📋
Extraído del Informe Consolidado

Esta investigación fue publicada originalmente como parte de un informe consolidado más amplio que contiene múltiples investigaciones. Consulte el PDF consolidado para ver el documento completo.

San Bernardino County Grand Jury • 2010-2010

County of SAN Bernardino Grand Jury

Published: June 30, 2010 9 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings and Recommendations 12 findings

F1 Page 15
At the start of the 2009-2010 budget year, there was a total of $16,124,895.00 budgeted for Priority Policy Needs and Board Elective Projects.
Related Recommendations (1)
R10-01
Page 17
Transfer remaining balance from both Priority Policy Needs and Board Elective Projects discretionary funding back into the County general fund for the next couple of years to help offset the County budget shortfall, and especially to help fund necessary improvements. (Findings 1, 11)
F2 Page 15
Over the last several years, Supervisors have transferred hundreds of thousands of dollars from their Discretionary Funds to fund additional staffing of their Districts.
No recommendations for this finding
F3 Page 15
For the Final 2009-2010 Budget, the five Supervisors transferred $2,671,810.00 from their Priority Policy Needs Allocations to fund additional staffing in their Districts.
No recommendations for this finding
F4 Page 15
During the first 6 months of the current budget year, the Supervisors spent a total of $1,570,665.00 from Priority Policy Needs funds. However, only $321,357.00 (21%) was spent on Priority Policy Needs projects, but $1,249,308.00 (79%) on their office staffing.
No recommendations for this finding
F5 Page 15
Funding for the Board of Supervisors’ additional staffing taken from the “Priority Policy Needs” allocations appear with the code “Budgeted PPN Offset.” It is difficult to know this line is for Supervisors’ staff.
Related Recommendations (1)
R10-02
Page 17
Budgeting for all Board of Supervisors’ staffing should be included in the general budget and coded the same as all county personnel costs. (Finding 5)
F6 Page 15
One District transferred $765,499.00 from the 2009-2010 Budget to fund additional staff, which is $15,499.00 more than the amount the District was allocated from the Priority Policy Needs budget. 5 2009-2010 San Bernardino County Grand Jury Final Report
No recommendations for this finding
F7 Page 16
Since the 2003-2004 Budget, the number of Supervisor’s budgeted staff has increased from 39.5 to 65 in 2009-2010, a 63.5% increase.
No recommendations for this finding
F8 Page 16
According to the Secretary of State, since 2004, the County population has only increased by 5.85%, from 1,946,993 to 2,066,950 at the beginning of 2010, an increase of 113,957.
No recommendations for this finding
F9 Page 16
There are no guidelines or specific written documentation which states how many staff a Supervisor may hire.
No recommendations for this finding
F10 Page 16
All Supervisors’ staffs are contract employees.
No recommendations for this finding
F11 Page 16
For the 2009-2010 Budget year, the Districts’ budgeted staff size, including the Supervisor, are District 1 16 District 2 11 District 3 13 District 4 17 District 5 10 Currently, District 1 has one vacancy and District 4 has four vacancies, so there are only 62 staff and Supervisors.
No recommendations for this finding
F12 Page 16
With the current state of the economy and the County facing a $90 million budget shortfall for the 2010-2011 budget, the County will undoubtedly have to make considerable cutbacks in all departments and services. 6 2009-2010 San Bernardino County Grand Jury Final Report
No recommendations for this finding

Additional Recommendations 1

These recommendations are not explicitly linked to specific findings.

Commendations 3

No Responses Found 1

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

San Bernardino City