Recipe for Failure: Shrinking Budgets and Increasing Needs for Emergency Homeless Shelters

Local jurisdictions have not provided adequate emergency shelter to accommodate ​ the vast majority (80%) of the more than 3,500 total homeless persons in Santa Cruz County (using 2013 PIT data). Response from the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors: AGREE ­ The County and the four cities work together under the auspices of the ​ Homeless Action Partnership (HAP). The HAP’s strategy is to prioritize permanently ending homelessness for people experiencing it through national best practice strategies such as permanent supportive housing and homelessness prevention and rapid rehousing programs. While we believe this is the right approach to end homelessness for individuals experiencing it, we recognize the ongoing need for emergency shelter, and we have worked to fund and ensure availability of emergency winter shelter each year in both North and South County. These programs together provide about 175 emergency shelter beds. Response from the Capitola City Council: AGREE ­ Capitola along with the County and the other cities work together under ​ the auspices of the Homeless Action Partnership (HAP). The HAP’s strategy is to prioritize permanently ending homelessness for people experiencing it through national best practice strategies such as permanent supportive housing and homelessness prevention and rapid re­housing programs. While we believe this is the right approach to end homelessness for individuals experiencing it, we recognize the on­going need for emergency shelter and we have worked to fund and ensure availability of emergency winter shelter each year in both north and South County. Response from the Santa Cruz City Council: AGREE ­ The County and the four cities, including the City of Santa Cruz, work ​ together under the auspices of the Homeless Action Partnership (HAP). The HAP's strategy is to prioritize permanently ending homelessness for people experiencing it through national best practice strategies such as permanent supportive housing and homelessness prevention and rapid rehousing programs. While we believe this is the right approach to end homelessness for individuals experiencing it, we recognize the on­going need for emergency shelter and we have worked to fund and ensure availability of emergency winter shelter each year plus two year round shelters on the Homeless Services Center campus. This includes the 48 bed Paul Lee Loft and the 32 bed River Street Shelter. Response from the Scotts Valley City Council: AGREE ­ The County and the four cities work together under the auspices of the ​ Homeless Action Partnership (HAP). The HAP’s strategy is to prioritize permanently ending homelessness for people experiencing it through national best practice strategies such as permanent supportive housing and homelessness prevention and rapid rehousing programs. While we believe this is the right approach to end homelessness for individuals experiencing it, we recognize the 13 on­ going need for emergency shelter, and we have worked to fund and ensure availability of emergency winter shelter each year in both North and South County. Response from the Chief Executive Officer, Encompass: AGREE Response from the Executive Director, Homeless Services Center: AGREE

Despite persistent unmet need, local jurisdictions have neither increased nor planned to increase the number of emergency shelter beds and services. Response from the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors: PARTIALLY DISAGREE ­ Over the last several years there has been an ​ increased number of emergency shelter beds and services in North County. Those projects include the Paul Lee Loft (48 beds) initiated in 2008, and the Recuperative Care Center (X beds) initiated in January 2014 serving medically vulnerable people who are homeless and being discharged from hospitals. In addition, while not the subject of this report, additional shelter beds in the Watsonville area have been or are being opened through the Pajaro Rescue Missions seen Challenge (X beds) and the Paget Center (X beds) serving homeless veterans, which opened in 2013. Although as a region we are prioritizing permanent supportive housing, rapid rehousing and prevention, considering additional emergency and interim services is a key action strategy under All­In, the recently adopted county­wide strategic ​ ​ plan, which states: “Engage the community around developing additional emergency and interim services for unmet health and safety needs of persons living outdoors, including small shelters around the county, warming centers and improvements to existing shelters.” (All­In ) ​ ​ As long as people are sleeping outside more needs to be done to identify the resources needed to end homelessness and to shelter individuals who are experiencing it. The FY 2015/16 budget adopted by the Board of Supervisors includes a new Homeless/Housing Coordination staff person. This staff position will help coordinate the implementation of All­In and it will work with the Inter­agency ​ ​ ​ Staff Coordinating Group. Response from the Capitola City Council: PARTIALLY DISAGREE ­ Over the last several years number of emergency ​ shelter beds and services in North County has increased. Those projects include the Paul Lee Loft in 2008, and the Recuperative Care Center serving medically vulnerable people who are homeless and being discharged from hospitals in January of 2014. In addition, while not the subject of