Orange County Grand Jury
• 2022-2023
• Agency Response
Response to:
Welcome to the Neighborhood - Are cities responsibly managing the integration of group homes?
Welcome to the Victor Cabral Neighborhood*
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 11 findings
F1
Group homes too close to one another contribute to the problems associated with overconcentration. Response - Agree
No recommendations for this finding
F2
Common nuisances are more likely and disruptive when sober living homes are concentrated in a small geographic area of a neighborhood. Response - Agree
No recommendations for this finding
F3
Some cities have successfully addressed and informed community members about the challenges faced in regulating group homes. Response - Agree
No recommendations for this finding
F4
Community satisfaction was minimal when cities took the traditional public comment approach towards addressing community complaints. Response - Agree
No recommendations for this finding
F5
Cities are not utilizing police, fire, and code enforcement complaints as a means of locating and tracking Group Homes. Response – Disagree wholly with this Findings that implies that the only way to locate and track group home is via complaints, rather than other pro-active methods such as business licensing, which San Clemente requires.
No recommendations for this finding
F6
Cities are inhibited from enacting and enforcing ordinances due to fears over the potential cost of litigation. Response - Agree
No recommendations for this finding
F7
Several cities have created an ordinance that requires a ministerial permit or registration to operate a group home, however many of these cities do not enforce their ordinances. Response – Disagree in part with the Finding, in that lack of enforcement does not apply to San Clemente. San Clemente enforces its ordinances.
No recommendations for this finding
F8
City and County officials are deterred from regulating group homes by California Housing and Community Development's housing element approval process. Response - Agree
No recommendations for this finding
F9
Cities have historically strategized and acted independently in addressing group home challenges and solutions. Response – Disagree in part with the Finding, as this statement does not apply to San Clemente. San Clemente has consulted and coordinated with other cities to discuss solutions to the challenges faced by the overconcentration of group homes and unlicensed facilities, including exploring best practices and lessons learned, and using that information to develop a successful ordinance.
No recommendations for this finding
F10
Well-operated group homes can integrate smoothly into neighborhoods. Response - Agree
No recommendations for this finding
F11
There is a lack of regulatory oversight for the health and safety of residents of unlicensed group homes. Response - Agree
No recommendations for this finding
* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.