📋
Extraído del Informe Consolidado

Esta investigación fue publicada originalmente como parte de un informe consolidado más amplio que contiene múltiples investigaciones. Consulte el PDF consolidado para ver el documento completo.

Napa County Grand Jury • 2013-2014

I. 2013-2014 Napa County Grand Jury

Published: April 25, 2013 19 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 18 findings

F1 Page 1
During 2003-2008 few new buses were purchased while NCTPA expanded its
F2 Page 1
According to data collected during the period of 2001 to 2012, VINE ridership
F3 Page 1
NCTPA has had more than $10 million rolled over annually in its reserve TDA
F4 Page 1
The video/camera system at NCJH is outdated and insufficient for
F5 Page 1
A new VINE Transit Center and consolidated NCTPA office complex was
F6 Page 1
A redesigned VINE route system began service December 3, 2012 and had
F7 Page 1
A monthly VINE dashboard for the NCTPA Board of Directors (BOD) was
F8 Page 1
There is a lack of community awareness of numerous route changes, additional
F9 Page 1
Marketing of the VINE bus service is not perceived as a high priority for NCTPA
F10 Page 1
Open since December 2012, the new NCTPA Office/VINE Transit Center does
F11 Page 1
Emergency work requests are processed verbally, but not always
F12 Page 1
VINE services are not optimally promoted on website home pages of the
F13 Page 1
The VINE currently does not employ sufficient financial, quantitative and
F14 Page 1
Planning for VINE proper (Napa inner-city) routes does not utilize TransitOriented-Development (TOD) methodologies for achieving the most sustainable
F15 Page 1
NCTPA lacks a coordinated logistics management system for its many different
F16 Page 1
As demands increase upon its role in congestion management and transportation
F17 Page 1
Some volunteer work performed on the School District’s playing
F18 Page 1
The NVUSD assumed the responsibility of collecting field use fees

Recommendations 17