this report, additional shelter beds in Watsonville have been or are being opened through the Pajaro Rescue Mission/Teen Challenge and the Paget Center serving homeless veterans, which opened in 2013. Although as a region we are prioritizing permanent supportive housing, rapid rehousing and prevention, considering additional emergency and interim services 14 is a key action strategy under All­In, the recently adopted county­wide strategic ​ ​ plan, which states: “Engage the community around developing additional emergency and interim services for unmet health and safety needs of persons living outdoors, including small shelters around the county, warming centers and improvements to existing shelters.” (All­In ) ​ ​ Obviously, as long as people are sleeping outside more needs to be done to identify the resources needed to end homelessness and to shelter individuals who are experiencing it. The FY 2015/16 budget adopted by the County includes an additional Homeless/Housing Coordination staff person who will be located in the County Administrator’s Office and will work with the Inter­agency Staff Coordinating Group. Response from the Santa Cruz City Council: PARTIALLY DISAGREE ­ Over the last several years there has been an ​ increased number of emergency shelter beds and services in North County. Those projects include the Paul Lee Loft in 2008, and the Recuperative Care Center serving medically vulnerable people who are homeless and being discharged from hospitals in January of 2014. Both of these projects were supported by the City of Santa Cruz. Although as a region we are prioritizing permanent supportive housing, rapid rehousing and prevention, considering additional emergency and interim services is a key action strategy under All­In, the recently adopted county­wide strategic ​ ​ plan, which states: “Engage the community around developing additional emergency and interim services for unmet health and safety needs of persons living outdoors, including small shelters around the county, warming centers and improvements to existing shelters." (All­In ) ​ ​ Response from the Scotts Valley City Council: PARTIALLY DISAGREE ­ Over the last several years there has been an ​ increased number of emergency shelter beds and services in North County. Those projects include the Paul Lee Loft in 2008, and the Recuperative Care Center in January of 2014 serving medically vulnerable people who are homeless and being discharged from hospitals. In addition, while not the subject of this report, additional shelter beds in Watsonville have been or are being opened through the Pajaro Rescue Mission/Teen Challenge and the Paget Center serving homeless veterans, which opened in 2013. Although as a region we are prioritizing permanent supportive housing, rapid rehousing and prevention, considering additional emergency and interim services is a key action strategy under All­In, the recently adopted county­wide strategic ​ ​ plan, which states: “Engage the community around developing additional emergency and interim services for unmet health and safety needs of persons living outdoors, including 15 small shelters around the county, warming centers and improvements to existing shelters.” (All­In ) ​ ​ Obviously, as long as people are sleeping outside more needs to be done to identify the resources needed to end homelessness and to shelter individuals who are experiencing it. The FY 2015/16 budget adopted by the Board of Supervisors includes an additional Homeless/Housing Coordination staff person who will be located in the County Administrator’s Office and will work with the Inter­agency Staff Coordinating Group. Response from the Chief Executive Officer, Encompass: AGREE Response from the Executive Director, Homeless Services Center: AGREE

The effectiveness of the North County Emergency Winter Shelter is limited by its reliance on the National Guard Armory facility. Response from the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors: PARTIALLY DISAGREE ­ Use of the National Guard Armory is provided through a ​ "License to Use State Military Facility” between the County of Santa Cruz and the Military Department, State of California. The License makes the armory facility available for use as an Emergency Shelter nightly between the hours of 6:00 PM through 7:00 AM October 15" through April 15" except "during any period that any organization of the State Militia or of the Armed Forces of the United States is conducting drills or other military training or activity at the armory". The License also prohibits the use of intoxicating beverages and tobacco, and stipulates daily cleaning requirements. Use of the facility is in accordance with California Government Code §15301­15301.6 as an emergency response operation in order to prevent “the loss of life” of homeless persons during winter weather conditions. The State requires the operator to ensure basic safety and security. Parameters set by the State Military Department do not limit the effectiveness of the Armory; it is likely that any site used for this purpose would have many of the same limitations. The primary issues are the number of beds and the costs associated with transporting clients. Limited night time only access to shelter in a crowded facility not intended as a shelter is not a program that anyone would design to effectively end homelessness. The goal of the winter shelter program is to provide emergency nighttime shelter. Cold weather emergency shelter does not solve homelessness ​ for individuals but