⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 5 findings
F1
Page 17
The Tulare County Office of Education (TCOE) and school districts within Tulare County use the annual results of the CAASPP as a tool to assess the needs of students.
F2
Page 17
Student test scores are not indicators that individual students will graduate from high school. There is no data available to indicate that students benefit academically from taking the tests.
F3
Page 17
Data indicates students in Tulare County scored below the average rates in the state of California. However, scores have shown improvement over previous years.
F4
Page 17
The graduation rate indicates that many students who receive a standard diploma scored below the acceptable standards of the CAASPP.
F5
Page 17
Official data is not available regarding the performance of individual high school graduates and their results on the CAASPP. CONCLUSION: The CAASPP is one assessment tool of student academic progress. Passing scores are not used as prerequisites to graduating from high school.
Recommendations 5
-
R1Page 17That more information be disseminated to parents and the public regarding the purposes of the CAASPP, the use of the results and its role in the academic progress and support of the individual student. 10
-
R2Page 24The TCSO should continue to target selected programs for enhancement to a “best-of-class” status.
-
R3Page 24The TCSO should strive to increase revenue sources from Federal, State and other grant sources.
-
R4Page 32VT and TCAT should continue the review of a “regional transportation plan” concept, with the overriding goal being to achieve operating efficiencies and better service. REQUESTED RESPONSES: 1. City of Visalia Transit Division: Findings F1-F3 Recommendations R1-R4 2. Tulare County Area Transit: Findings F1 and F3 Recommendations R3 and R4 ***Disclaimer*** Grand Jury reports are based on documentary evidence and the testimony of sworn or admonished witnesses, not on conjecture or opinion. However, the Grand Jury is precluded by law from disclosing such evidence except upon specific approval of the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court, or another judge appointed by the Presiding Judge (Penal Code Section 911, 924.1 (a) and 929). Similarly, the Grand Jury is precluded by law from disclosing the identity of witnesses except upon an order of the court for narrowly defined purposes (Penal Code Section 924.2 and 929). TULARE PUBLIC CEMETERY DISTRICT BACKGROUND: The Tulare Public Cemetery District (TPCD) is an independent special district which operates within the city of Tulare. The District was formed on August 1, 1927 by a resolution from the Tulare County Board of Supervisors (TCBOS). It operates under the provisions of the California Health and Safety Code (CHSC), the California Government Code (CGC) relating to Special Districts and under the guidance of the California Brown Act in conducting meetings. The TPCD operates two cemeteries within the district’s boundaries. Both cemeteries are located within the city limits of Tulare. REASON FOR INVESTIGATION: Tulare County Civil Grand Jury (TCCGJ) received no fewer than three separate citizen complaints, alleging various violations by the TPCD Board of Trustees. METHOD OF INVESTIGATION: 1. Conducted interviews 2. Reviewed relevant documents and data 3. Conducted site visits 4. Attended multiple board meetings of TPCD and TCBOS. FACTS: 1. The TPCD Board of Trustees consists of five members who are appointed by the TCBOS. Trustees are appointed to four year terms and are required to reside within the boundaries of the District. The governing Board has had multiple turnovers in recent years. 2. The District’s bylaws section C-1 sets forth the fourth Thursday of each month for regular Board meetings. 3. Health and Safety Code 9065 (f) requires income (interest) from the Endowment Care Fund be deposited in an Endowment Income Fund and be spent solely for the care of the cemeteries owned by the district. 4. In August of 2019, $389,147 of accumulated interest was authorized to be transferred from the Endowment Care Fund to the County to be invested with 2% going to maintenance of the Cemetery. 5. The $389,147 transferred from the endowment care fund was accrued interest (over 30 plus 26 years) that had not been transferred previously as required by law. The amount was computed by a private outside accounting firm employed by TPCD. 6. CGC Section 53234 et seq. requires Trustees to receive Ethics training every two years. 7. Section 9026, (subsections (b) and (c)) of the CHSC enables a Board of Supervisors to intervene in such cases where it is deemed to be necessary and/or appropriate and to appoint itself to serve as the governing board of a district. 8. Staff and Board members have indicated that they have had insufficient training to meet the needs of the District. 9. The TPCD has failed to display the Agenda of the forthcoming meetings 72 hours prior to the meeting, as required by the Brown Act. 10. Despite much public attention focused on the dysfunctionality of the TPCD’s Board of Trustees, the TCBOS, has thus far declined to exercise its authority under the section of the CHSC 9026. 11. Members of the group Caring Cause speak up in board meetings before they are recognized by the Chairman and interrupt speakers during public comment sessions.
