Santa Cruz County Grand Jury • 2014-2015

County of Santa Cruz Grand Jury Final Report 2014­2015 Photos by Anne­Marie DeSoto

Published: April 16, 2015 221 pages Consolidated Report
Ver PDF original

Findings 14 findings

F1 Page 26
The operations and activities of the Santa Cruz City Schools Parcel Tax Oversight ​ Committee lack the transparency required for public oversight committees, including a website with posted meeting times and locations, agendas, minutes, and membership for the current year and prior historical records.
F2 Page 26
The Parcel Tax Oversight Committee has not complied with operating rules ​ defined by the Board of Education with respect to quorum or length of term.
F3 Page 26
The Parcel Tax Oversight Committee has not consistently tracked the attendance ​ or responded to continued absences of its appointed members.
F4 Page 26
The Parcel Tax Oversight Committee has not provided annual oversight reports in any consistent or predictable format accessible to the general public.
F5 Page 26
The lack of publicly available information regarding open positions on the Parcel Tax Oversight Committee leaves taxpayers who are not associated with Santa Cruz City Schools unaware of opportunities to serve on the Parcel Tax Oversight Committee.
F6 Page 26
For the 2013­14 school year (the first year of the new Measures I and J) the Parcel Tax Oversight Committee failed to meet, monitor expenditures and report to the community.
F7 Page 26
Neither the Parcel Tax Oversight Committee nor Santa Cruz City Schools has been able to verify that the Parcel Tax Oversight Committee has met its responsibility to monitor expenditures and report annually to the community.
F8 Page 26
Santa Cruz City Schools Board of Education has not defined the form that the annual report should take.
F9 Page 26
Administrative and clerical duties have been assigned to the counselors, counseling secretaries, and library staff, who are funded by parcel tax money. The use of parcel tax money to pay for administrative and clerical costs is contrary to the intent of the measure language.
F10 Page 26
Santa Cruz City Schools failed in its obligation to provide annual information ​ regarding the allocation of parcel tax funds.
F11 Page 26
The Board of Education has failed to follow its own explicit commitments for the ​ proportional allocation of parcel tax funds.
F12 Page 26
The Parcel Tax Oversight Committee, Board of Education Trustees, and Santa ​ Cruz City Schools staff disagree concerning the Parcel Tax Oversight Committee’s role in making expenditure recommendations.
F13 Page 26
The Board of Education has failed to provide a formal charge to the members of ​ the Parcel Tax Oversight Committee.
F14 Page 26
The Board of Education has failed to require the Parcel Tax Oversight Committee to comply with the Brown Act.

Recommendations 1

Conclusions 1

Commendations 5

No Responses Found 1

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

Santa Cruz City Elementary School District School District