Yuba County Grand Jury • 2008-2009

of Investigation

Published: June 25, 2009 81 pages Consolidated Report
View Original PDF

Findings 5 findings

F1
The select list of contractors employed by MJUSD for its lease-leaseback contracting is a closed pool of contractors with little or no competition. This has resulted in a closed and exclusive list of contractors, subject to favoritism or abuse, noted by the large percentage of contract dollars awarded to two general contractors with previous relationships to personnel in the Facilities Department.
F2
The Facilities Department has no established criteria for the hiring of local subcontractors to enable the bond money to stay within the community and there are no established procedures for adding new contractors on a regular basis to ensure securing “best value” for the taxpayers.
F3
The MJUSD needs to establish a method to ensure the ethics laws of California are being adhered to in the contracting of services. The staff at MJUSD is not provided ethics training at this time.
F4
There is minimal review of lease-leaseback contracts by the MJUSD Board. The Board is given a listed contractor on a project by the Facilities Department. The Board does not have the opportunity to review the full range of proposals to ensure equity, fairness and oversight in awarding contracts paid by public bond funds.
F5
The dissolution of the RHCSD is being considered by the County and LAFCO. The County is in the process of determining the liability of the bonds for which the RHCSD has administrative responsibilities.

Recommendations 5

Commendations 4

No Responses Found 1

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

Marysville Joint Unified School District School District