-
R5Page 35The TCBOS consider exercising its authority under the applicable sections of the CHSC 9026 with a view toward bringing the governance of the TPCD into compliance with generally accepted practices and State requirement.
Conclusions 28
-
CL1 Page 34The TCBOS has neglected to provide essential oversight to ensure that the public interest is served. They continue to reappoint trustees who have demonstrated an inability/unwillingness to adhere to accepted practices as they relate to conduct of Cemetery District board meetings.
-
CL2 Page 18Tulare County Office of Education Findings F1-F5, Recommendation R1. ***Disclaimer*** Grand Jury reports are based on documentary evidence and the testimony of sworn or admonished witnesses, not on conjecture or opinion. However, the Grand Jury is precluded by law from disclosing such evidence except upon specific approval of the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court, or another judge appointed by the Presiding Judge (Penal Code Section 911, 924.1 (a) and 929). Similarly, the Grand Jury is precluded by law from disclosing the identity of witnesses except upon an order of the court for narrowly defined purposes (Penal Code Section 924.2 and 929). 11
-
CL3 Page 19Conducted interviews FACTS:
-
CL4 Page 20CWS has seven resource homes that qualify (per AB 403) to care for youth with special needs.
-
CL5 Page 20Social Workers and resource families working with Special Needs Youth require specialized training.
-
CL6 Page 20The total number of youth under the supervision of CWS is 1,101. Currently 56 cases are special needs (5.09%).
-
CL7 Page 20CWS has an ongoing recruiting program for Special Needs Resource Families.
-
CL8 Page 20CWS has an ombudsman program to assist Resource Families.
-
CL9 Page 20CWS has a 24 hour hot line to aid Resource Families. FINDINGS: F1: There are not enough trained Resource Families to meet the needs required by AB 403. F2: Placement of Special Needs Youth can be with an individual Resource Family, extended family member or a Short Term Residential Treatment Center. F3: Recruitment efforts are extensive throughout the County at different organized events: • County events • School events • Recreation events • Private events/meetings (such as clinics, hospitals, schools and clubs) F4: The specific special needs categories also include youth with the following conditions: • Diabetes • G-Tube • Tracheotomy • Non- Ambulatory F5: CWS is looking for Care Families who possess the following characteristics: • Caring and flexible • Willing to transport youth to medical appointments • Willing to learn from and receive training by doctors on how to care for a youth’s healthcare needs • Willing to attend appointments in various settings including clinics and hospitals • Experienced in caring for youth with health needs or are willing to learn CONCLUSIONS: Health and Human Services Agency is committed to meeting the requirements of AB 403. 13
-
CL10 Page 31Both TCAT and VT have a Capital Budget program that includes the replacement of buses on a scheduled basis. VT is under a federal mandate to convert one-half of its fixed route bus fleet to all electric by 2040.
-
CL11 Page 31Currently, there are preliminary discussions about a “regional transportation plan” that would consolidate separate providers under one authority structure. FINDINGS: F1. Public transportation in Tulare County would not exist if its only revenue source was ridership fares. Public transportation is highly dependent on subsidies from various government and public sources. 24 F2. Recent complaints about the consolidations have been addressed and in three instances the issues were resolved to the satisfaction of the public. F3. TCAT and VT cooperate with each other for transfer programs for riders. Together, they have a “consolidate and cooperate” attitude.
