Orange County Grand Jury • 2012-2013 • Agency Response
Response to: La Palma Police Department 11/12/13, 1.20 MB

Victims" Dear Judge Borris: The City is in receipt of the 2012-2013 Orange County Grand Jury Report*

Published: September 26, 2013 3 pages
View Original PDF

Note: Missing finding numbers detected: F2, F3

Findings and Recommendations 4 findings

F1 Page 1
Finding F1 states, "Municipalities in Orange County cities are well-versed in EEO issues and maintain exemplary compliance strategies." City of La Palma Response to
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Page 1
Recommendation R1 states, "All OC cities and County government shall include funding for training of management and supervision as required by law and ensure training for all employees every two to three years." City of La Palma Response to
F4 Page 1
Finding F4 states, "Complaint rations between Orange County cities and the County of Orange are similar; but differences in how previous complaints were handled in the County led to major problems." City of La Palma Response to
No recommendations for this finding
F5 Page 1
Finding F5 states, "The County and several cities do not offer, or provide limited, training in harassment, discrimination, and retaliation, particularly for line staff. At this time, although line staff training is not required, all staff benefit from EEO." City of La Palma Response to
No recommendations for this finding
F6 Page 1
Finding F6 states, "There are several Risk Management Joint Powers Insurance Pools (of which most cities are members) to ensure adequate coverage and sharing of liability with other member entities." City of La Palma Response to
No recommendations for this finding

Additional Recommendations 2

These recommendations are not explicitly linked to specific findings.

* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.