📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Napa County Grand Jury • 2013-2014

I. 2013-2014 Napa County Grand Jury

Published: April 25, 2013 19 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 18 findings

F1 Page 1
During 2003-2008 few new buses were purchased while NCTPA expanded its
F2 Page 1
According to data collected during the period of 2001 to 2012, VINE ridership
F3 Page 1
NCTPA has had more than $10 million rolled over annually in its reserve TDA
F4 Page 1
The video/camera system at NCJH is outdated and insufficient for
F5 Page 1
A new VINE Transit Center and consolidated NCTPA office complex was
F6 Page 1
A redesigned VINE route system began service December 3, 2012 and had
F7 Page 1
A monthly VINE dashboard for the NCTPA Board of Directors (BOD) was
F8 Page 1
There is a lack of community awareness of numerous route changes, additional
F9 Page 1
Marketing of the VINE bus service is not perceived as a high priority for NCTPA
F10 Page 1
Open since December 2012, the new NCTPA Office/VINE Transit Center does
F11 Page 1
Emergency work requests are processed verbally, but not always
F12 Page 1
VINE services are not optimally promoted on website home pages of the
F13 Page 1
The VINE currently does not employ sufficient financial, quantitative and
F14 Page 1
Planning for VINE proper (Napa inner-city) routes does not utilize TransitOriented-Development (TOD) methodologies for achieving the most sustainable
F15 Page 1
NCTPA lacks a coordinated logistics management system for its many different
F16 Page 1
As demands increase upon its role in congestion management and transportation
F17 Page 1
Some volunteer work performed on the School District’s playing
F18 Page 1
The NVUSD assumed the responsibility of collecting field use fees

Recommendations 17