Los Angeles County Grand Jury • 2005-2006

Final Report - 2005 - 2006

Published: June 06, 2006 352 pages Consolidated Report
View Original PDF

Findings 18 findings

F1 Page 70
Insufficient resources are being devoted to the Emergency Survival Program (ESP). The Office of Emergency Management (OEM) is currently devoting approximately one- half of a staff-year to this internationally recognized program. An expanded program would increase the level of adoption of preparedness measures by County residents. The dividends to be reaped from a successful program can be measured in lives saved when a serious emergency occurs. It takes time and resources to design or manage such a program. More time is needed to: • Solicit corporate sponsorships for program elements • Implement programs • Measure their effect on adoption. If many residents can care for themselves for at least several days, and if at least some residents can begin to help their neighbors or workmates until professional assistance arrives, emergency responders can concentrate on the most critical situations where their interventions are literally a matter of life and death. The costs of rescuing residents that are unprepared will be high. An effective preparedness program will materially reduce those costs, both in scarce financial resources and irreplaceable human life.
F2 Page 70
OEM does not have sufficient resources to evaluate and adopt social marketing practices. Resource constraints and staffing shortages have limited the amount of OEM staff time available for ESP. Staff skilled in implementing social marketing campaigns that impact social behavior could build on the information gathered by Public Health. With it, they can design even more effective campaigns to galvanize residents into action. The Center for Disease Control sponsors grants for social marketing of health information. OEM and the Public Health could obtain funding for social marketing outreach. Outreach to universities and other institutions might also prove fruitful. The cost of such an attempt to the County would be the provision of additional OEM staff resources or the cost of contracting for such services. Both additional internal resources and contracted assistance may be needed to launch a social marketing program successfully in the area of resident emergency preparedness. 54 2005-2006 County of Los Angeles Civil Grand Jury The Civil Grand Jury notes the following as potentially fruitful approaches: • Arranging for emergency kits that are inexpensive and easy to acquire • Encouraging in-school and after-school programs to assemble kits so that children may bring kits home to their families • Establishing incentive programs for residents who make or buy kits • Distributing collateral material, such as small flashlights, that both remind the recipient of the need to prepare and provide an object useful in an emergency • Presenting a hierarchy of citizen-preparedness as options, such as: o No kit, no plan: be a victim o Full plan, full kit: be a survivor o CERT member, ham radio operator: be a community asset
F3 Page 71
ESP and other communication materials are not available in all languages spoken in Los Angeles County. County officials estimate that more than 100 languages are spoken in the metropolitan area. Census Bureau data show that more than 50% of Los Angeles County households use a language other than English at home. Currently, some ESP materials are translated into 12 languages. This is a gap in the emergency preparedness system. Foreign-born immigrants may know less about Los Angeles and its emergency response system than others. It may be even more important for individuals who do not speak English or Spanish to have advance information about emergency preparedness, as they may have difficulty understanding instructions in English or Spanish from emergency responders and general broadcast information from the media. The ability to translate and disseminate messages rapidly is especially important during health emergencies. One of the key factors in limiting the number of people exposed to communicable disease is the speed with which a warning message can be 2005-2006 County of Los Angeles Civil Grand Jury 55 communicated. Public Health does not have contracts in place which will assure a four- hour turnaround on the translation of messages.
F4 Page 72
Local governments can do more to encourage their employees to prepare for emergencies. The U.S. Census Bureau reports 607,911 government employees in Los Angeles County, including federal, state, municipal organizations, and authorities. The City and County of Los Angeles together employ approximately 150,000 staff. Emergency response requires firefighters and police officers. It also requires medical personnel, transportation workers, helicopter pilots, communication technicians, public health professionals, and utility workers. If these emergency responders have prepared their homes and families, they will be able to care for residents in an emergency without worrying about the safety of their loved ones. Recent experience with Hurricane Katrina underscores the importance of employee preparedness. Press reports and the observations of professional responders who were present in New Orleans indicate that many municipal employees had not made adequate preparations for an emergency. When Hurricane Katrina hit, many employees went home to care for their families and were unable to return. 56 2005-2006 County of Los Angeles Civil Grand Jury Most governmental agencies in Los Angeles County distribute emergency preparedness materials and information to their employees. The County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works (DPW) and Internal Services Department (ISD) have written policies that encourage staff to prepare their families to take care of themselves in emergencies. Many fire departments have programs to encourage their staff members to make preparations at home and attend to their families in the early stages of emergency response. Local governments in Los Angeles County can do more to support their employees in preparing for emergencies. In the event of an emergency, these preparations will make the difference between an effective response and chaos.
