Madera County Grand Jury • 2018-2019

Central California Women's Facility

Published: June 28, 2019 117 pages Consolidated Report
View Original PDF

Findings 12 findings

F1
The MCGJ finds that the property within CSA-21, that contains the Cascadel Clubhouse, on four lots within three parcels of land, is owned by the County of Madera.
F2
The MCGJ finds that the County of Madera is currently responsible for upkeep, maintenance, insurance (both property and liability), for those properties noted in F1.
F3
The MCGJ finds the County of Madera does not have an agreement with CSA 21 for road maintenance nor improvement.
F4
The MCGJ finds that currently there is not a multi-year contract in effect between the County and a contractor for mowing and maintenance of the properties.
F5
The MCGJ finds that the area around and adjacent to the Clubhouse, including the land parcels, are a designated “Shelter in Place” zone for the residents in the event of fire blocking egress from Cascadel Woods.
F6
The MCGJ finds that the amount collected from property owners is insufficient to cover the cost of maintenance and expenses currently paid by the County. 7
F7
The MCGJ finds that DSS and CAPMC work well together.
F8
The City of Madera does not follow its Purchasing-Central Supply Mission Statement regarding conflicts of interest.
F9
City administrators and elected officials are doing personal business with the City as private individuals.
F10
The City of Madera shows a lack of transparency towards residents of the City of Madera and the Madera County Grand Jury.
F11
The MCGJ found no labeling of water supply or drain lines to equipment at well site #14.
F12
The City of Chowchilla’s Personnel Rules and Regulations as well as the Public Works Policy and Procedure Manual do not provide direction for employees dealing with water related complaints and entering private dwellings.

Recommendations 12