📋
Extraído del Informe Consolidado

Esta investigación fue publicada originalmente como parte de un informe consolidado más amplio que contiene múltiples investigaciones. Consulte el PDF consolidado para ver el documento completo.

Napa County Grand Jury • 2023-2024

F3. Asizableportion of Napa County websitetrafficisvia mobiledevices.Somewebsite

Published: June 30, 2024 49 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 12 findings

F1
Although Skyline Academy was scheduled to open at the end of 2023, the Jury’s investigation detected limited organized effort toward the opening, no urgency, and minimal forward progress.
F2
Repeated requests for details on the development of Skyline Academy went unmet, leading the Jury to conclude that no formal project plan is being implemented. 5
F3
A sizable portion of Napa County website traffic is via mobile devices. Some website content is not optimized for smaller screened mobile devices.
F4
The county has not published to citizens a county strategic plan which outlines how to facilitate the distribution, efficiency, and quality of public information.
F5
Napa County’s overall communication efforts, while focused on “telling Napa County’s story”, is not engaging the community in a two-way conversation which could facilitate citizen engagement.
F6
Napa County lacks a formally articulated plan to continuously re-evaluate and update its communication strategies adapting to changing digital messaging technologies in order to assure that messaging remains timely, effective, and relevant.
F7
The switch from Nixle to Everbridge did not go through an RFP or similar evaluation process which has led to disruptions in citizen alert contacts that have not been satisfactorily resolved.
F8
County emergency notifications using the alert technology Everbridge are not reliably reaching all enrolled citizens, and it is unknown exactly how many residents are receiving messages.
F9
The Everbridge emergency notification mobile app for phones and other mobile digital devices is not performing reliably for citizens.
F10
The enrollment process for Everbridge is cumbersome and not well understood by the citizenry.
F11
Everbridge has not fulfilled all of its contractual obligations with Napa County.
F12
Napa County’s staff have improved measures to facilitate communication with citizen’s diverse languages and for those having disabilities or special needs.

Recommendations 10

Conclusions 2

Commendations 3

No Responses Found 2

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

Napa County County
Napa County Sheriff Elected County Office