is a last resort humanitarian provision of shelter. Response from the Capitola City Council: PARTIALLY DISAGREE ­ The National Guard Armory is accessed through a ​ “License to Use State Military Facility” between the County of Santa Cruz and the Military Department, State of California. The License makes the armory facility 16 available for use as an Emergency Shelter nightly between the hours of 6:00 PM through 7:00 AM October 15th through April 15th except “during any period that any ​ ​ ​ ​ organization of the State Militia or of the Armed Forces of the United States is conducting drills or other military training or activity at the armory.” Besides limiting hours of use the License prohibits the use of intoxicating beverages and tobacco, and stipulates daily cleaning requirements. Use of the facility is controlled by California Government Code §15301­15301.6 as an emergency response operation in order to prevent “the loss of life” of homeless persons during winter weather conditions. The State requires the operator to ensure basic safety and security. Limited nighttime­only access to shelter in a crowded cavernous facility is not a program that anyone would design to effectively end homelessness. The goal of the winter shelter program is to provide emergency night­time shelter. Cold weather emergency shelter does not solve homelessness for individuals but is a last resort humanitarian provision of shelter. Parameters set by the State Military Department are not the primary factor limiting effectiveness of the Armory; it is likely that any site used for this purpose would have many of the same limitations. The primary factors that limit the effectiveness of the Armory are outlined elsewhere in the Grand Jury report, and include the number of beds and the costs associated with transporting clients to the site. Response from the Santa Cruz City Council: PARTIALLY DISAGREE ­ The National Guard Armory is accessed through a ​ “License to Use State Military Facility” between the County of Santa Cruz and the Military Department, State of California. The License makes the armory facility available for use as an Emergency Shelter nightly between the hours of 6:00 PM through 7:00 AM October 15th through April 15th except “during any period that any organization of the State Militia or of the Armed Forces of the United States is conducting drills or other military training or activity at the armory”. Besides limiting hours of use the License prohibits the use of intoxicating beverages and tobacco, and stipulates daily cleaning requirements. Use of the facility is in accordance with California Government Code §15301­15301.6 as an emergency response operation in order to prevent “the loss of life” of homeless persons during winter weather conditions. The State requires the operator to ensure basic safety and security. Parameters set by the State Military Department are not the primary factor limiting effectiveness of the Armory; it is likely that any site used for this purpose would have many of the same limitations. The primary factors that limit the effectiveness of the Armory are outlined elsewhere in the Grand Jury report, and include the number of beds and the costs associated with transporting clients to the site. Response from the Scotts Valley City Council: PARTIALLY DISAGREE ­ The National Guard Armory is accessed through a ​ “License to Use State Military Facility” between the County of Santa Cruz and the 17 Military Department, State of California. The License makes the armory facility available for use as an Emergency Shelter nightly between the hours of 6:00 PM through 7:00 AM October 15th through April 15th except “during any period that any organization of the State Militia or of the Armed Forces of the United States is conducting drills or other military training or activity at the armory”. Besides limiting hours of use the License prohibits the use of intoxicating beverages and tobacco, and stipulates daily cleaning requirements. Use of the facility is in accordance with California Government Code §15301­15301.6 as an emergency response operation in order to prevent “the loss of life” of homeless persons during winter weather conditions. The State requires the operator to ensure basic safety and security. Limited nighttime­only access to shelter in a cavernous crowded facility is not a program that anyone would design to effectively end homelessness. The goal of the winter shelter program is to provide emergency night­time shelter. Cold weather emergency shelter does not solve homelessness for individuals but is a last resort humanitarian provision of shelter. Parameters set by the State Military Department are not the primary factor limiting effectiveness of the Armory; it is likely that any site used for this purpose would have many of the same limitations. The primary factors that limit the effectiveness of the Armory are outlined elsewhere in the Grand Jury report, and include the number of beds and the costs associated with transporting clients to the site. Response from the Chief Executive Officer, Encompass: AGREE Response from the Executive Director, Homeless Services Center: AGREE