-
CL12 Page 34Members of the group Caring Cause speak up in board meetings before they are recognized by the Chairman and interrupt speakers during public comment sessions. FINDINGS: F1. Office staff was using antiquated bookkeeping practices which led to inaccurate and lost payroll documents as well as endowment fund practices not being followed for several years. Payroll was done by averaging hours rather than hours worked. F2. Information contained in the Board packets are frequently incomplete and not all members are provided information to which they are entitled. Requests on August 29, 2019, September 30, 2019 and October 10, 2019 by a board member for information was not received by the board member. F3. “Caring Cause” is a volunteer group, which is disruptive to Board meetings. F4. TCCGJ found no evidence to confirm that required ethics training had been administered. F5. The cemetery district addressed accounting issues with new accounting practices and software. F6. The TCBOS has neglected to provide essential oversight to ensure that the public interest is served. They continue to reappoint trustees who have demonstrated an inability/unwillingness to adhere to accepted practices as they relate to conduct of Cemetery District board meetings.
-
CL13 Page 45Do you have any significant problems reading or understanding the English Language?
-
CL14 Page 45Do you have any suggestions, comments or other matters you would like to bring to the judges attention in connection with your application?
-
CL15 Page 45Please tell us about any special skills or abilities that you have which the judges should know about in considering your application?
-
CL16 Page 45Please tell us why you are interested in serving on the Tulare County Civil Grand Jury. (Please attach additional pages as needed)
-
CL17 Page 45Describe any background experience or skills you have which would be helpful to grand jury service (i.e., computer skills, leadership skills, or experience writing/editing reports, working in groups, or conducting investigations or interviews.) Mail in the envelope provided or deliver to: Attention: Civil Grand Jury Tulare County Superior Court 221 S. Mooney Blvd., Room 303 Visalia, CA 93291 Or Fax to: (559) 737-4290 NOTE: Applicants for nomination as a member of the Tulare County Civil Grand Jury are subject to investigation by an appropriate law enforcement agency as to the statutory qualifications for service and the applicant’s ability and suitability for service. In support of my application for selection as a member of the Tulare County Civil Grand Jury, I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing information is true and correct. Signed: Date: 36 Page of 5
-
CL18 Page 21Health and Human Services Agency: Findings F1-F5, Recommendation R1 ***Disclaimer*** Grand Jury reports are based on documentary evidence and the testimony of sworn or admonished witnesses, not on conjecture or opinion. However, the Grand Jury is precluded by law from disclosing such evidence except upon specific approval of the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court, or another judge appointed by the Presiding Judge (Penal Code Section 911, 924.1 (a) and 929). Similarly, the Grand Jury is precluded by law from disclosing the identity of witnesses except upon an order of the court for narrowly defined purposes (Penal Code Section 924.2 and 929). 14
-
CL19 Page 23Interviewed witnesses
-
CL20 Page 23Reviewed documents FACTS:
-
CL21 Page 26Tulare County’s ownership of property totaling 4,479 acres of land includes the following property types: Agriculture Land Detention Facilities Parks Airport/Airfields Fire Stations Ponding Basins Animal Control Facility Landfills Road Yards Auto Shops Libraries Sheriff’s Sub-Stations Borrow Pits Multi-Purpose Properties Undeveloped Land Clinics Museum Warehouses Courthouses Office Space Waste Water Treatment Plants Data Communication Facilities Parking Lots Well Sites
-
CL22 Page 26The above list does not include properties acquired through foreclosure, property tax default or right-of-way. These properties are outside the scope and authority of the PMD.
