⚠️ Aviso de traducción:
Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations
15 findings
Counselors and psychiatrists are not readily available for existing and potential mental health clients.
Related Recommendations (1)
HSA should improve client access to mental health services by increasing available counseling hours for psychologists and psychiatrists at the Emeline facility. (F1)
The lack of implementation of electronic health records (EHR) hampers mental health service to clients.
Related Recommendations (2)
HSA should use Electronic Health Records (EHR) for all mental and medical health services. (F2)
HSA should use EHR to perform quantitative evaluations of program effectiveness. (F2, F3)
Quantitative evaluation of the success of Prop 63 programs is extremely challenging without the implementation of an EHR.
Related Recommendations (1)
HSA should use EHR to perform quantitative evaluations of program effectiveness. (F2, F3)
The apparent lapses of direct communication between the Advisory Board, HSA, and the Board of Supervisors impedes the Advisory Board’s goals of effective advocacy for clients and advising HSA concerning Prop 63 funded mental health programs.
Related Recommendations (2)
HSA should regularly attend the Mental Health Advisory Board meetings and should respond directly to the concerns raised. (F4)
The Mental Health Advisory Board should quickly and clearly communicate to HSA all issues that come before the Board. (F4)
The mandated stakeholder meetings are not successfully attracting participation by county residents.
Related Recommendations (1)
HSA should publicize mental health programs and promote them in a way that will educate and engage the larger community. (F5)
Five vacancies on the 11member Advisory Board left it ineffective for months during our investigation.
Related Recommendations (1)
The Board of Supervisors should fill all Advisory Board vacancies in a timely manner. (F6)
The Board lacks consistent standards to evaluate the performance of the District Manager.
No recommendations for this finding
SLVWD consistently fails to provide timely meeting minutes or post important information on the District’s website.
No recommendations for this finding
SLVWD makes it difficult for ratepayers to obtain public records from the District Office by requiring prior approval from the District Manager.
No recommendations for this finding
State water rights evaluations will delay the prospective start date of the Regional Water Transfer Project.
No recommendations for this finding
Without modification, the SCWD Tait Street treatment facility is not large enough to accommodate the needs of the Regional Water Transfer Project.
No recommendations for this finding
Officials in SCWD and SqCWD have not given sufficient consideration to a regional recycling plant.
No recommendations for this finding
A water recycling facility would allow for injection wells to either help recharge the aquifer or to build a barrier against seawater intrusion.
No recommendations for this finding
Because there is no detailed groundwater model of the Purisima basin, it is difficult to do the studies and research needed to protect the aquifer.
No recommendations for this finding
Private pumpers have unregulated access to water and do not contribute financially to aquifer protection efforts.
Related Recommendations (1)
The Basin Implementation Group should establish a Replenishment District for the Purisima aquifer. (F15)
No Responses Found
1
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.