The absence of a back­up plan to replace the National Guard Armory threatens the continuing existence of the North County Emergency Winter Shelter program. Response from the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors: PARTIALLY DISAGREE ­ As described above, the Armory is a facility that ​ provides minimal emergency winter shelter. The building is owned by the State Department of the Military and access to it for cold weather shelter is dependent on the State’s ability to provide staffing at the facility. While the State’s ability to provide access is assessed annually, the Military Department has demonstrated a commitment to continue the program. The County and the four cities jointly provide funding to operate emergency winter shelter programs through the Homeless Action Partnership (HAP) and have demonstrated their commitment to emergency winter shelter by providing decades of funding for the programs. On multiple occasions the jurisdictions have sought to identify alternative sites for winter shelter. There are very limited sites that could serve this purpose. Potential alternative sites have been ruled out for reasons ranging from neighborhood 18 concerns, transportation requirements, access to services required to safely run an emergency program (meals, bathrooms, showers) and cost. As stated above, emergency shelter does not end or shorten an individual’s experience of homelessness and the significant reduction of homelessness (44% reduction since 2013 according to the 2015 Santa Cruz County Homeless Census and Survey) can be attributed, at least in part, to prioritizing effective programs proven to end homelessness. Programs that have proven to be most effective include permanent supportive housing, programs that prevent a person for losing their current housing, and rapid rehousing programs. Each of the jurisdictions participates in funding for programs that employ these strategies. The jurisdictions appreciate the Grand Jury's concern with the issues of homelessness and the jurisdictions working together through the HAP Executive Committee will continue to seek alternatives to the current programs to support both long­term and short­term emergency shelter options. ​ ​ Response from the Capitola City Council: PARTIALLY DISAGREE ­ As described above, the Armory is a facility that ​ provides minimal emergency winter shelter. The building is owned by the State Department of the Military and access to it for cold weather shelter is dependent on the State’s ability to provide staffing at the facility. While the State’s ability to provide access is assessed annually, the Military Department has demonstrated a commitment to continue the program. The County and the four cities jointly provide funding to operate emergency winter shelter programs through the Homeless Action Partnership (HAP) and have demonstrated their commitment to emergency winter shelter by providing decades of funding for the programs. On multiple occasions the jurisdictions have sought to identify alternative sites for winter shelter. There are very limited sites that could serve this purpose. Potential alternative sites have been ruled out for reasons ranging from neighborhood concerns, transportation requirements, access to services required to safely run an emergency program (meals, bathrooms, showers) and funding. Finally, an alternative site would require significant investments of financial capital and political will. As stated above, emergency shelter does not end or shorten an individual’s experience of homelessness and the significant reduction of homelessness our community has experienced recently (44% reduction since 2013 according to the 2015 Santa Cruz County Homeless Census and Survey) can be attributed, at least in part, to prioritizing effective programs proven to end homelessness. These programs include permanent supportive housing and prevention and rapid re­housing. Each of the jurisdictions participates in funding for programs that employ these strategies. The jurisdictions appreciate the Grand Jury’s concern with the issues at the Armory and will continue to seek alternative sites for emergency cold weather shelter. Response from the Santa Cruz City Council: PARTIALLY DISAGREE ­ As described above, the Armory is a facility that ​ provides minimal emergency winter shelter. The building is owned by the State Department of the Military and access to it for cold weather shelter is dependent on the State's ability to provide staffing at the facility. While the State's ability to provide access is assessed annually, the Military Department has demonstrated a commitment to continue the program. The City of Santa Cruz along with the County and the two other north county cities jointly provide funding to operate the emergency winter shelter program through the Homeless Action Partnership (HAP) and have demonstrated a commitment to emergency winter shelter by providing decades of funding for the programs. On multiple occasions the jurisdictions have sought to identify alternative sites for winter shelter. There are very limited sites that could serve this purpose. Potential alternative sites have been ruled out for reasons ranging from neighborhood concerns, transportation requirements, access to services required to safely run an emergency program (meals, bathrooms, showers) and funding. Finally, an alternative site would require significant investments of financial capital and political will. Emergency shelter does not end or shorten an individual's experience of homelessness and the significant reduction of homelessness our community has experienced recently (44% reduction since 2013 according to the 2015 Santa Cruz County Homeless Census and Survey) can be attributed, at least in part, to prioritizing effective programs proven to end homelessness. These programs include permanent supportive