F5 Page 73
Vulnerable populations require special efforts to ensure their preparedness for emergencies. Based on 2002 census data, there are approximately 10 million people in Los Angeles County, the most populous County in the nation. The same census data show that about 6.5% of these people receive some form of public assistance. According to the Individual Tax Return Summary published by the Internal Revenue Service, almost 20% of those filing tax returns in 2002 showed adjusted annual incomes of $10,000 or less. These figures suggest that up to 2 to 3 million residents of Los Angeles County do not have the means to purchase and store emergency supplies and equipment. The most vulnerable populations are the old, the homeless, the disabled, the unemployed, children, and the poor. In an emergency, these individuals may be without transportation and emergency supplies. Local government has the responsibility to provide a safety net and, with the assistance of other concerned groups, care for those who cannot care for themselves. This population suffered the most in Hurricane Katrina. Residents with animals are also vulnerable in an emergency. Many people will not evacuate leaving their animals behind. The Topanga Emergency Plan addresses the needs of animal owners. This work should be expanded and strengthened to encompass more areas in Los Angeles County.
F6 Page 74
Community Emergency Response Teams (CERT) are a vital communications link in the event of an emergency. The County of Los Angeles and other jurisdictions should support programs that train and encourage citizen volunteers to provide assistance to both their neighbors and emergency responders, building necessary relationships to draw on when emergencies happen. These programs, including ham radio networks and CERT, are necessary for community preparedness. Jurisdictions within the County were national leaders in the development of CERT 20 years ago; and LASD runs a National CERT Conference annually. This year, LASD expects more than 450 participants from around the United States. CERT is well-developed in Los Angeles County with many local fire and law enforcement departments training CERT volunteers. Jurisdictions outside of Los Angeles have sponsored programs that organize block groups into disaster response teams and set up Citizen Corps that meet quarterly to discuss issues and reinforce the importance of preparedness.
F7 Page 85
Ham radio operators augment communications in the case of major infrastructure damage. Ham radio operators provide an important channel when the rest of the communication infrastructure collapses. This situation happened in Los Angeles during the 1994 Northridge earthquake.
F8 Page 85
Residents in Los Angeles County will benefit from moving towards increased communication interoperability. Currently, the best practice recommended by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security is a standards based shared platform because of its user-friendly ability to quickly connect among emergency responders. With the rapidly-changing opportunities provided by technical innovation, it is likely that this best practice will be replaced by different technology. As an example, New York State is investing in a state-wide emergency communication system that uses satellite equipment and Internet Protocol radio capability. Moving Los Angeles County jurisdictions to increased communication interoperability will be facilitated if the governance board can serve as the forum to resolve the issues. Communication interoperability can be increased incrementally if independent procurement decisions support that goal. Over time, this will permit migration of the equipment used by all emergency responders to a common standard, while realizing the maximum benefit from existing systems. Ultimately, changes in procurement should reflect the current mutual aid practices that share resources beyond the borders of Los Angeles County. While much of this report has focused on police and fire communications, communication needs of other responder agencies must be considered and funded. In devastating natural disasters, Emergency Medical Services, Public Health, and Coroner employees need to deal with a disease outbreak. Department of Public Works staff members will be needed to clear roadways and excavate emergency routes for emergency responders. Animal control departments need to assure the safety of animals and the public. 2005-2006 County of Los Angeles Civil Grand Jury 69
F9 Page 86
LARTCS will continue to be needed. LARTCS is needed to provide emergency communications links to state, federal, and other jurisdictions, even if jurisdictions move to a standards-based shared platform or participate in a proprietary, shared platform such as ICIS. LARTCS will be required to provide links to jurisdictions not on the platform, e.g., Orange County agencies, Ventura County agencies, federal or state agencies, and assisting agencies from other states.
F10 Page 86
