2023-2024 Grand Jury Final Report*
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 10 findings
Recommendations 7
-
R1Page 56All jurisdictions should expedite the acquisition and distribution of residential containers that meet the CalRecycle standardized colors. Additionally, until the Report compliant containers can be distributed, all jurisdictions should ensure the 2 distribution of labeling for non-compliant containers that explain the current SB 1383 requirements applicable to their jurisdiction by June 30, 2025. <b>Funding and Enforcement</b>
-
R2Page 56By December 31, 2024, all jurisdictions should ensure their waste hauling agreements are in compliance with State statute so that haulers may be designated to perform certain required tasks but are not improperly delegated overall responsibility for compliance. Additionally, all jurisdictions should ensure that any fines collected by a hauler are forwarded to the jurisdiction.
-
R3Page 56The OCGJ recommends that all jurisdictions utilize a dedicated waste and recycling enterprise fund for collection of fines for non-compliance with SB 1383 by December 31, 2024. <b>Education and Outreach</b>
-
R4Page 56By December 31, 2024, all jurisdictions should diversify the methods and media used for education and outreach to include, among others, various social media platforms, emails to residents, newspaper, television, flyer mailings, community events, and appearances at other public gatherings.
-
R5Page 56By December 31, 2024, and in order to gauge the effectiveness of their education and outreach efforts, all jurisdictions should develop new methods to engage residents directly to help determine their awareness of the requirements associated with SB 1383, such as surveys, online quizzes, and door-to-door polling. <b>Procurement of Recovered Organic Waste Products</b> By June 30, 2025, the OCGJ recommends that all jurisdictions participate in the
-
R6Page 56OCW&R-led efforts to develop a coordinated county-wide approach to the organics recycling infrastructure and programs as well as procurement requirements associated with SB 1383, working towards creating circular economy as a long-term goal. Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste
-
R7Page 57By December 31, 2024, the Orange County Board of Supervisors and all Orange County cities should lobby appropriate members of the State Legislature and/or CalRecycle to revise the organic waste diversion targets to better reflect Orange County's waste amounts, revise the jurisdictions' procurement requirements to better represent the limited options currently available for procurement, the jurisdictions' varying populations, population densities, and geographic size, Report and to delay associated enforcement actions by the State. RESPONSES The following excerpts from the California Penal Code provide the requirements for public agencies to respond to the Findings and Recommendations of this Grand Jury report: Section 933 (c) No later than 90 days after the grand jury submits a final report on the operations of any public agency subject to its reviewing authority, the governing body of the public agency shall comment to the presiding judge of the superior court on the findings and recommendations pertaining to matters under the control of the governing body, and every elected county officer or agency head for which the grand jury has responsibility pursuant to Section 914.1 shall comment to the presiding judge of the superior court, with an information copy sent to the board of supervisors, on the findings and recommendations pertaining to matters under the control of that county officer or agency head and any agency or agencies which that officer or agency head supervises or controls. In any city and county, the mayor shall also comment on the findings and recommendations. All of these comments and reports shall forthwith be submitted to the presiding judge of the superior court who impaneled the grand jury. A copy of all responses to grand jury reports shall be placed on file with the clerk of the public agency and the office of the county clerk, or the mayor when applicable, and shall remain on file in those offices. One copy shall be placed on file with the applicable grand jury final report by, and in the control of the currently impaneled grand jury, where it shall be maintained for a minimum of five years. Section 933.05. (a) For purposes of subdivision (b) of Section 933, as to each grand jury finding, the responding person or entity shall indicate one of the following: (1) The respondent agrees with the finding. (2) The respondent disagrees wholly or partially with the finding, in which case the response shall specify the portion of the finding that is disputed and shall include an explanation of the reasons thereof. 2023-2024 Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste (b) For purposes of subdivision (b) of Section 933, as to each grand jury recommendation, the responding person or entity shall report one of the following actions: (1) The recommendation has been implemented, with a summary regarding the implemented action. Report (2) The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented 2 in the future, with a timeframe for implementation. (3) The recommendation requires further analysis, with an explanation and the scope and parameters of an analysis or study, and a timeframe for the matter to be prepared for discussion by the officer or head of the agency or department being investigated or reviewed, including the governing body of the public agency when applicable. This timeframe shall not exceed six months from the date of publication of the grand jury report. (4) The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or is not reasonable, with an explanation, thereof.
Commendations 11
-
CM1 Page 138Central Newport Beach Community Association provided important data and various studies on E-bike usage in Newport Beach
-
CM2 Page 27Orange County Criminal Justice Coordinating Council (OCCJCC) - The OCCJCC is to be commended for its efforts to improve public safety through greater inter-agency communication, coordination and collaboration regarding law enforcement and administration of justice issues including mental health.28 28 Orange County Board of Supervisors Resolution No. 2001-38, Adopted February 6, 2001, OCCJCC Proposed Reorganization. 2023-2024
-
CM3 Page 13Law Enforcement's Response to Mental Health Calls for Service Report Orange County Intake Release Center (IRC) - The IRC is to be commended for partnering with the OCHCA to reduce inmate behavioral health crises.
-
CM4 Page 54County of Orange, OC Waste & Recycling is commended for having successfully met SB 1383 mandates, developing new composting infrastructure, a model education and outreach program, moving towards robust and repurposing recycling programs, and developing gas-to-energy facilities to produce renewable Report energy. 2 City of Mission Viejo, Solid Waste Program is commended for their proactive implementation of SB 1383 mandates, distributing compliant waste containers to all residents, and producing a robust outreach and education program using numerous delivery methods. City of Santa Ana Public Works, Trash and Recycling Program is commended for proactively revising their hauler contract to meet SB 1383 requirements, producing a notable and ongoing outreach and education program, distributing compliant waste containers to all residents, and fostering a highly collaborative relationship with their hauler.
-
CM5 Page 86Thank you! The following organizations and agencies are commended for contributing to the 2023- 2024 Grand Jury's goal of better understanding the use of Al in public schools:
-
CM6 Page 86Santa Ana Unified School District
-
CM7 Page 86Superintendents/delegates who responded to the OCGJ Survey Orange Unified School District, Department of Information Technology Orange County Department of Education Orange County Board of Education 2023-2024
-
CM8 Page 73Use of Artificial Intelligence in Public Schools (K-12), It's Not Elementary
-
CM9 Page 115The OCGJ commends the Orange County Assessor's Office for being one of only a few assessor offices in California that has a full-time Taxpayer Advocate. The Taxpayer Advocate provides an important resource for taxpayers who may have questions or concerns about their property taxes or assessments.
-
CM10 Page 173Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) - The Irvine Ranch Water District successfully acquired 5 water providers serving 57,000 residents since 1999. These consolidations provide reliable water supply at equitable rates, which are mutually beneficial to all customers. City of San Clemente - Based on interviews and a comprehensive site visit, the OCGJ found the City of San Clemente does an excellent job in maintaining and operating its water and wastewater utility systems. This integrated system augments the City's local recycled water sources and is beneficial in reusing urban runoff and reducing biosolids. Report 47 South Coast Water District, CA (scwd.org)
-
CM11 Page 153Emerging Opportunities in South County Water/Wastewater Systems
Agency Responses 5
Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.
* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.