San Mateo County Grand Jury • 2004-2005

Issue | Background | Findings | Conclusions | Recommendations | Responses | Attachments Review of Agriculture

Published: January 04, 2005 11 pages
View Original PDF

Note: Missing finding numbers detected: F8, F9, F10, F11, F12, F13, F14, F15, F16, F17, F18, F19, F20, F21, F22, F23, F24, F25, F26, F27, F28, F29, F30, F31, F32

Findings 8 findings

F1
Agriculture performs vital services of education, inspection, and quarantine to prevent pests and diseases from infecting both imported and exported plants in a thorough and efficient manner.
F2
Agriculture ensured that 95 % of agricultural and pest control businesses in the County in 2003 were in compliance with all pesticide regulatory requirements.
F3
Agriculture, in collaboration with the California Department of Food and Agriculture, developed a unique certification program that now allows for the export of plants to Canada from Sudden Oak Death-infected counties including San Mateo County. Plant shipments to Canada from infected counties had been prohibited since November 2001. 3
F4
Weights and Measures monitors the calibration and accuracy of various weighing scales and measuring devices for over 2000 businesses in the County in a timely and efficient manner.
F5
Weights and Measures exhibited leadership with the creation of the price scanner program to the benefit of the consumers of San Mateo County.
F6
Weights and Measures has cross-trained employees to be more flexible in the face of personnel cutbacks and has managed the budget challenges of the past few years in a responsible manner.
F7
Weights and Measures maintains a high level of customer satisfaction (95% to 98%) for services rated as “Good” or “Better”. The recent San Mateo County Cares survey indicated a high approval rating for Weights and Measures’ courteous and responsible services. Conclusion The Grand Jury finds that the Agriculture Commissioner/ Sealer of Weights and Measures Division is well managed and commends the Division for the quality of service provided. COUNTY OF SAN MATEO Inter-Departmental Correspondence County Manager’s Office DATE: March 14, 2005 BOARD MEETING DATE: March 29, 2005 SPECIAL NOTICE/HEARING: None VOTE REQUIRED: Majority TO: Honorable Board of Supervisors FROM: John L. Maltbie, County Manager SUBJECT: County Responses to Grand Jury Reports and Recommendations
F33
The San Mateo County 1999 Grand Jury recommends that the County Board of Supervisors direct the Director of Public Works to prepare a comprehensive time-phased plan for completion of the seismic retrofit and lead/asbestos abatement of the County Hall of Justice. Urgency should be placed on the development and implementation of the plan, including a detailed time-phased series of actions and the designation of personnel responsible for each action and associated deadlines. The plan should include details on office and employee relocation. The County Board of Supervisors should give high priority to implementation and funding of this program. Response: Concur. The Director of Public Works will work with the Court on developing a tentative phasing plan that allows for the work to go forward on the 7th and 8th floors. A similar approach will be undertaken with the Probation Department for the 5th Floor. However, a key aspect of this plan will be to identify additional funding sources. An additional $2.2 million will be required to complete the project. To date, the County has spent approximately $1.6 million in the design of the seismic retrofit plan, the remediation work that was done immediately after the Loma Prieta Earthquake, and for the work completed or under construction on the 4th and 6th floors. Public Works estimates that it will take approximately two years to complete the work once funding is identified and agreement with the Court and Probation is obtained. Abatement work is generally done in conjunction with other work on the structure, as encapsulated lead and asbestos in the building will remain in place and does not present a threat to either the citizens visiting the Hall of Justice or employees. Status: Final Phase - Installation of Seismic Dampers and Roof Panels Retrofit On June 8, 2004, the Board of Supervisor, under Resolution No. 66710, adopted plans and specifications, determining prevailing wage scales and calling for sealed bid proposals. On July 6, 2004, bids were accepted for this project and were subsequently referred to the Department of Public Works for checking and

Recommendations 5

Conclusions 1

No Responses Found 4

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

San Mateo County Board of Supervisors Elected County Office
San Mateo County District Attorney Elected County Office
San Mateo County Office of Education Agency
San Mateo County Sheriff Elected County Office