housing and prevention and rapid rehousing. The City of Santa Cruz as well as each of the other jurisdictions participates in funding for programs that employ these strategies. The jurisdictions appreciate the Grand Jury's concern with the issues at the Armory and will continue to seek alternative sites for emergency cold weather shelter. Response from the Scotts Valley City Council: PARTIALLY DISAGREE ­ As described above, the Armory is a facility that ​ provides minimal emergency winter shelter. The building is owned by the State Department of the Military and access to it for cold weather shelter is dependent on the State’s ability to provide staffing at the facility. While the State’s ability to provide access is assessed annually, the Military Department has demonstrated a commitment to continue the program. The County and the four cities jointly provide funding to operate emergency winter shelter programs through the Homeless Action Partnership (HAP) and have 20 demonstrated their commitment to emergency winter shelter by providing decades of funding for the programs. On multiple occasions the jurisdictions have sought to identify alternative sites for winter shelter. There are very limited sites that could serve this purpose. Potential alternative sites have been ruled out for reasons ranging from neighborhood concerns, transportation requirements, access to services required to safely run an emergency program (meals, bathrooms, showers) and funding. Finally, an alternative site would require significant investments of financial capital and political will. As stated above, emergency shelter does not end or shorten an individual’s experience of homelessness and the significant reduction of homelessness (44% reduction since 2013 according to the 2015 Santa Cruz County Homeless Census and Survey) can be attributed, at least in part, to prioritizing effective programs proven to end homelessness. These programs include permanent supportive housing and prevention and rapid rehousing. Each of the jurisdictions participates in funding for programs that employ these strategies. The jurisdictions appreciate the Grand Jury’s concern with the issues at the Armory and the jurisdictions will continue to seek alternative sites for emergency cold weather shelter. Response from the Chief Executive Officer, Encompass: AGREE Response from the Executive Director, Homeless Services Center: AGREE

Insufficient capacity of emergency shelters limits their potential use as an entry point to the planned coordinated entry system. Response from the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors: DISAGREE ­ Developing a coordinated entry system is a key strategy identified in ​ All­In the county­wide strategic plan to address homelessness. A coordinated entry ​ system streamlines and targets crisis response that quickly assess a household’s needs and provides tailored resources for persons in crisis. Coordinated entry is required by the Department of Housing and Urban Development for Continua of Care under the HEARTH Act. The HAP is in the process of developing and identifying funding to implement such a system. The essential premise of a coordinated entry system is to streamline access to services so that there is no “wrong door” for entry to services. While we agree with the Grand Jury’s assessment that emergency shelter is a potential point for a homeless person to access a coordinated entry system, it is not the only access point for services and we are striving to provide a streamlined approach to access homeless services. We fully intend to have all County and City funded emergency shelters participate in the coordinated entry system. Response from the Capitola City Council: DISAGREE ­ Developing a coordinated entry system is a key strategy identified in ​ All­In the county­wide strategic plan to address homelessness. A coordinated ​ entry system streamlines and targets crisis response to quickly assess a household’s needs and provides tailored resources for persons in crisis. Coordinated entry is required by the Department of Housing and Urban Development for Continua of Care under the HEARTH Act. The HAP is in the process of developing and identifying funding to implement such a system. The essential premise of a coordinated entry system is to streamline access to services so that there is no “wrong door” for entry to services. While we agree with the Grand Jury’s assessment that emergency shelter is a potential point for a homeless person to access a coordinated entry system, it is not the only access point for services and we are striving to provide a streamlined range of access to homeless services. We fully intend to have all County and City funded emergency shelters participate in the coordinated entry system. Response from the Santa Cruz City Council: DISAGREE ­ Developing a coordinated entry system is a key strategy identified in ​ All­In the county­wide strategic plan to address homelessness. A coordinated entry ​ system streamlines and targets crisis response that quickly assess a household’s needs and provides tailored resources for persons in crisis. Coordinated entry is required by the Department of Housing and Urban Development for Continua of Care under the HEARTH Act. The HAP is in the process of developing and identifying funding to implement such a system. The essential premise of a coordinated entry system is to streamline access to services so that there is no “wrong door” for entry to services. While we agree with the Grand