⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 3 findings
F1
Issue #1 Just because “this type of fraud is a common occurrence, and the perpetrator was experienced and had stolen from seven other counties, three of which were other municipalities” it should not be acceptable or occurring in the Finance Department.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Issue #1 Ongoing training and auditing of processing payments and identifying scams should be made a priority in the Finance Department.
F2
Issue #2 Kings County Department Heads approve the expenditures of their departments without independent review from the Finance Department.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Issue #2 The Finance Department should have an employee or system in place to review expenditures which were previously approved by all Department Heads.
F3
Issue #3 The Finance Department sent out incorrect 1099’s that were received later than the January 31st postmark deadline required by IRS Title 26 CFR 1.6041-6.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
Issue #3 The Finance Department should continue training on the process of issuing form 1099 in the proper time frame as stated in IRS Title 26 CFR 1.6041-6.
No Responses Found 3
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.