Office of the Mayor Superior Court of California*
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 5 findings
Comments 2
-
CO1 Page 2Additionally, the City Council asked the voters in November 2012 to make the City Clerk responsible to the City Council in order to improve transparency, assure timely access to information by the City Council, and to limit the concentration of power in any one charter officer. R3 The City of Chico should continue the process of restructuring the city government. The City has implemented this recommendation. The City's reorganization from eleven departments to five has occurred and the City will evaluate the effectiveness of that reorganization and whether further organizational changes are needed on an ongoing basis. September 3, 2013 DRAFT Grand Jury Response FY 2012/2013 Page 2
-
CO2 Page 3Recently, the City Council began a review of its various committees, boards, and commissions to improve efficiencies. The City is also in the process of implementation of technology that will improve public access and feedback of meeting agendas. R4 The City of Chico should develop a viable financial plan to replenish funds with negative balances. The City is working to implement this recommendation. The city implemented approximately $4.8 million in reductions to stabilize annual operations and to achieve a true structural balance of revenues and expenses. With the adoption of the budget the City Council adopted budget policies which call for the dedication of additional future revenues to reduce current deficits and to restore numerous depleted reserve funds. The City intends to address the outstanding deficits with these policies over a ten year period. Additionally, the City has engaged the services of an audit firm that will provide additional recommendations for consideration. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ It is the Chico City Council and staff's desire to appropriately address the Butte County Grand Jury's findings and recommendations as related to its FY 2012/13 Annual Report. To reiterate, the City of Chico is committed to organizational transparency and accurately reporting facts. The matters raised by the Butte County Grand Jury are consistent with the concerns of the Chico City Council and appreciated in light of the challenges that the organization faces. If additional information and clarification is necessary, the City will be more than pleased to respond further. The City Council wishes to thank the Butte County Grand Jury for its commitment to ensuring oversight of the City of Chico's government activities and evaluating and providing input on the manner in which our government operates so it best serves the needs of our citizens. It is our mission to accept the Grand Jury's report, reflect upon comments received and put into place improvements to insure efficient and effective governance. Yours truly, Scott Gruendl, Mayor Mark Sorensen, Vice Mayor Mary Goloff, Council Member Sean Morgan, Council Member Tami Ritter, Council Member Ann Schwab, Council Member Randall Stone, Council Member Cc: Brian S. Nakamura, City Manager Lori Barker, City Attorney Chris Constantin, Administrative Services Director Deborah Presson, City Clerk September 3, 2013 DRAFT Grand Jury Response FY 2012/2013 Page 3
Agency Responses 1
Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.
* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.