-
CL23 Page 26The PMD has a webpage that is accessed through the GSA website under “GSA Divisions” https://tularecounty. ca.gov/generalservices FINDINGS: F1. The PMD has written policies and procedures in place for the acquisition and disposition of real estate. F2. The PMD maintains a database of Tulare County properties that are: • owner/occupied properties • properties occupied as a tenant • properties leased out as a landlord F3. There is a process, which requires the Tulare County Board of Supervisors’ approval, for the sale, purchase and lease of real estate. Many of the procedures are dictated by the State of California. F4. The PMD follows a process to retain the services of a real estate brokerage firm on an exclusive basis to represent them in the acquisition and disposition of real estate. The brokerage firm is retained for one year, with the option to extend the contract for another year. 19 F5. The PMD’s website is outdated and lacking basic information such as: key people, available properties, forms and current Requests for Proposal. RECOMMENDTIONS: R1. That the PMD continue to refine their Real Estate Policy and Procedures Manual. R2. That the PMD enhance their website to include: key people, available properties that are for sale and for lease and current Requests for Proposals. REQUIRED RESPONSES:
-
CL24 Page 31Currently, VT has three electric operated buses in its 37-bus fleet. An additional three will be ordered in 2021. The cost of an electric bus is currently between $850,000 and $950,000, which is approximately $200,000 more than CNG- operated buses. The funding for buses comes from federal and state sources and grants.
-
CL25 Page 31TCAT operates the following services by contracting with a transportation provider, MV Transportation. The ridership is approximately 278,000 per year: • Fixed Route Service: 4 inter-city routes. 5 local circulators. Blended paratransit. • Dial-A-Ride service in the communities of Lindsay, rural Tulare/Waukena, South County and North County. • LOOP Bus Program.
-
CL26 Page 24Tulare County Sheriff : Findings F1-F4: Recommendations R1-R3: ***Disclaimer*** Grand Jury reports are based on documentary evidence and the testimony of sworn or admonished witnesses, not on conjecture or opinion. However, the Grand Jury is precluded by law from disclosing such evidence except upon specific approval of the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court, or another judge appointed by the Presiding Judge (Penal Code Section 911, 924.1 (a) and 929). Similarly, the Grand Jury is precluded by law from disclosing the identity of witnesses except upon an order of the court for narrowly defined purposes (Penal Code Section 924.2 and 929). 17 "GIVE ME LAND, LOTS OF LAND" BACKGROUND: Government entities at all levels in the United States are among the largest property owners and tenants in their respective areas. The same holds true for Tulare County. This scope of real estate ownership and tenancy entails significant capital expenditures, ongoing operating expenses, expertise and operating responsibility to be properly accountable to the taxpayers of the County. The management of real estate is an administrative function involving staffing, a detailed process, operating controls, budgeting, record keeping, analysis, implementation and monitoring. Traditionally, a government entity will house these functions in a Real Estate or Property Management Department. In Tulare County, the real estate function is handled by the Property Management Division (PMD) of the General Services Agency (GSA). The GSA is one of thirteen departments of the Tulare County government. The mission statement of the PMD is: “To secure, develop, and manage the properties and real estate assets necessary for the County to deliver services to the public.” In the course of their operations, the PMD is responsible for property acquisitions, dispositions, lease negotiations and tenant management. REASON FOR THE INVESTIGATION: The Tulare County Civil Grand Jury (TCCGJ) is given broad authority by the California Penal Code to perform reviews of county and city departments or agencies thereof. The decision is not necessarily based on suspicions of illegalities or malfeasance. It can be, as in the case of the GSA-PMD, to provide the general public of Tulare County with information regarding an important aspect of local government operations. The TCCGJ initiated an investigation into the practices and procedures of the GSA-PMD. Among those things of interest were the amount of real estate owned and leased by Tulare County and the process and procedures in place by the PMD to acquire and dispose of real estate. METHOD OF INVESTIGATION:
-
CL27 Page 25Reviewed documents 18
-
CL28 Page 26Tulare County leases (as a tenant) 64 properties totaling 550,000+ square feet. Rent currently paid by the County totals $9,358,068 annually.
No Responses Found 3
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.
County of Tulare
Agency
Tulare County Board of Supervisors
Elected County Office
Tulare County Sheriff
Elected County Office