Shasta County Grand Jury
2025-2026
From the annual report
The consolidated year-end volume. The individual investigations it contains are listed separately below.
📑 Year-End Report
The full consolidated volume; individual reports are listed below.
Individual reports (3)
Quick View
Full Details →
Findings & Recommendations
2 findings
F1:
The physical facilities at the Shasta County Juvenile Rehabilitation Facility provide a safe, clean, and secure environment for the detained juveniles in compliance with Title 15; however, due to the age of the facility, some infrastructure repairs and upkeep are needed.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1:
The Shasta County Board of Supervisors ensures funding is available to make the necessary infrastructure repairs and direct the Chief of Probation to complete noted repairs.
F2:
The Juvenile Rehabilitation Facility is run by a dedicated and professional team who meets the needs of the juveniles.
Quick View
Full Details →
Findings & Recommendations
4 findings
F1:
ACID has operated at a deficit for nine out of the previous ten years.
F2:
ACID is in the process of addressing approximately four years of deferred maintenance.
F3:
ACID inaccurately categorizes a 100% agricultural customer base.
F4:
ACID lacks any formal flood management and preparedness plan for the canal.
Additional Recommendations
6
Not linked to specific findings.
R1:
Implement a written plan to decrease expenditures and increase revenue by April 2027.
R2:
Implement a written schedule for ongoing inspection and canal maintenance by April 2027.
R3:
Develop a written schedule for capital improvements and modernization of infrastructure by
R4:
Recategorize customers into agricultural, wildlife habitat, industrial, and municipal by April
R5:
Target new categories and market service to prospective customers by October 2027.
R6:
Implement a written district flood management and preparedness plan and provide training
Quick View
Full Details →
Findings & Recommendations
5 findings
F1:
The Redding City Council did not receive documentation that would have allowed council
F2:
Some Redding City Council members failed in their duty to exercise due diligence by not
F3:
Documents and interviews produced during this investigation support the grant request and
F4:
The Redding City Council did not receive notification of Advance Redding’s donation in
F5:
Documents and interviews substantiate that the donation by Advance Redding in support of
Additional Recommendations
2
Not linked to specific findings.
R1:
On or before December 31, 2026, the Redding City Council direct the Redding City
R2:
Effective immediately, each member of the Redding City Council must exercise due