San Luis Obispo County Grand Jury • 2009-2010

Port San Luis:

Published: September 23, 2010 13 pages
Ver PDF original

Findings and Recommendations 10 findings

F1
Over time the focus of the Harbor District has changed from just operating the harbor to developing a recreational vehicle resort and other commercial facilities and managing holdings in Avila Beach.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
- 9. The responses shall be submitted to the Presiding Judge of the San Luis Obispo Superior Court by September 23, 2010. Please provide a copy of all responses to the Grand Jury as well. The mailing addresses for delivery are: Presiding Judge Grand Jury Presiding Judge Charles S. Crandall San Luis Obispo County Grand Jury Superior Court of California P.O. Box 4910 1050 Monterey Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93402 San Luis Obispo, CA 93408 APPENDIX A
F2
The basin that serves the sport launch has sanded in to the extent that the floating dock is often on land and the available water is insufficient to float a boat. Potential customers and potential income to the District may be lost as a result.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
The large boat traveling mobile hoist pier should be extended into deeper water so that large craft can be hauled and launched on a regular basis even if that requires expenditure of District funds.
F3
The end of the large mobile hoist pier is in relatively shallow water which makes it difficult, often times impossible, to haul or launch large craft. Potential customers could be lost and potential income to the District may be lost as a result. Defined in Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary as “a fee without any restriction to any class of heirs or restrictions on transfer of ownership.”
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
A competitive bidding policy should be established and consistently utilized for concessionaires.
F4
The boatyard operation agreement expires June 30, 2010. The Board is extending that agreement with increased rents in lieu of competitive bidding. This is a sound approach only in the short term.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
Commissioners should recuse themselves and not influence votes on issues involving a service provider with whom they have a business relationship. Guidance from the Fair Political Practices Commission should be sought on such matters.
F5
The Harbor District has no competitive bidding policy for concessionaires.
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
Commissioners who are members of the Avila Yacht club should not vote on issues that involve the club and the District.
F6
Commissioners who own boats which are at the harbor rely upon services of concessionaires and vote on contracts with these concessionaires.
Related Recommendations (1)
R6
The District should implement policy for rental of the assembly room in the Gateway Building. That policy should include a fee schedule and guidelines for when those fees may be waived. The policy should avoid any possible appearance of conflicts of interest.
F7
At least one commissioner has Yacht Club membership and has voted on issues involving the Club.
Related Recommendations (1)
R7
The District should promote the rental availability of the assembly room.
F8
There is no promotion of the availability of the assembly room in the Gateway Building for rental to the public and it has not been rented as was intended. This may represent lost income opportunity.
Related Recommendations (1)
R8
The District should provide more financial report detail. It should list such assets such as each pier, each building and each major piece of equipment. In the revenue and expenditure statement, it should provide specific income and expense lines for the parking lot in Avila Beach and each concession. Annual District budgets also should each contain corresponding line items.
F9
District balance sheets, income and cash flow statements only provide a general picture by using broad categories and avoiding specifics. The budgets for income and expenses do not each include a line item for the Avila Beach parking lot.
Related Recommendations (1)
R9
Any agreement to develop and lease the Harbor Terrace property needs to contain assurance that the District retains fee simple ownership.
F10
The Harbor District is in negotiations with a developer on the property it owns overlooking the harbor for a recreational vehicle resort and other commercial development.
No recommendations for this finding

No Responses Found 1

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

Port San Luis Harbor District Special District