Shasta County Grand Jury
• 2025-2026
Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Consolidated Final Report2.61 MB
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 5 findings
F1
The Redding City Council did not receive documentation that would have allowed council members and the public to have a clear understanding of Advance Redding's financial position to justify the request for the grant and the reduction in rent.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
On or before December 31, 2026, the Redding City Council direct the Redding City Manager to adopt procedures which educate and emphasize the duty of its support staff to provide all relevant information to the council and the public prior to any action taken.
F2
Some Redding City Council members failed in their duty to exercise due diligence by not requesting background information from Advance Redding or other sources when it was not provided to the council when considering and approving the grant request and reduction in rent.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Effective immediately, each member of the Redding City Council must exercise due diligence in considering any requests for city funds.
F3
Documents and interviews produced during this investigation support the grant request and the reduction in rent. Detailed supporting documents would not have influenced the approval of the grant request and reduction in rent by the city council.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
Develop a written schedule for capital improvements and modernization of infrastructure by April 2027.
F4
The Redding City Council did not receive notification of Advance Redding’s donation in support of Measure A before considering the grant request, resulting in citizen and council concerns that Advance Redding may have used grant money to donate to a political campaign.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
Recategorize customers into agricultural, wildlife habitat, industrial, and municipal by April 2027.
F5
Documents and interviews substantiate that the donation by Advance Redding in support of Measure A was proper and its disclosure to the City Council would not have influenced the approval of the grant request and reduction in rent.
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
Target new categories and market service to prospective customers by October 2027.
Additional Recommendations 1
These recommendations are not explicitly linked to specific findings.
-
R6Implement a written district flood management and preparedness plan and provide training for staff, customer base, and any other impacted parties by April 2028.
In the News 1
News coverage of this report, automatically tracked.
Shasta County Grand Jury releases report on Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation District operating at a deficit - Action News Now
Action News Now
· June 11, 2026