Emerging technology can significantly increase communication capabilities and make them more resistant to infrastructure damage. Emerging technologies hold great promise for strengthening emergency communication in Los Angeles County. The Los Angeles Regional Common Operational Picture Program (LARCOPP) and Emergency Business Information System (EBIS) increase the ability to respond quickly and effectively. Furthermore, the emergency response in the County will be more resistant to damage of its infrastructure. Emerging technologies are powerful and expensive, a financial burden that may surpass the resources of any one agency. It is incumbent upon elected officials in the County, to join forces in collaborative efforts to share systems, technology, and resources.
F11 Page 87
Insufficient resources are provided to train workers needed to operate and maintain emergency communication systems. New technologies that provide additional communication interoperability are often complex. They are typically purchased with grant or capital funds. Often the grants or voter-approved bond funds do not provide for training, operations, and maintenance resources needed to keep the systems in working order. These activities must be funded by local government. New and interoperable communication systems must compete for funding with a large number of other pressing needs. When communication systems are replaced, capital funds are allocated for a new system. In some cases, the purchase includes an initial order of replacement parts and components and initial staff training. Subsequent operations, training, maintenance staff resources, and parts require local funding.
F12 Page 87
The use of communication systems for extended periods can be hampered by shortages of parts and maintenance training. As the systems age, manufacturers of the systems no longer produce parts and components.
F13 Page 263
Alleged child care fraud is referred by the APPs to the DPSS Welfare Fraud Prevention Section. This section checks the referral to ensure that all pertinent documents are attached to the referral. DPSS investigates the allegations of fraud and may refer the case to the County of Los Angeles District Attorney for prosecution. The Civil Grand Jury is concerned that in a one year period hundreds of referrals from the APPs to the DPSS Welfare Fraud Section resulted in only ten referrals to the District Attorney’s office. Some DPSS Welfare Fraud Prevention Section personnel have inadequate training to detect evidence of fraud. .
F14 Page 263
Misrepresentation of employment is a major source of welfare fraud: • Some parents in the welfare to work program earn very little income - a few hundred dollars per month - but are reimbursed thousands of dollars per month for miles driven and child care expenses. • The same person (child care provider) who is paid by the County to provide child care services may also be receiving In Home Support Services (IHSS) from the County. The IHSS worker is provided to individuals to assist them in activities of daily living. A CalWORKS participant/parent could be employed to provide IHSS services to the same person (child care provider) providing their child care. There is no cross check. • Fictitious names of employers and places of employment have been “verified” by phone calls made to co-conspirators. • Some parents work as aides with the IHSS Program and receive thousands of dollars in mileage. • Some parents claim to work for relatives. • Some parents conspire with friends or relatives to fraudulently claim child care benefits and split the money. • Some parents claim to provide tutoring during the hours the child is in school. • Some child care providers claim hours for care during the hours the child is in school. 2005 – 2006 County of Los Angeles Civil Grand Jury 247
F15 Page 264
DPSS has stated that: “There is no limit, currently, to the number of hours allowed to the parent for paid child care per day”.
F16 Page 264
Trustline Registry Form: this form “….was created by the California Legislature to offer parents, employment agencies, Child Care Resource and Referral Programs (APPs and DPSS), and child care providers access to a background check conducted by the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) which includes checks of the California Criminal History System and Child Abuse Central Index (CACI) at the DOC and FBI records.” This form is processed for DPSS by the appropriate State licensing department and the State advises that it may take six weeks or more to complete.
F17 Page 264
The County of Los Angeles Administrative Memorandum Number 00- 10, dated 5-22-00, defines a license-exempt provider’s own children in the following way: “The definition of a license-exempt child care provider’s own children include all grandchildren, nieces, nephews, and first cousins for whom child care services are being provided. These children are considered immediate family members and there is no limitation on the number that may be cared for. In addition, the license-exempt provider may also provide child care services for the children of one other family. Child care payments may be authorized during the same time period for all of the children whose parents are participating in CalWORKS welfare-to-work activities or working.” This broad, unlimited definition of license-exempt provider’s own children encourages fraud and abuse of the system.
F18 Page 265
DPSS contracts with outside agencies to provide services for the GAIN case management in two new GAIN regional offices to perform vital steps in the CalWORKS process. These contract worker positions include case workers, supervisors, and clerk typists.

Recommendations 22

Conclusions 9

Commendations 12

No Responses Found 3

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

County of Los Angeles Agency
Los Angeles County County
Los Angeles County Sheriff Elected County Office