Santa Clara County Grand Jury • 2001-2002

Review of the Santa Clara County Keyboard Project Abstract services. While the Grand Jury found little

Published: September 25, 2001 10 pages
Ver PDF original

Note: Missing finding numbers detected: F3, F4, F5

Findings and Recommendations 4 findings

F1
The county to the KEYBOARD system requirements before issuing a request for proposals to software aggressively pursuing
No recommendations for this finding
F2
The KEYBOARD project, involving the concurrent processes of re-engineering and CONCLUSION software development, created the difficult requirement to manage evolving user The KEYBOARD project was viewed by the county as a visionary improvement needed for requirements while working within the the 21st century by both the government and restrictions of a software contractor on a the public realities of the information age. fixed price contract. This situation created project complexity and high risk and While the measurable savings from the project were few, the Grand Jury agrees with the contributed to schedule and cost problems. county that the agenda process improvements in quality, information availability and The board did not request a management
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Write the project system requirements document based on the re-engineering effort
F6
Based on documents reviewed, the Grand Jury finds that the board was presented the failed define project status at regular intervals.
No recommendations for this finding
F7
The county is integration contractors. reimbursement of KEYBOARD development expenses from the state.
No recommendations for this finding

Additional Recommendations 1

These recommendations are not explicitly linked to specific findings.

Conclusions 1

Comments 1

No Responses Found 1

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

Santa Clara County County