📋
Extraído del Informe Consolidado

Esta investigación fue publicada originalmente como parte de un informe consolidado más amplio que contiene múltiples investigaciones. Consulte el PDF consolidado para ver el documento completo.

Santa Barbara County Grand Jury • 2019-2020

Santa Barbara County Courthouse

Published: June 30, 2019 4 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 9 findings

F1
The current Contract does not fully address future water management problems such as will arise from climate and other rapid environmental changes.
F2
Public understanding and effective operation of the Cachuma Project would be enhanced if key terms in the Contract were defined and used more precisely.
F3
The roles and responsibilities of SBCWA and the Member Units are not clearly defined in the current Contract.
F4
The current Water Year, October 1 to September 30, makes diversion recommendations and decisions difficult because it comes just before the rainy season, when the quantity of water in Cachuma for the next few months is highly unpredictable.
F5
Provisions in the 2020 Contract will need more frequent updating than those in previous Contracts due to rapid climate change altering the natural conditions affecting water supply.
F6
Under the 1995 Contract, Article 9(g), the required five-year meetings cannot result in increased water diversion to Member Units.
F7
Member Units and SBCWA have expressed support for formal, quantitative methods of decision-making under uncertainty which can identify sources of disagreement, and thus facilitate compromise solutions.
F8
SBCWA and the Member Units agree that meetings of their technical staffs are valuable but disagree over the organizational concerns of past meetings, such as claims of infrequency, non-attendance, non- response and cancellation without notice.
F9
The websites of the Member Units and SBCWA lack clarity and detail on the Cachuma Project.

Recommendations 14