⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 1 findings
F01
After comparing County Procurement’s performance metrics against other similar municipal procurement staffs, County procurement staff is at or near capacity, operating as efficiently as practical. Additional resources in terms of staffing may be required to maintain the service levels the County of San Diego has come to expect from their procurement staff.
Recommendations 1
-
08-63Page 1Put in place management controls to ensure that staff workload is distributed to
Commendations 1
-
CM1The management and staff of the County of San Diego Department of Purchasing and Contracting are to be commended for their diligence in delivering a quality of service with limited resources in a difficult process. Procurement operates in a world of regulation and requirements that is forever changing and does so with proper customer service. The Grand Jury believes the work performed by the procurement staff is performed at levels of competence rivaling the best practices of any procurement operation within the municipal community. REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS The California Penal Code §933(c) requires any public agency which the Grand Jury has reviewed, and about which it has issued a final report, to comment to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court on the findings and recommendations pertaining to matters under the control of the agency. Such comment shall be made no later than 90 days after the Grand Jury publishes its report (filed with the Clerk of the Court); except that in the case _____________________________________________________________________3 SAN DIEGO COUNTY GRAND JURY 2007—2008 (filed May 20, 2008) of a report containing findings and recommendations pertaining to a department or agency headed by an elected County official (e.g. District Attorney, Sheriff, etc.), such comment shall be made within 60 days to the Presiding Judge with an information copy sent to the Board of Supervisors. Furthermore, California Penal Code §933.05(a), (b), (c), details, as follows, the manner in which such comment(s) are to be made: (a) As to each grand jury finding, the responding person or entity shall indicate one of the following: (1) The respondent agrees with the finding (2) The respondent disagrees wholly or partially with the findings, in which case the response shall specify the portion of the finding that is disputed and shall include an explanation of the reasons therefor. (b) As to each grand jury recommendation, the responding person or entity shall report one of the following actions: (1) The recommendation has been implemented, with a summary regarding the implemented action. (2) The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future, with a time frame for implementation. (3) The recommendation requires further analysis, with an explanation and the scope and parameters of an analysis or study, and a time frame for the matter to be prepared for discussion by the officer or head of the agency or department being investigated or reviewed, including the governing body of the public agency when applicable. This time frame shall not exceed six months from the date of publication of the grand jury report. (4) The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or is not reasonable, with an explanation therefor. (c) If a finding or recommendation of the grand jury addresses budgetary or personnel matters of a county agency or department headed by an elected officer, both the agency or department head and the Board of Supervisors shall respond if requested by the grand jury, but the response of the Board of Supervisors shall address only those budgetary or personnel matters over which it has some decision making authority. The response of the elected agency or department head shall address all aspects of the findings or recommendations affecting his or her agency or department. Comments to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court in compliance with the Penal Code §933.05 are required from the: _____________________________________________________________________4 SAN DIEGO COUNTY GRAND JURY 2007—2008 (filed May 20, 2008) Responding Agency Recommendations Date County of San Diego Department of 08-63 8/18/08 Purchasing and Contracting _____________________________________________________________________5 SAN DIEGO COUNTY GRAND JURY 2007—2008 (filed May 20, 2008)