📋

Extraído del Informe Consolidado

Esta investigación fue publicada originalmente como parte de un informe consolidado más amplio que contiene múltiples investigaciones. Consulte el PDF consolidado para ver el documento completo.

Yolo County Grand Jury • 2018-2019

A Report for the Citizens of Yolo County, California Arcade Arroz

Published: June 28, 2019 1 pages

View PDF View Full Original

⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.

⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.

Findings 18 findings

F1 Page 1

The quality and quantity of work performed by RD 537 and RD 900 met all

F2 Page 1

Whether RD 537 and RD 900 consolidate or remain separate, transparency and

F3 Page 1

Over the last four years, RD 537 and 900, City, and YLAFCo failed to effectively

F4 Page 1

Both reclamation districts and the City had ample opportunity to reach out to one

F5 Page 1

YLAFCo removed the recommendation that allows for the more common option of

F6 Page 1

WSAFCA could better serve the citizens of the City with a larger board and the

F7 Page 1

It is unclear if WSAFCA can remain intact under the City’s proposals for a

F8 Page 1

It is unclear and untested if the City’s General Fund is shielded from liability in a

F9 Page 1

YLAFCo did not fully examine the potential cost savings or issue of liability before

F10 Page 1

YLAFCo has no internal procedure to trigger an independent, third-party

F11 Page 1

Creating a governance change for a landowner district is fully within the authority

F12 Page 1

YLAFCo took much longer than the five years mandated by LAFCo law to publish

F13 Page 1

Although Yolo County had flood issue committees or working groups in the past,

F14 Page 1

Outside recreational time was minimal and could be augmented through the

F15 Page 1

There is a consensus that uncertainty about length of detainment and postdetainment placement creates anxiety in the youth.

F16 Page 1

Youth lack access to therapists who are independent of ORR and thus are unable to

F17 Page 1

The JDF is focusing more on high ratios of detention officers to youths, instead of

F18 Page 1

Traumatized youth are continuously exposed to art that may trigger bad memories

Recommendations 15

R1
Page 1

By December 31, 2019, each reclamation district website should highlight its
R2
Page 1

By October 1, 2019, General Managers for RD 537 and RD 900 should have
R3
Page 1

By February 1, 2022, YLAFCo should revisit and publish the MSR/SOI for RD
R4
Page 1

By January 1, 2020, increase the size of the WSAFCA Board from three to seven
R5
Page 1

By January 1, 2020, YLAFCo should create an internal procedure/policy to conduct
R6
Page 1

By January 1, 2020, YLAFCo should ensure a mechanism exists, if legally feasible,
R7
Page 1

By January 1, 2020, the Board of Supervisors should lead the creation of a multiagency and stakeholder flood committee or working group to facilitate
R8
Page 1

By January 1, 2020, the JDF should provide youth with therapists independent of
R9
Page 1

By October 1, 2019, the JDF should provide youth with a means for anonymously
R10
Page 1

By January 1, 2020, the JDF should enact procedures to mandate attendance of
R11
Page 1

By January 1, 2020, the Board of Supervisors should convene an independent
R12
Page 1

By January 1, 2020, the Probation Department should consider posting its policy
R13
Page 1

By January 1, 2020, Yolo County should provide a procedure that allows non-ORR
R14
Page 1

By January 1, 2020, Yolo County should allow access to ORR youth by its medical
R15
Page 1

Because few local and ORR youths are being detained in the JDF, and one pod is