Humboldt County Grand Jury
• 2012-2013
• Agency Response
Board of Supervisors County Humboldt*
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Recommendations 4
-
R2Page 1Train food inspectors to take a water sample at the same time they are performing their routine inspections. This would relieve the water system owner from taking a sample, delivering it to a private laboratory and paying for that service. The cost of County lab work could be added to the yearly permit required by DEH without a significant increase of cost to DEH and a potential savings to the owner. This recommendation will not be implemented, because it is not warranted or reasonable. Having DEH collect water samples would probably not decrease the costs to the operator because food inspections would not necessarily align with water sampling schedules required by state law and could require additional trips for quarterly or monthly sampling. Having DEH take on water sampling responsibility would increase costs to the Department because significant additional sampling would be required. Additionally, DEH does not have the authority to require operators to utilize the County for sampling so any charge would need to be separate from the yearly permit fee.
-
R3Page 1Have DEH conduct all water sampling to ensure sample integrity. This recommendation will not be implemented, because it is not warranted or reasonable. Under California Code of Regulations section 64212. Bacteriological quality monitoring, state small water system operators shall collect at least one sample quarterly and submit the results to the local health officer. Food facility water system operators also have the responsibility for sampling under state law. If all food facility and state small water system samples were collected by DEH, an estimated 100 additional water collection trips would be required annually. Providing this service would result in significant additional costs to the program and require additional staff and fees to the operators. Additionally the Board of Supervisors does not have legal authority to require operators to utilize DEH for all water sampling. To help insure sampling integrity the County initially provides operators written and verbal instructions on water sample collection as well as a demonstration of proper sample collection techniques. DEH has knowledge of the water systems falling under County regulation and collects at least one sample a year.
-
R4Page 2DEH should inspect private water systems serving the public quarterly instead of annually. This recommendation will not be implemented, because it is not warranted. Changing the inspection of private water systems from once per year to four times per year would result in a significant cost increase to the water system owners. Providing this additional level of regulatory oversight would increase expenses for the program and require additional staff. These expenses would ultimately be passed on to the operators in the form of increased fees for the program. DEH believes that a once per year County inspection combined with required sampling and State inspections is an adequate level of regulatory oversight for protection of pubic health and safety for a food facility or small water system. The California Department of Public Health also inspects the public water systems in Humboldt County once every two to five years. These inspections are very thorough and include a review of the physical setting, condition of the water system components, maintenance records, testing results, an interview with the operator, and possibly the collection of a water sample.
-
R5Page 2Post signs indicating the date of the last inspection. This recommendation will not be implemented, because it is not warranted. Food facility operators are required by state law (Health and Safety Code section 113725.1 Inspection report availability) to maintain a copy of the most recent routine inspection report and make it available to the consumer upon request. The operator is also required to post a sign advising that a copy of the most recent inspection report is available for review by any interested party. The condition of the water supply is indicated on the inspection report. If there is a condition with the water supply threatening the public safety, then there will be a boil water notice posted in public view or the food facility will be closed. The Board of Supervisors does not have authority to require operators to post a sign indicating when the water system was last inspected.
* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.