Jury’s assessment that emergency shelter is a potential point for a homeless person to access a coordinated entry system, it is not the only access point for services and we are striving to provide a streamlined range of access to homeless services. We fully intend to have all County and City funded emergency shelters participate in the coordinated entry system. Response from the Scotts Valley City Council: DISAGREE ­ Developing a coordinated entry system is a key strategy identified in ​ All­In the county­wide strategic plan to address homelessness. A coordinated entry ​ system streamlines and targets crisis response that quickly assess a household’s needs and provides tailored resources for persons in crisis. Coordinated entry is required by the Department of Housing and Urban Development for Continua of Care under the HEARTH Act. The HAP is in the process of developing and identifying funding to implement such a system. The essential premise of a coordinated entry system is to streamline access to services so that there is no “wrong door” for entry to services. While we agree with the Grand Jury’s assessment that emergency shelter is a potential point for a 22 homeless person to access a coordinated entry system, it is not the only access point for services and we are striving to provide a streamlined range of access to homeless services. We fully intend to have all County and City funded emergency shelters participate in the coordinated entry system. Response from the Chief Executive Officer, Encompass: AGREE Response from the Executive Director, Homeless Services Center: AGREE

Insufficient numbers of personnel and case managers at the emergency shelters limit the services that can be provided to homeless individuals. Response from the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors: PARTIALLY DISAGREE ­ There is no question that case management services ​ are a key component to end homelessness for many individuals. This need is recognized by local nonprofit agencies, jurisdictions, the Homeless Action Partnership and Smart Solutions to Homelessness. Case management support linked with access to housing is the solution to homelessness for a significant share of the people experiencing it and there are shelter programs focused specifically on pairing emergency shelter to case management to lead to permanent housing. Services that are offered at the Armory are limited to those required to operate a safe cold weather shelter. Homeless individuals can and do form relationships and build trust with staff with the Homeless Services Center, the program operator, but case management is not specifically part of the program. Case management services provide more value and there is a larger need for these services for people who are on a path to permanent housing. Recognizing the role of year round shelter programs to resolve homelessness, HSC has recently adapted their program at the Pau[l] Lee Loft to pair case management with housing resources for people on a pathway to permanent housing. While resources are constrained, we are constantly looking for opportunities for additional case management funding. In the absence of sufficient funding the community has been providing volunteer resources such as the Wings and the Housing Navigator programs associated with the 180/2020 Initiative. Additional case management is supported through Community Grant programs and has been included in an application for CDBG funds submitted by the County. Response from the Capitola City Council: PARTIALLY DISAGREE ­ There is no question that case management services ​ are a key component to ending homelessness for many individuals. This need is recognized by local nonprofit agencies, jurisdictions, the Homeless Action Partnership and Smart Solutions to Homelessness. Case management support linked with access to housing is the solution to homelessness for a significant share of the people experiencing it and there are shelter programs focused 23 specifically on pairing emergency shelter to case management to lead to permanent housing. Services that are offered at the Armory are limited to those required to operate a safe cold weather shelter. Homeless individuals can and do form relationships and build trust with staff with the Homeless Services Center, the program operator, but case management is not specifically part of the program. There is a much more pressing need for case management services for people who are on a path to permanent housing. Recognizing the role of year round shelter programs to resolve homelessness, HSC has recently adapted their program at the Pau Lee Loft to pair case management with housing resources for people on a pathway to permanent housing. While resources are constrained, we are constantly looking for opportunities for additional case management funding. In the absence of sufficient funding the community has been providing volunteer resources such as the Wings and the Housing Navigator programs associated with the 180/2020 Initiative. Additional case management is supported through Community Grant programs and has been included in an application for CDBG funds submitted by the County. Response from the Santa Cruz City Council: PARTIALLY DISAGREE ­ There is no question that case management services ​ are a key component to ending homelessness for many individuals. This need is recognized by local nonprofit agencies, jurisdictions, the Homeless Action Partnership and Smart Solutions to Homelessness. Case management support linked