📋
Extraído del Informe Consolidado
Esta investigación fue publicada originalmente como parte de un informe consolidado más amplio que contiene múltiples investigaciones. Consulte el PDF consolidado para ver el documento completo.
⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 4 findings
F1
Page 69
Based on the review of documents the policies and procedures currently in place in the CED adequately manage and monitor each public nuisance complaint from inception to resolution.
F2
Page 69
The nature of public nuisance abatement is ongoing and fluid. As existing complaints are resolved new complaints are being logged and tracked.
F3
Page 63
The Community Development and Services Agency continues to improve both customer relations and complaint resolution in the Building Department.
F4
Page 69
Code Enforcement is “response driven” as per the policy of the Board of Supervisors; there is no proactive approach to public nuisance abatement in Yuba County.
Recommendations 4
-
R1Page 75Consider placing the portable classrooms in a safer location. PASSED and ADOPTED by the Yuba County Grand Jury on June 12, 2009
-
R2Page 72The OPUD should develop and maintain written procedures for handling, storage and distribution of confidential information. The OPUD must ensure all employees are trained in these procedures and understand the applicability of these procedures to their respective job duties and responsibilities.
-
R3Page 63The Community Development and Services Agency should take the lessons learned with the streamlined complaint process in the Building Department and extend them throughout the Agency. PASSED and ADOPTED by the Yuba County Grand Jury on June 2, 2009
-
R4Page 69“Response driven” public nuisance abatement may not be the best model for a sparsely populated, largely rural county such as Yuba. It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors revisit this policy for improving the purpose and mission effectiveness of the Code Enforcement Department. PASSED and ADOPTED by the Yuba County Grand Jury on June 2, 2009 Yuba County Grand Jury Final Report June 25, 2009