Score: +2 (2/0/0)
Ventura County Grand Jury • 2022-2023

Addressing District-Based Representation for the Ojai City Council

Published: May 04, 2023 12 pages
Ver PDF original

Findings and Recommendations 6 findings

F01
The Grand Jury finds that all Ojai City Council members elected in 2020 and 2022 were in compliance with the provisions of Ordinance No. 889 at the time of their election. [SF-01, SF-02]
No recommendations for this finding
F02
The Grand Jury finds there is no requirement for city council members to report a change of residency as defined in the California Election Code upon moving out of their district. [SF-03, SF-04]
No recommendations for this finding
F03
The Grand Jury finds that, after an election, there is no provision for the Ojai City Clerk to periodically re-verify city council members continue to reside within their district in compliance with Ojai Municipal Code No. 889, Section 2.6-105. [SF-05]
No recommendations for this finding
F04
The Grand Jury finds one Ojai City Council seat is vacant pursuant to the requirements of Ojai Municipal Code Ordinance No. 889, Sections 2.6-105 and 2.6-107. [SF-06, SF-07]
No recommendations for this finding
F05
The Grand Jury finds Ojai City officials have failed to acknowledge that a vacancy exists on the Ojai City Council. [SF-08, SF-09]
No recommendations for this finding
F06
The Grand Jury finds that interim appointment from within the district, special election, or the Quo Warranto process are suitable remedies to address the vacancy on the Ojai City Council. [SF-08, SF-09] Addressing District-Based Representation for the Ojai City Council 5 RECOMMENDATIONS
No recommendations for this finding

Agency Responses 1

Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.