with access to housing is the solution to homelessness for a significant share of the people experiencing it and there are shelter programs focused specifically on pairing emergency shelter to case management to lead to permanent housing. Services that are offered at the Armory are limited to those required to operate a safe cold weather shelter. Homeless individuals can and do form relationships and build trust with staff with the Homeless Services Center, the program operator, but case management is not specifically part of the program. There is a much more pressing need for case management services for people who are on a path to permanent housing. Recognizing the role of year round shelter programs to resolve homelessness, HSC has recently adapted their program at the Paul Lee Loft to pair case management with housing resources for people on a pathway to permanent housing. While resources are constrained, we are constantly looking for opportunities for additional case management funding. In the absence of sufficient funding the community has been providing volunteer resources such as the Wings and the Housing Navigator programs associated with the 180/2020 Initiative. Additional case management is supported through Community Grant programs and has been included in an application for CDBG funds submitted by the County. Response from the Scotts Valley City Council: PARTIALLY DISAGREE ­ There is no question that case management services ​ are a key component to end homelessness for many individuals. This need is recognized by local nonprofit agencies, jurisdictions, the Homeless Action Partnership and Smart Solutions to Homelessness. Case management support linked with access to housing is the solution to homelessness for a significant share of the people experiencing it and there are shelter programs focused specifically on pairing emergency shelter to case management to lead to permanent housing. Services that are offered at the Armory are limited to those required to operate a safe cold weather shelter. Homeless individuals can and do form relationships and build trust with staff with the Homeless Services Center, the program operator, but case management is not specifically part of the program. There is a much more pressing need for case management services for people who are on a path to permanent housing. Recognizing the role of year round shelter programs to resolve homelessness, HSC has recently adapted their program at the Pau[l] Lee Loft to pair case management with housing resources for people on a pathway to permanent housing. While resources are constrained, we are constantly looking for opportunities for additional case management funding. In the absence of sufficient funding the community has been providing volunteer resources such as the Wings and the Housing Navigator programs associated with the 180/2020 Initiative. Additional case management is supported through Community Grant programs and has been included in an application for CDBG funds submitted by the County. Response from the Chief Executive Officer, Encompass: AGREE Response from the Executive Director, Homeless Services Center: AGREE

Insufficient number of staff dedicated to grant writing results in missed grant funding opportunities. Response from the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors: PARTIALLY DISAGREE ­ The HAP has been very successful in raising funds for ​ homeless services from federal and State sources, bringing in close to $30,000,000 since 2001. Response from the Capitola City Council: PARTIALLY DISAGREE ­ When it was announced this spring that the Homeless ​ Services Center (HSC) was not awarded funding through the State’s Emergency Solutions Grant program it became clear that funding and operating a multi­service program is complex and dynamic. Skilled response to varied and changing funding opportunities is a vital component to stability, and the level of staffing dedicated to fund development is determined by HSC. The HAP has been very successful in raising funds for homeless services from federal and State sources, bringing in close to $30,000,000 since 2001. Response from the Santa Cruz City Council: PARTIALLY DISAGREE ­ When it was announced this spring that the Homeless ​ Services Center (HSC) was not awarded funding through the State's Emergency Solutions Grant program it became clear that funding and operating a multi­service program is complex and dynamic. Skilled response to varied and changing funding opportunities is a vital component to stability, and the level of staffing dedicated to fund development is determined by HSC. The HAP has been very successful in raising funds for homeless services from federal and State sources, bringing in close to $30 million since 2001. Response from the Scotts Valley City Council: PARTIALLY DISAGREE ­ When it was announced this spring that the Homeless ​ Services Center (HSC) was not awarded funding through the State’s Emergency Solutions Grant program it became clear that funding and operating a multi­service program is complex and dynamic. Skilled response to varied and changing funding opportunities is a vital component to stability, and the level of staffing dedicated to fund development is determined by HSC. The HAP has been very successful in raising funds for homeless services from federal and State sources, bringing in close to $30,000,000 since 2001. Response from the Chief Executive Officer, Encompass: AGREE Response from the Executive Director, Homeless Services Center: AGREE