Sonoma County Grand Jury
• 2021-2022
• Agency Response
Response to:
Affordable Housing: Past, Present and Future
Re 0 Nd Eonsidered
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Note: Missing finding numbers detected: F6, F7
Findings and Recommendations 8 findings
F2
Page 2
The use of self-reported data in monitoring is the accepted norm. The City of Cloverdale somewhat disagrees with this finding. For ownership units, the City has historically relied upon deed restrictions in place to alert lenders and lien holders of the for-sale restrictlons, who then in turn, contact the City regarding refinances, sales, etc. For rental units, the City has historically relied upon the monitoring and compliance that is routinely required by lending agencies for compliance with tax credit eligibility.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Page 4
The Sonoma County Community Development Commission and the nine Cities resume on-site monitorinB by october 1, 2022. lF3, F4l The City of Cloverdale does not have sufficient staff at this time to implement this recommendation. However, the city will consider hiring a third-party consultant or partner with the county to perform monitoring and compliance of affordable housing units in the city and on-site inspections of all properties will be scheduled when a housing specialist is hired.
F3
Page 2
On-site (in-person) monitoring beyond that required by law is rare due to insufficient personnel, budgetary limitations, and relatively low incentives. The City of Cloverdale agrees with this finding. At this time, the City does not have the resources to conduct annual onsite inspections. However, the City does conduct on-site inspections when requested by residents.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
Page 4
ByJanuary 1, 2023, the Sonoma County Community Development Commission and the nine Cities review and ensure that they have sufficient personnel to conduct onsite monitoring and process self-reported monitoring data to meet future Regional Housing Needs Allocations. (FL, F2, F3, F5,
F4
Page 2
COVID-19 further reduced in-person, on-site monitoring due to public health restrictions. The City of Cloverdale agrees with this finding. On-site monitoring did not occur and was reduced and/or waived by federal funders to ensure the safety of the community and staff.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
Page 2
Surprise or unscheduled monitoring of individual units is not done, for reasons of privacy, availability, effi ciency, and practicality. The City of Cloverdale agrees with this findlng. The City does not have sufficient staffing to perform on- site monitoring. However, for privacy and due process concerns, prior notice for site visits would be scheduled to accommodate on-site staff and residents.
No recommendations for this finding
F8
Page 3
There is limited or no standardized training in Affordable Housing compliance regulations for developers and managers of inclusionary housing within the nine cities. The City of Cloverdale agrees with this finding as there is no ongoing standardized training for the City or countywide. However, the City would participate in any training related to affordable housing compliance.
No recommendations for this finding
F9
Page 3
The cities of Petaluma and Rohnert Park use computerized compliance monitoring programs to facilitate and improve the quality of their work. The City of Cloverdale supports the finding made by the Civil Grand lury. The City would be interested in the use of affordable computerized compliance monitoring programs if available.
No recommendations for this finding
F10
Page 3
The property titles of Affordable single-family houses have not always been flagged as deed restricted. The City of Cloverdale supports the finding made by the Civil Grand Jury, however current City staffs experience with the resale or refinancing of affordable single-family houses has revealed that deed restrictions are in place as the City is contacted by the lending institutions regarding flagged properties. Our understating is all affordable single-family houses have deed restrictions. Prior to the release of any resale restrictions city staff works to review any relevant regulatory agreements, title reports, deal documents, and escrow instructions to ensure all transactions including recorded documents and deed restriction are in place, and recorded in the proper order.
No recommendations for this finding
F11
Page 3
The maiorlty of the housing representatives the Grand Jury interviewed felt that there is not enough staf, within their departments to make anyone a full-time compliance monitor. The City supports the finding made by the Civil Grand Jury (CGJ). However, the City does not have specific knowledge of which jurisdictions were interviewed, nor does the City know what other jurisdictions may have told the CGJ. The City would welcome a county-wide centralized monitoring system. City of Cloverdole Responses to Recommendotions
No recommendations for this finding
No Responses Found 1
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.
Cloverdale
City