Yuba County Grand Jury
• 2007-2008
“The only way to make sure people you agree with can speak, is to support the rights of people you don’t agree with.”
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 8 findings
F1
There are no restrictions imposed on the city council with regards to spending funds gained from the sale of city property.
F2
Although losses have been decreased substantially, Goldsox baseball continues to cost the City of Marysville. Net costs to the City for the 2005/2006 year were $77,385, estimated to be $63,582 in 2006/2007, and budgeted to be $39,500 in 2007/2008.
F3
The fire department changed from a city-operated fire department to a contract fire department operated by California Department of Forestry (CDF) in November of 1997. No in-depth study has been performed since 1997 to determine if operating with a CDF contract continues to be advantageous to the City.
F4
Dispatch Center is not staffed 24/7.
F5
Police Vehicle Maintenance is performed by the City of Marysville at the city yard.
F6
AdvanTex filtration systems are currently being introduced as experimental systems in Yuba County in locations where sand filters were the only effluent processing means. The experimental program prudently allows the county Environmental Health Department to gather data from AdvanTex filter systems to compare with the large volume of available third party data. Once satisfied that AdvanTex systems process effluent as well or better than sand filtration, AdvanTex filters can become mainstream selections for homeowners, especially in the foothills.
F7
The county surveyor has been working to simplify the lot line adjustment process. As a result of his work, a lot line adjustment is cheaper and easier than before.
F8
During the housing boom, consultants were brought in to augment staff. Some of the contractors interviewed claimed that the consultants were actually slowing the permit process. Now that the housing boom has abated, consultants are still in use in at least one department.
Recommendations 6
-
R1Draft an ordinance requiring funds received from the sale of city property to be deposited in a reserve account. The funds would be limited to use on capital improvement projects.
-
R2Enter into discussions with Yuba-Sutter Community Baseball, Inc, to explore the potential for negotiating a new agreement. Any new agreement should move the City to a minimum of a breakeven cost.
-
R3Conduct a study to verify that operating the fire department through a contract with CDF continues to be advantageous to the City. PASSED and ADOPTED by the Yuba County Grand Jury on the 17th day of May, 2008.
-
R4Hire sufficient personnel to fully staff the Dispatch Center.
-
R5The MPD should have a dedicated mechanic for better control of repairs and preventive maintenance. PASSED and ADOPTED by the Yuba County Grand Jury on the 27th day of May, 2008.
-
R8Review the functions performed by the outside consultants and assess whether those activities could be accomplished more efficiently and cost effectively in-house. PASSED and ADOPTED by the Yuba County Grand Jury on the 5th day of June, 2008.
Commendations 3
-
CM1 Page 87The Grand Jury Law Committee has determined that the Yuba County Jail facility is run efficiently. PASSED and ADOPTED by the Yuba County Grand Jury on the 3rd day of June, 2008. Response Required Penal Code sections 933 and 933.05 require that specific responses to both the findings and recommendations contained in this report be submitted to the Presiding Judge of the Yuba County Superior Court from: Yuba County Sheriff
-
CM2 Page 88California Penal Code Part 2 of Criminal Procedure Title 4. Grand Jury Proceedings Chapter 3. Powers and Duties of Grand Jury Article 2. Investigation of County, City, and District Affairs § 933. Finds and recommendations; copies of final report; comment of governing bodies, elective officers, or agency heads; definition (a) Each grand jury shall submit to the presiding judge of the superior court a final report of its findings and recommendations that pertain to county government matters during the fiscal or calendar year. Final reports on any appropriate subject may be submitted to the presiding judge of the superior court at any time during the term of service of a grand jury. A final report may be submitted for comment to responsible officers, agencies, or departments, including the county board of supervisors, when applicable, upon finding of the presiding judge that the report is in compliance with this title. For 45 days after the end of the term, the foreperson and his or her designees shall, upon reasonable notice, be available to clarify the recommendations of the report. (b) One copy of each final report, together with the responses thereto, found to be in compliance with this title shall be placed on file with the clerk of the court and remain on file in the office of the clerk. The clerk shall immediately forward a true copy of the report and the responses to the State Archivist who shall retain that report and all responses in perpetuity. (c) No later than 90 days after the grand jury submits a final report on the operations of any public agency subject to its reviewing authority, the governing body of the public agency shall comment to the presiding judge of the superior court on the findings and recommendations pertaining to matters under the control of the governing body, and every elected county officer or agency head for which the grand jury has responsibility pursuant to Section 914.1 shall comment within 60 days to the presiding judge of the superior court, with an information copy sent to the board of supervisors, on the findings and recommendations pertaining to matters under the control of that county officer or agency head and any agency or agencies which that officer or agency head supervises or controls. In any city and county, the mayor shall also comment on the findings and recommendations. All of these comments and reports shall forthwith be submitted to the presiding judge of the superior court who impaneled the grand jury. A copy of all responses to grand jury reports shall be placed on file with the clerk of the public agency and the office of the county clerk, or the mayor when applicable, and shall remain on file in those offices. One copy shall be placed on file with the applicable grand jury final report by, and in the control of the currently impaneled grand jury, where it shall be maintained for a minimum of five years. (d) As used in this section "agency" includes a department.
-
CM3 Page 89§933.05. Responses to findings (a) For purposes of subdivision (b) of Section 933, as to each grand jury finding, the responding person or entity shall indicate one of the following: (1) The respondent agrees with the finding. (2) The respondent disagrees wholly or partially with the finding, in which case the response shall specify the portion of the finding that is disputed and shall include an explanation of the reasons therefor. (b) For purposes of subdivision (b) of Section 933, as to each grand jury recommendation, the responding person or entity shall report one of the following actions: (1) The recommendation has been implemented, with a summary regarding the implemented action. (2) The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future, with a timeframe for implementation. (3) The recommendation requires further analysis, with an explanation and the scope and parameters of an analysis or study, and a timeframe for the matter to be prepared for discussion by the officer or head of the agency or department being investigated or reviewed, including the governing body of the public agency when applicable. This timeframe shall not exceed six months from the date of publication of the grand jury report. (4) The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or is not reasonable, with an explanation therefor. (c) However, if a finding or recommendation of the grand jury addresses budgetary or personnel matters of a county agency or department headed by an elected officer, both the agency or department head and the board of supervisors shall respond if requested by the grand jury, but the response of the board of supervisors shall address only those budgetary or personnel matters over which it has some decision-making authority. The response of the elected agency or department head shall address all aspects of the findings or recommendations affecting his or her agency or department. (d) A grand jury may request a subject person or entity to come before the grand jury for the purpose of reading and discussing the findings of the grand jury report that relates to that person or entity in order to verify the accuracy of the findings prior to their release. (e) During an investigation, the grand jury shall meet with the subject of that investigation regarding the investigation, unless the court, either on its own determination or upon request of the foreperson of the grand jury, determines that such a meeting would be detrimental. (f) A grand jury shall provide to the affected agency a copy of the portion of the grand jury report relating to that person or entity two working days prior to its public release and after the approval of the presiding judge. No officer, agency, department, or governing body of a public agency shall disclose any contents of the report prior to the public release of the final report.
No Responses Found 1
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.
Marysville
City