayomi County Water $ 44.50 $ 44.50 Monthly 750cf District Nice Nice Mutual Water $ 40.00 $ 51.13 $ 91.13 Monthly 750cf North Lakeport North Lakeport Water $ 22.66 $ 8.55 $ 31.21 Bi-Monthly 750cf Paradise Paradise Water $ 54.38 $ 74.16 $ 128.54 Bi-Monthly 750cf Riviera West Riviera West Mutual $ 81.72 $ 0.36 $ 82.08 Bi-Monthly 750cf Soda Bay Area Soda Bay Water $ 28.90 $ 28.50 $ 57.40 Bi-Monthly 750cf Spring Valley Spring Valley Water $ 25.00 $ 11.33 $ 36.33 Bi-Monthly 750cf 2016-2017 Lake County Grand Jury 75 2016-2017 Lake County Grand Jury 76 Appendix 2 Consolidation of Cobb Water Districts 2016-2017 Lake County Grand Jury 77 2016-2017 Lake County Grand Jury 78 Appendix 3 History of Calpine Pipeline 2016-2017 Lake County Grand Jury 79 2016-2017 Lake County Grand Jury 80 2016-2017 Lake County Grand Jury 81 2016-2017 Lake County Grand Jury 82 2016-2017 Lake County Grand Jury 83 2016-2017 Lake County Grand Jury
Page 70